49 pages • 1 hour read
Ned BlackhawkA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
Chapter 10 addresses drastic changes in Native American policy adopted by the federal government in the wake of the Civil War. At the core of these policy changes was a federal assertion of plenary power over Native American affairs despite the Constitution’s supposed enshrinement of Indigenous sovereignty through treaty law. Blackhawk locates the legal origins of the federal government’s absolute power in the 1887 General Allotment Act, which legalized the division of reservations into individual plots of land, sellable by Native male “heads of household.” The Allotment Act was part of a new government campaign of assimilationist policies that promoted the cultural erasure of Native tribes as well as the dissolution of their sovereignty. Though these policies violated treaties, federal policy makers did not seem to care.
In addition to land alienation, the federal government also began to enforce the systematic kidnapping and relocation of Native American children into so-called “boarding schools.” These institutions operated with the express mission of assimilating Native American children to Euro-American culture. Blackhawk recounts: “Untold numbers suffered physical and sexual abuse, and thousands died due to disease, overly strict discipline, and deprivation” (490). This systematic abuse was suffered by multiple generations of Indigenous families who were simultaneously being deprived of their lands due to policies such as the Allotment Act. Government-imposed poverty forced Native parents into an impossible dilemma, as boarding schools became the only settings equipped to feed Native children.
Throughout this Reservation Era, a series of Supreme Court cases reaffirmed the federal government’s claims to plenary power. Most notably, in United States v. Kagama, the court found that “only two forms of sovereign authority reside in the United States: the sovereignty of the federal governments and state governments” (501). The interpretive flexibility of the US Constitution was once again being leveraged against Native Americans. Legal reparations for the devastation inflicted on Indigenous communities in this period only began being implemented in the late 20th century (496). Indigenous communities once again turned to cultural revival movements, most notably the increasingly popular Ghost Dance, to claim cultural autonomy amid colonial chaos.
Shifting focus away from military conflicts and physical violence, Blackhawk examines a rhetorical war that was waged against Native Americans at the turn of the 20th century. White supremacist mythologies painted Indigenous Americans as a phenomenon of the past, erasing the contemporary struggles of tribes and contributing to a sanitized vision of US history. Blackhawks sums this mythology up as follows: “In a morality play with foregone conclusions, the United States emerged from the conquest of Indian lands and achieved its destiny through continental expansion” (508). These narratives were formulated by academics and promoted performatively in settings such as the Worlds Fairs. Notorious “Indian fighters” such as William “Buffalo Bill” Cody objectified Native Americans as profit-turning displays for white audiences.
Such mythology was not met with silence by Native Americans. Indigenous performers at Worlds Fairs utilized their time with white audiences to “publicize their community’s concerns, to critique governmental policies, and to counteract public misconceptions” (513). Indigenous academics also formed a countermovement. In 1911, the Society of American Indians (SAI) held its first meeting to initiate an Indigenous rights movement throughout the country. Blackhawk highlights the work of female thinkers such as Laura Cornelius Kellogg (Oneida, 1880-1947) and Elizabeth Bender Cloud (Ojibwe, 1887-1965) in the society’s articulations of Pan-Indianism. Despite these contributions, however, the SAI maintained a patriarchal structure. In a country with increasingly solidifying colonial infrastructure, resistance through education was promoted by the Bender Cloud family, which operated the highly influential American Indian Institute as an alternative to assimilationist boarding schools.
US federal Indigenous policy shifted in the aftermath of World War II and once again changed the fortunes of Native communities across the country. The “Indian New Deal,” implemented by John Collier, the Roosevelt administration’s new Commissioner of the Bureau of Indian Affairs, ended destructive government policies such as allotment and reaffirmed Native autonomy. Blackhawk understands Collier’s transformative policies as the direct result of decades of Indigenous advocacy: “For a brief period, a new era of federal Indian affairs had emerged” (564). Though fleeting, the Indian New Deal illustrated a relationship between organized Indigenous movements for autonomy and positive shifts in US policy making. Subsequent Indigenous rights movements, as Blackhawk’s analysis demonstrates, built upon the work of organizations like the SAI that achieved transformative advocacy in an environment of pervasive racism.
Chapter 12 opens with another seismic shift in US policy as the postwar government sought to terminate its obligations to federally recognized tribes. Deceptive tactics were used to push these policies through, as officials marketed termination as a form of tribal liberation from the federal government. But termination ultimately served Euro-American interests, as newly unprotected tribes lost claims to their homelands, and Indigenous resources were devastated by predatory private interests. One tribe that effectively resisted the devastation of termination was the Menominee Nation of Wisconsin, which curbed the private interests of a lumber mill on its land through an advisory council that oversaw operations. Ada Deer (1935-2023), future Assistant Secretary for Indian Affairs, grew up on the Menominee reservation and witnessed how tribal oversight of the mill ensured the community’s prosperity. Elsewhere, as termination policies deprived Native communities of resources, the Indian Adoption Project sought to privatize the economic burden of caring for Indigenous children. Thousands of children were placed with nonnative families in a process of transcultural adoption that facilitated cultural erasure.
