logo

51 pages 1 hour read

Ibn Khaldun

The Muqaddimah: An Introduction to History

Nonfiction | Book | Adult | Published in 1377

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Background

Historical Context: Dynastic Change in the Dar al-Islam

In the seventh century, Arab groups—a minor and divided people living on a peninsula dominated by harsh deserts—overthrew the Persian Empire and overran the richest provinces of the Byzantine Empire. In less than two centuries, they created a religious empire stretching from the Atlantic Ocean across the Mediterranean to the steppes of Central Asia and the threshold of India. This region of cultural and occasional political unity is known as the “Dar al-Islam,” or House of Islam. This provides the context for Ibn Khaldun’s theory of cyclic dynastic change based on group feeling.

For many Muslims, including Ibn Khaldun, the Prophet Muhammad’s ability to unite the quarreling Arab tribes and his successors’ (the caliphs’) subsequent conquests over seemingly more powerful foes was a true miracle of God (255). Ibn Khaldun, however, also saw parallels in it to other instances of the rise and fall of dynasties. In the Islamic heartlands of the Middle East, the initial four series of four caliphs gave way to a dynasty—the Umayyad Caliphate—that more closely resembled previous empires and lost that particular religious zeal that had propelled Arab groups to victory. The Umayyads in turn gave way to the frontier warriors of the Abbasid dynasty, who accused their predecessors of vice to justify seizing power.

Two centuries later, the Abbasid caliphs, faced with their own growing reputation for corruption and losing power in their outer provinces, turned to nomadic Turkish groups from the steppes of Central Asia to provide military might. These Turkish groups, with a reputation for fierceness and tribal loyalty, successfully intimidated the Abbasids’ enemies but ultimately used their position to effectively take over political power from the Abbasid caliphs (who lived on as isolated puppets). Ibn Khaldun uses these events to illustrate his theory of the overthrow of corrupt dynasties by dynamic newcomers from poorer peripheries.

Ibn Khaldun participated in the power struggles between the dynasties of the Maghrib: the Hafsids of his native Tunis, the Merenids in Morocco, and the minor power of Tlemcen. He lived in both city and desert, and even attempted to raise an army of desert tribesmen in service of the Tlemcen sultan. While their history did not perhaps fit into the dynastic cycle as neatly as the Middle Eastern caliphates, the old dynasties had a growing fragility readily apparent to Ibn Khaldun as he navigated the political scene. Most of Ibn Khaldun’s examples come from the history of these regions, as well as narratives from the Hebrew Bible and Qur’an. They offered a pattern which inspired his theory of the rise and fall of dynasties in accord with group feeling.

Intellectual Context: Culture in the Dar al-Islam

When the Muslim Arab groups first conquered Persia and the Byzantine lands of Syria and Egypt, they gained access to some of the most dynamic intellectual centers of the late ancient world, including Christian Alexandria in Egypt. They had access to Mesopotamian science dating back to ancient Babylon, Egyptian knowledge, and the Hellenistic synthesis of these traditions with Greek philosophy and science. Muslims continued these intellectual traditions and built upon them. Islam created elements of a shared intellectual culture spanning thousands of miles within this new empire, including promoting Arabic as a common language of scholarship. This context created the framework in which Ibn Khaldun could develop and transmit his ideas.

In the Dar al-Islam, religious scholarship and other disciplines largely existed in fruitful harmony. The Islamic madrassas (advanced schools) focused on religious science but approved of, and supported, work in disciplines such as geography, history, astronomy, and medicine. Often these disciplines overlapped. Ibn Sina (also called Avicenna), for example, is most famous in Western circles for his development of Aristotle’s philosophy and for advances in medicine, including guidelines on experimentally testing drugs for efficacy. He also touched on politics, ethics, astronomy, and music, and wrote The Divine Pearl (al-Jumāna al-ilāhiyya), an extended poem praising the oneness of God and meditating on how that connects to creation. The Aristotelian metaphysics of Ibn Sina and Ibn Rushd did attract increasing criticism from religious conservatives in Ibn Khaldun’s time. Limits existed when philosophy clashed with common religious viewpoints; Ibn Khaldun makes clear that he thinks Ibn Sina and Ibn Rushd went too far but he, like most Muslim scholars, did not reject philosophical science wholesale because of it.

Within this range of traditions and scholarship, Ibn Khaldun also acknowledges his debt to Greek thinkers, especially Aristotle. He calls Aristotle “First Teacher” (400) and lauds his logical achievements, although offering caution about his metaphysics. When Ibn Khaldun claims to be inventing an entirely new science, he explicitly acknowledges substantial overlap with what he has learned from Aristotle but claims the Greek philosopher “is not exhaustive” and does not use “all the arguments it deserves” (41). His theories do indeed go beyond what Aristotle had written and provide new arguments. At the same time, he directly borrows important ideas, such as humans as rational and political animals who gain knowledge from sense perception, the distinction of crafts from sciences, and the intellectual tools of logic.

Other aspects of Ibn Khaldun’s work, such as his cosmology and geography, can be traced back through Muslim writers to Greek Christian scholars and, ultimately, the achievements of pre-Christian ancient Greeks. Within his contemporary setting, Ibn Khaldun’s engagement with the thought of earlier Muslims, such as Ibn Sina, opens a window into the dynamism and contours of intellectual debates in the 14th-century Muslim world.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
blurred text