60 pages • 2 hours read
Stacey AbramsA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
While Justice Sleeps highlights and critiques the pervasive nature of corruption. It’s apparent in politics (as exemplified by President Stokes’s character) and in the business sector (as seen in Nigel’s and Indira’s characters). It’s also apparent in the media, as when President Stokes’s people get the Washington Gazette to publish a headline designed to discredit Avery: “JUSTICE’S MISTRESS, SON’S GIRLFRIEND, JUNKIE’S DAUGHTER—WHO IS AVERY KEENE?” (236). This exemplifies the trickle-down effect corruption often has. For example, Castillo and Phillips act unethically on the behalf of Major Vance, who acts unethically on behalf of the president. The book underscores the rampant nature of corruption while also highlighting the common human traits that often contribute to that corruption, such as a desire for power (President Stokes) and greed (Nigel).
Justice Wynn is the voice that articulates the troubling nature of this corruption. This is introduced immediately in the Prologue when he considers his repugnance toward both the media, which he describes as “willful” ignorance, and politicians, whom he characterizes as “smug stupidity” (1). He considers them all “vapid and arrogant thugs” contributing to the downward spiral of society (1). His critique of the corrupt nature of society is rearticulated in the letter that he leaves Avery and Jared: “I stumbled into a labyrinth of lies told by carpetbaggers and Frankensteins and lesser kings” (214).
The book offers plenty of case studies in corruption through various characters (President Stokes, Major Vance, Castillo, Phillips, Indira, Nigel). However, the book also introduces characters that are morally upright: Agent Lee, Jared, Ling, Noah, and Avery. Avery is the ultimate example of someone who is incorruptible, and the book posits that this trait springs from her loyalty, which Major Vance cites as the reason she is unlikely to respond to bribery.
Ironically, Avery’s position as the moral hero of the story doesn’t mean that she always takes the ethical high road. This is seen when she helps to frame President Stokes for a murder he didn’t commit, for example. Avery may not be corrupt, but she still has an agenda, and she is willing to lie for that agenda. The difference is that Avery’s actions are driven by a desire for a greater good. She is not driven by self-serving desires like power, fame, status, connections, or greed.
In addition to serving as the ultimate example of anti-corruption, Avery also serves as the ultimate example of genuine loyalty. This is reflected in her personal life as well as in her career. Avery is depicted rescuing Rita in the first chapter, and this loyalty to her mother often conflicts with her personal interests. For example, Avery spends her money on getting her mother into rehab—and on the night when she goes to bail Rita out, Avery ends up staying out all night, even though she has to work the next day.
Justice Wynn recognizes both Avery’s moral fortitude and her loyalty. In a flashback, when the judge asks Avery “Are you loyal to me?” she replies, “I’m loyal to this Court. I swore to uphold the law and support the Constitution” (58). While Avery’s loyalty is presented as a positive trait, it also gets her into trouble. By remaining loyal to Justice Wynn, she jeopardizes her own career, her well-being, and even Rita’s life. This last point exemplifies how loyalty to one thing in life may mean betraying another. Justice Wynn recognizes this conundrum when he learns about Hygeia’s research and the Tigris Project: He has to choose between loyalty to Jared, his son, and loyalty to his nation and his post as a Supreme Court judge, a figure meant to protect justice.
Loyalty can also be a dangerous trait, as Avery herself realizes. She describes herself as a “blind, stupid, loyal weapon that would stay on course until I hit my target” (238). Avery’s argument that loyalty isn’t always “smart” complicates the book’s celebration of loyalty as a trait. While loyalty is, theoretically, a positive characteristic, misguided loyalty can be problematic and put a person in danger.
Major Vance’s allegiance to the president exemplifies this uncompromising loyalty. He identifies his fealty to the president as fealty to his country; by fulfilling the president’s wishes, Vance sees himself as a patriot. Ultimately, however, Vance’s loyalty will prove tenuous. Faced with the president’s betrayal, Vance will turn on him, exposing the fact that Stokes murdered former President Cadres. When faced with the larger truth, misguided loyalty can crumble.
The theme of corruption central to While Justice Sleeps is complemented by the book’s argument regarding the dangerous nature of power games, especially political games. Multiple characters in the book exhibit a power-hungry nature, including Indira, Nigel, and—most significantly—President Stokes. Their desire for power results in a self-serving attitude that leads them down morally corrupt paths. Many of these characters also take part in complex “games” of strategy to help protect their power. One example is President Stokes’s strategy to pack the Supreme Court with a justice of his choosing (once Justice Wynn is out of the way). And it’s worth noting that the consequences of power games failing are explored as well; they do not inspire true loyalty. For example, when President Stokes betrays Major Vance, Vance in turn double-crosses him, almost immediately.
The book’s thematic treatment of games, particularly strategic games, is supported by the symbolic significance of chess throughout the narrative. Chess is a crucial game of strategy that requires not only knowing one’s own moves but also anticipating those of one’s opponent. Chess may also require accepting some losses in order to achieve a greater win—as exemplified by the Lasker-Bauer game that Justice Wynn uses as inspiration for his grand plan. The problem with such games is that there are multiple players, and there’s no way to reliably predict the other players’ strategies. This is exemplified when Avery’s apartment is bugged by Major Vance and his team. Theoretically, the surveillance should give Major Vance the upper hand, allowing him insights into Avery’s daily activities and plans. However, once Avery discovers the bugs, she keeps them intact and leverages them to her advantage, providing Major Vance with false clues as to her plans and thoughts. This is one way that Avery is ultimately able to “beat” Major Vance at his own game.
Power games are explored in many forms here. Beyond those played for more obvious motives, like financial greed, there are subtler power games afoot. Avery’s mother, Rita, wields her own form of power by emotionally abusing and manipulating her daughter as a way of retaining some form of control in her life—in this case, over her daughter’s emotions and finances, since she has no control over her own actions. Like Justice Wynn, Indira is affected by her own degenerative disease, which makes her stake in the merger a much heavier one than Nigel’s; they work as a team, united by a common goal, but are driven by different motivations. “Power,” for Indira, is actually her health. Ultimately, the biogenetic weapon engineered to target a particular population is a power play on a much larger scale, as was the original partitioning of India by the British.
The narrative invokes the Lasker-Bauer match repeatedly not just to help Avery figure out how to play Justice Wynn’s game but also to keep up a constant refrain reminding the reader that such games inherently cannot be won without sacrificing players—whether key characters who are powerful figures themselves, like the “bishops” Ani and Wynn, or relatively innocent figures, or “pawns,” like the extorted nurse Jamie, who loses her life in the game without ever gaining from it.