Blackhawk describes how the fascist colonialism of World War II’s axis powers frequently found inspiration in the United States’ federal Indigenous policies. In Germany, Hitler likened his campaigns of ethnic cleansing to those waged by the US government against its Native tribes along the Mississippi. In Japan, Torajirō Satō, one of the founders of the ethnonationalist settler organization Dōminkai, learned Western theories of racial hierarchy during his time in the United States and Australia. As Blackhawk works to illustrate, these Indigenous roots of the core ideological conflicts underlying World War II recentralize Native Americans, who are frequently ignored by historians of the global conflict. Contrary to popular narratives, Blackhawk asserts, “In direct and indirect ways, Native Americans shaped the course of the Second World War” (572).
As the SAI had done in the early 20th century, the increasingly popular Red Power Movement galvanized a new generation of Indigenous activists to reclaim autonomy from a colonialist federal government. Centralized in organizations such as the National Indian Youth Council, this movement gained global visibility previously unheard of for Indigenous activists in the United States with their months-long occupation of Alcatraz Island beginning in 1969. Under the guidance of informative works such as Custer Died for Your Sins, Red Power activists formulated a doctrine of Indigenous autonomy that changed the tides of US federal policy. Blackhawk closes the book with Deer’s appointment to federal office in 1993, a hopeful outlook despite the numerous existential threats still facing Native Americans.
As Blackhawk’s analysis covers periods increasingly close to the 21st century, the implications of dehumanizing federal Indigenous policy and popular American culture become increasingly charged. Despite major challenges to Indigenous sovereignty and communities, Native groups fought for Tribal Agency Amid Subjugation through organizations such as the SAI and Red Power Movement. An increasing number of female figures serve as the central cast of Blackhawk’s narration of these chapters, cementing the indispensability of Indigenous women’s autonomy to his understanding of Native American autonomy. Women such as Laura Cornelius Kellogg, Elizabeth Bender Cloud, and Ada Deer represent the forefront of Native activism throughout the 20th century.
Federal policies targeting Indigenous children show how US Policy Shifts and Their Impacts on Indigenous Life often most impacted the most vulnerable subpopulations. Just as Native women were particularly susceptible to sexually violent colonizers, Native children were particularly susceptible to the overwhelming power of the US federal government. Blackhawk’s analysis is sensitive to the tragedy of this piece of history, giving voice to adoption survivors such as Joan Kauppi (Red Lake Anishinaabe) and Evelyn Red Lodge (Lakota): “Feelings of loss, anger, and betrayal accompanied their placements. Abuse was common” (597). In a work that frequently focuses on the physical manifestations of colonial trauma, such as violent action and geographic displacement, Blackhawk’s acknowledgment of the internal landscape of individual traumatic memory in these final chapters fleshes out the emotional core of his area of study.
US federal Indigenous policy takes on international implications in the final chapters, challenging the romanticized historical narratives of the US’s role in World War II. The fact that Hitler emulated American ethnic cleansing policies in designing the Holocaust undercuts the United States’ patriotic self-image as saviors of the world during the World War II. Though the US may have been pivotal in putting a stop to the Holocaust, its genocidal policies contributed to it. As such, Rediscovery goes beyond centralizing Native American experiences in US history; it centralizes Native American experiences in global history. Such outward-facing conclusions open endless new possibilities for the field of Native American studies, as connections between Indigenous American events and other global events have yet to be comprehensively analyzed.
Blackhawk understands the limitations of his own work: “I would underscore that this is not the whole story…but this is one way into a larger story” (“Ned Blackhawk on The Rediscovery of America.” YouTube, uploaded by Yale Press, 25 Apr. 2023). His decision to end the book’s account of Native American history in 1993, 30 years before its publication, simultaneously adheres to the historical field’s conventions of acceptable scopes of study and raises questions for readers who desire to fill that gap with further inquiry. The world has changed immensely since 1993, as have the circumstances of Indigenous Americans. The final chapters of Rediscovery, therefore, leave audiences wondering how Blackhawk’s central themes of encounter, tribal agency, and US policy shifts have carried over into the 21st century.
Finally, Blackhawk indicts his own field of history in the challenges Native groups faced, demonstrating how academic historians contributed to the racism leveraged against Native Americans at the outset of the 20th century. Blackhawk demands self-reflection from his academic readers. This line of discussion harkens back to the extratextual mission statement in Rediscovery’s Introduction: “It is time to put down the interpretive tools of the previous century and take up new ones” (13). Blackhawk closes his survey of Native American history by bringing his analysis back to the questions he raised at its outset. What obligations does the field of history have to its subjects, especially historically marginalized communities? How can academic lines of inquiry shape popular understanding of Native Americans? How are activism and historical representation interrelated, especially amid media technology in the contemporary world?
Books on Justice & Injustice
View Collection
Books on U.S. History
View Collection
Colonialism & Postcolonialism
View Collection
Contemporary Books on Social Justice
View Collection
Equality
View Collection
Indian Literature
View Collection
Indigenous People's Literature
View Collection
National Book Awards Winners & Finalists
View Collection
Politics & Government
View Collection