logo

50 pages 1 hour read

Wade Davis

The Wayfinders: Why Ancient Wisdom Matters in the Modern World

Nonfiction | Book | Adult | Published in 2009

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Essay Topics

1.

Is there a difference between wisdom and science? Explain with references from the text.

2.

Do you believe the ethnosphere is as integral to the continued habitation of this planet as the biosphere? Explain with references from the text.

3.

Tibetan Buddhist Matthieu Ricard defines Buddhism as a “science of the mind” (183). What does he mean by this statement? Do other cultures in the text have similar “sciences” of belief?

4.

In the final lecture Davis states that “a single adaptive challenge, surviving drought, reverberates through the entire [Rendille] culture, defining for these nomadic tribes what it means to be human” (189). Choose one of the cultural histories you or your family live in or are a part of, ancient or modern. Is there an adaptation that you can think of that has the same import? What is it? How does it “reverberate” in other aspects of the culture?

5.

Wayfinding is the tradition of Polynesian sea navigation, but Davis applies the term to all the ancient cultures covered in the text. Define this broader sense of wayfinding, and identify it in two cultures featured in the text.

6.

What is the purpose of culture? Is your reading different from Davis’s reading? Explain with references from the text.

7.

Davis repeatedly refers to a “Victorian cult of improvement” (11) and a Western “cult of progress” (188). What does Davis mean by these terms? How do they differ from religious perspectives on the nature of human endeavor? Explain with references from the text.

8.

How has The Wayfinders changed your perspective on the function of (a) religion or (b) anthropology? Explain with references from the text.

9.

Davis praises the Canadian government for seeking “appropriate means of restitution” (204) for the Inuit of Nunavut. Based on the histories presented in the text, do you think restitution for indigenous people is necessary? If not, why not? If so, what should this restitution look like? Is this the only way industrial and indigenous nations can move forward together?

10.

What can the scientific study of indigenous cultures actually do to serve them? Is it worthwhile for anthropologists to engage with these cultures over other professionals, such as doctors or lobbyists? Explain with references from the text.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
blurred text