107 pages • 3 hours read
Ken LiuA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more. For select classroom titles, we also provide Teaching Guides with discussion and quiz questions to prompt student engagement.
Liu has written this story in a documentary style, as if the participants are speaking into a camera, so each anecdote is told in the first person. There are major players, who advance the narrative, and anecdotes from “regular” people, representing the tide of public opinion, that alternate through the story.
Dr. Akemi Kirino and her husband, Dr. Evan Wei, found a way to go back in time, thanks to subatomic particles called Bohm-Kirino particles. They can only go back once, and then no one can go back to that point in time again.
During the Second Sino-Japanese War of World War II, there was an “Asian Auschwitz,” Unit 731 or Pingfang. There, in 1940, scientists tested biological and chemical weapons in the compound, killing between 200,000 and half a million Chinese prisoners. Evan plans to focus his and his wife’s time-travel technique on the atrocity, sending volunteers to bear witness.
The decision is fraught with controversy. One historian, Archibald Ezary says, “What role, if any, we wish to give the voices of the past in the present is up to us” (399), while Chung-Nian Shih of the National Independent University of Taiwan questions Evan’s decision to send volunteers rather than historians or journalists, especially since these moments in history can only be seen once. Lt. Ruming of Zhejian University points out that history is not a private matter, and many feel Evan is erasing their history without their consent, all for a western idea. Bill Pacer of the University of Hawaii at Manoa says that Evan Wei’s goal is to rescue history from China and Japan. He says that Wei’s project is based on the idea that society must hear individualized stories to move beyond the trap of history.
Victor P. Lowenson at UC Berkeley thinks Wei has crossed the line from historian to activist. With the Kirino Process, there is no way to confirm the veracity of the events. The moment can never be replicated, which means rational inquiry has become personal religion. Ienaga Ito from Kyoto University says narratives are subjective and that Evan was more radical than people thought, transforming historical narrative into memoir. In doing so, he has tried to introduce empathy and emotion into historical inquiry.
On the show “Crosstalk,” Ambassador Yoshida and Dr. Wei appear, butting heads about the issue. Dr. Wei wants Japan to acknowledge the truth; Yoshida claims it has. Wei challenges Yoshida to go back in time and see for himself; Yoshida refuses.
At a congressional hearing, Representative Hogart says there is no definite proof of the atrocities at Unit 731, except “the results of some sensational high-energy physics that no one present, other than Dr. Kirino herself, understands” (422). Japan is an ally of the US, and so Hogart opposes bringing forth a resolution. Representative Kotler says his colleague sounds like a Holocaust denier and points out that the US is not a disinterested third party: “We have sinned as well” (423).
Lillian C. Chang-Wyeth, a witness, tells of her aunt, who died at Pingfang, which is why she volunteered to go back in time. She took her first trip five years ago and arrived the day after her aunt’s capture. She witnessed her aunt’s rape, and the last moments of her aunt’s life as she was pregnant and dying of syphilis. Lillian wants the Japanese government to acknowledge its crimes and the US to apologize for shielding the criminals.
Shiro Yamagata is a former member of Unit 731, and he relates what he and his fellow officials did at Pingfang. He talks about how they performed scientific experiments on them, which included studying syphilis by forcing prisoners to have sex with one another and amputating limbs to study biological weapons: “I believe that the work we did on the women was very valuable and gained us many insights” (415). Eventually, the Communists took him prisoner, and he worked at a provincial hospital. He encounters a woman who he recognizes from Pingfang, and she recoils from him. He then understands what he had done. He returns to Japan in 1956. He has decided to speak out.
Following the hearing, Evan didn’t make tenure and received daily death threats but was most affected by threats to his wife. The couple moved away, but he couldn’t stay away from the fight. He became obsessed with taking on all his enemies, but it was never enough.
An issue of the Economist says that many of the men from Unit 731 moved on to prominent careers in medicine and research, making “all of us the unwitting beneficiaries of these atrocities” (440). Japan and China continued to create a wall between one another. The documentary explains that the US shut down Evan Wei’s machinery for national security reasons, while other countries demanded use of the machine. The Comprehensive Time Travel Moratorium is signed. Dr. Wei commits suicide by jumping in front of a Boston subway train.
Dr. Kirino never told Evan that her grandfather was the Director of Pingfang. She took a trip back to see him in Pingfang in 1941. She wishes she had told Evan instead of silencing her grandfather’s story. It is 10 years after Evan’s death, and she says that even with the Bohm-Kirino particles gone, the photons are still out there, acting as a permanent record out in the universe.
Once again, Ken Liu sheds light on a historical occurrence that may not be known to many readers. For that alone, this story, dedicated to the real victims of Unit 731, is important. Panverse Three first published “The Man Who Ended History: A Documentary,” in 2013, and it was a finalist for the Nebula, Hugo, and Sturgeon Awards.
One strength of the science fiction genre is how it allows readers to put a microscope to global events and investigate history in a way that is more “comfortable” than just recording things that happened. People understand Genocide or slavery, for example, on a deeper and more universal level when they see the event allegorically through the lens of other cultures, times, and places. Godzilla, for example, is a lens through which Japanese viewers can contemplate the horrors of Hiroshima. Narratives like in Story 15 provide language and context for discussing atrocities, controversial issues, and human weaknesses. It shows, also, the power of storytelling for contextualizing history. That is Evan’s goal; to contextualize an atrocity using time travelers’ eyewitness accounts.
The story is also about the intersection of politics, science, and activism. Though some want to see science as pure, within a vacuum, there are always human consequences. There are consequences at Pingfang, where doctors saw nothing wrong with killing prisoners in the name of learning something for the greater good, and for Evan’s volunteers, as Wei’s technology opens doors to one person, but closes them for the rest of the world. Evan Wei’s lofty ideas of uncovering the horrid things done to the prisoners are soon marred by the pushback he receives from the limitations of the technology he and his wife have created. As his wife notes:
A great responsibility had been thrust upon him, and he had failed them. He was trying to uncover to the world a great injustice, and yet in the process he seemed only to have stirred up the forces of denial, hate, and silence (439).
Liu touches on the contentious relationship between China and Japan, highlighting the similarities between the cultures and noting how their history has informed current relationships. Some critics have noted that Liu’s treatise on the matter of which country has authority over the site in question is not completely accurate, as Japan has recognized the area as Chinese territory.
Critics have also pointed out that it might be unrealistic that governing bodies would allow victims’ families to be the first to witness history through a new technology like the Kirino Process, especially if there is no way to independently verify what they have seen.