logo

56 pages 1 hour read

Svetlana Alexievich

Voices from Chernobyl: The Oral History of a Nuclear Disaster

Nonfiction | Book | Adult | Published in 1997

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Part 2, Chapters 1-5Chapter Summaries & Analyses

Part 2: “The Land of the Living”

Part 2, Chapter 1 Summary: “About Old Prophecies”

Larisa Z. relates how her four-year-old daughter was born with severe birth defects—she had only one kidney and no anus or vagina—yet survived four surgeries. Larisa complains that the doctors only recently acknowledged that her daughter’s condition was caused by radiation exposure. She adds that her village was initially supposed to be evacuated, but “then they crossed it off their lists—the government didn’t have enough money” (86).

Part 2, Chapter 2 Summary: “About a Moonlit Landscape”

Y. A. Brovkin, an instructor at Gomel State University, recalls driving home from a business trip on a moonlit night and being moved by the appearance of farm fields where the contaminated topsoil had been removed and replaced with white dolomite sand: “It was like not-earth” (89), he says, reflecting how the disaster seemed to have altered physical reality. Musing about why so little has been written about the disaster in comparison to World War II and Stalinism, he argues that this is because of the Chernobyl disaster’s fundamental incomprehensibility: “We don’t know how to capture any meaning from it. […] We can’t place it in our human experience or our human time-frame” (90). Wars eventually end, and they have winners and losers, but “victory” over radioactive fallout is impossible.

Part 2, Chapter 3 Summary: “About a Man Whose Tooth was Hurting When He Saw Christ Fall”

Arkady Filin recounts the abrupt manner in which he and others were conscripted as liquidators:

They came suddenly, gave me a notice, and said, There’s a car waiting downstairs. It was like 1937. They came at night to take you out of your warm bed. Then that stopped working: people’s wives would refuse to answer the door, or they’d lie, say their husbands were away […]. So they started grabbing people at work, on the street, during a lunch break at the factory cafeteria. It was just like 1937 (90).

He’s comparing it to the peak year of Stalin’s Great Purge, when anyone could be arrested at any time for any or no reason. The decontamination work itself felt surreal: “We buried houses, wells, trees. We buried the earth. […] We buried the forest” (92). He says he couldn’t sleep at night, suggesting that the unnaturalness of burying earth under earth was deeply disturbing. Residents “didn’t understand why we had to bury their gardens, rip up their garlic and cabbage when it looked like ordinary garlic and ordinary cabbage” (92). Meanwhile, a dosimeter reading would reveal that a stove with lard cooking on it was “not a stove, it’s a little nuclear reactor” (92).

Part 2, Chapter 4 Summary: “Three Monologues About a Single Bullet”

V. I. Verzhikovskiy (the chairman of a local sportsmen’s association) and hunters Andrei and Vladimir were tasked with exterminating pet dogs and cats left behind in evacuated villages. They spent two months in the Zone with no protective gear, witnessing surreal scenes of abandonment. They dumped truckloads of animal corpses in a makeshift “cemetery” that was supposed to be lined to prevent groundwater contamination but in fact was “just a deep hole in the ground” (102).

Part 2, Chapter 5 Summary: “About How We Can’t Live Without Chekhov and Tolstoy”

Katya P. was a child living in Pripyat at the time of the disaster. On the day of the explosion, she and the other kids “raced to the station on our bikes, and those who didn’t have bikes were jealous. No one yelled at us not to go” (105). Everything seemed normal until people began showing visible signs of radiation poisoning. Katya compares herself and fellow Chernobylites to the ostracized survivors of the Hiroshima atomic bombing, known in Japan as Hibakusha, who can’t marry anyone except other survivors. She has a fiancé, but his mother worries about Katya’s reproductive health, telling her, “My dear, for some people it’s a sin to give birth” (108). Young survivors like Katya carry the burden of the increased probability of birth defects in their children in addition to the trauma of evacuation and resettlement. Like Brovkin in Chapter 2, she notes that while books and movies about the war are plentiful, none are available to help her make sense of Chernobyl.

Part 2, Chapters 1-5 Analysis

This section further illuminates Chernobyl survivors’ disillusionment with Soviet officials because of their dishonesty, incompetence, and corruption, beginning with Larisa Z.’s complaints about the doctors’ slowness in diagnosing radiation syndrome and the evacuation of her village being canceled for budgetary reasons.

In Chapter 5, Katya’s memories of playing outside with other kids on the day of the explosion testify to the regime’s failure to inform or protect local residents for a full 36 hours. In Chapter 4, the description of hunters dumping animal corpses into an unlined hole illustrates the careless incompetence that plagued much of the official post-disaster response and was pervasive in the Soviet workplace more broadly. In Chapter 3, Arkady Filin describes the sort of everyday corruption endemic to Soviet officialdom:

[Y]ou could buy anything for a bottle of vodka. A medal, or sick leave. One kolkhoz chairman would bring a case of vodka to the radiation specialists so they’d cross his village off the lists for evacuation; another would bring the same case so that they’d put his village on the list—he’d already been promised a three-room apartment in Minsk. No one checked the radiation reports (94).

Decisions affecting the health of thousands of unwitting residents were made on entirely venal grounds. Nevertheless, Filin describes this unethical behavior with the matter-of-fact fatalism common among Soviet citizens in the 1980s: “It was just your average Russian chaos. That’s how we live” (94). Decades of authoritarian rule had taught citizens that they were powerless to effect independent change. Filin is more emotional when decrying the decision to send liquidators to the reactor roof: “These were suicide missions. What would you call this? Soviet paganism? Live sacrifice?” (95). Officials and workers alike knew that this labor would result in illness and quite possibly death. Even so, he says, he too would have gone up there if so ordered, although he can’t explain why. This admission hints at the theme of Collectivism Versus Individualism: Even a cynic like Filin would not have hesitated to put his life on the line if so ordered.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
blurred text