52 pages • 1 hour read
Mona Hanna-AttishaA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
What the Eyes Don’t See is the story of city and state government officials poisoning the residents of Flint and then lying about it. Dr. Mona’s focus is on the impacts lead exposure from drinking water has on the most vulnerable population: children. The reasons for this are twofold. The first is to raise awareness that this truly is a serious public health issue for children. The DC water crisis exposed this, yet, because it was not part of the larger public discourse, many citizens and public health experts alike were not aware of the problem. By continuously centering her argument on Flint kids and the fact that lead poisoning perpetuates inequality, Dr. Mona also invokes an emotional response in the reader.
Greater prevalence of lead exposure in children are found in low-income and minority neighborhoods, which contributes to the racial-education gap that we see in the US. Email evidence supports that some government officials knew lead was poisoning Flint kids, but they did not put resources into the problem because the community was poor. By the end of the book, it becomes clear that people need to take a stand collectively against injustices, including lead exposure from drinking water, because our government might not be fulfilling its duty to protect its citizens. No other children should be exposed to lead from their drinking water.
Dr. Mona frequently refers to her family history. This is partly to explain her own experiences growing up in the US as an Iraqi-American. She and her brother, Mark, were the few minority kids in their school. While they faced some ethnic slurs, unlike her Flint kids, the American dream worked for her and her family. In this way, Mona checks her own privilege and forces the reader to think about their own privileges as well. The Flint kids live under a system that doesn’t work for them and maybe was never meant to. Dr. Mona also uses her family stories to show what drove her to stand up for the children of Flint. She comes from a long line of activists who stood up for others, even in the face of great tyranny.
Dr. Mona frequently notes that she “stood on the shoulders of giants” (320). In part, this is a way of reminding readers that she was not the most important puzzle piece in the Flint water crisis. Those whom she intimately worked with, like Marc Edwards, helped pave the way for the scientific argument that she was ultimately able to make: elevated blood-lead data explicitly can be linked to lead in water. It also shows the power of activism, even in the face of great adversity. Many of these giants that Mona discusses, such as Alice Hamilton and John Snow, went up against government and scientific experts of their time. Alice Hamilton tried to get the US government to reject GM’s claim that leaded gasoline was safe. John Snow challenged the prevailing miasmatic theory of his time regarding the spread of cholera. While their findings were not accepted until later, they continued to fight for what they believed in. Without them, it might have taken scientists and researchers longer to realize the lead was dangerous to the human body and environment and water can spread dangerous bacteria and other particles.
As the book’s title suggests, the idea that “the eyes don’t see what the mind doesn’t know” is central to Dr. Mona’s argument. At first, Mona uses it to express her own dismay at not having seen the bigger picture when it comes to her Flint kids. She first heard this expression during her own pediatric residency. The pediatrician in charge, Dr. Ashok Sarnaik, challenged the residents to “know every possible genetic syndrome under sun and its underlying pathophysiology” (23), because how else could you figure out a diagnosis if you had not read or studied about it. Mona widened the focus of the expression to include things that were not immediately visible to the naked eye, such as toxic stressors. As the book progresses, however, Dr. Mona uses this expression to sum up the struggles that she and other past and present public health experts have gone through to get their concerns taken seriously.
Since the Roman period, we have known that lead exposure leads to serious behavioral and cognitive changes. The public health field has created campaigns to eradicate lead in homes, including in paint, and children’s environment, including imported makeup (kohl eyeliner), imported toys, and even parental hobbies (guns and stained glass). Yet, public health experts never thought to check the water. Even when citizens and scientists began to raise the alarm that lead in water is a serious issue, the public health field did not collectively take these findings seriously. It was only after Dr. Mona was able to directly link elevated blood-lead levels with lead exposure from drinking water that the public health dialogue shifted. While this is an important shift, it does not help all the kids missed in DC, Flint, and elsewhere in the US and around the world