70 pages • 2 hours read
Oscar WildeA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more. For select classroom titles, we also provide Teaching Guides with discussion and quiz questions to prompt student engagement.
The use of alter egos by the two main characters, Jack and Algernon, drives the plot of the play. Jack uses the alias “Ernest” and, in this way, manages to have his fun in the city without stories of his bad behavior attaching to his real name and ruining his reputation in the country. This strategy backfires when his young ward Cecily turns out to have fallen in love with “Ernest” wholly due to tales of his ill repute. Instead of insulating Cecily from moral turpitude, Jack has primed her to marry a debauched young man like Algernon.
Meanwhile, Algernon invents a whole other imaginary person, Mr. Bunbury, whose frequent illness gives Algernon a pretext to escape his social obligations. Algernon later displays his ease in assuming or discarding an identity by pretending to be Ernest when he shows up to Jack’s country estate.
Both men, then, pretend to be Ernest when convenient, effectively swapping the role depending on their location. This relationship to the name “Ernest” belies the relationship between the men: they are essentially the same person. Since “Ernest’s” escapades, as described to Cecily, are actually Jack’s, Algernon should not be able to pretend to be Ernest so easily unless a rough account of each man’s life in London is indistinguishable. Jack is concerned to maintain the image of his moral probity in the country, but the reality is that Jack is just as degenerate as Algernon.
The existence of the alter ego of Ernest takes a farcical twist when it is revealed that Jack’s name really is Ernest after all. Jack has gone from an invented Ernest at the start of the play, to Jack in the middle, to a real Ernest at the end.
The entire plot of the play revolves around social obligations, marriage in particular, and the complications that arise from Jack and Algernon’s attempts to avoid theirs. At the start of the play Jack’s use of the pseudonym Ernest in London has allowed him to act poorly in town while simultaneously maintaining his obligation to present an upright character to Cecily. By “Bunburying,” Algernon has managed to avoid his own familial obligations, which seem to consist mostly of attending Lady ‘s dinner parties.
Young, wealthy bachelors such as Jack and Algernon would have been under tremendous pressure to find a good (i.e. rich) match to buttress their own family’s fortunes. Marriage, however, substantially increased the social expectations for men of this class. The time of their bachelorhood was one in which they were free to enjoy their free time and easy access to wealth to the fullest; and many would have been prolonged this period for as long as possible.
The class background of the play’s main characters has significant impact on the concerns around marriage and identity which they express. The main characters all belong to the upper class, but their sources of income are quite different. Jack and Cecily’s money comes from their investments in commercial concerns, whereas Algernon and Lady Bracknell belong to the landed aristocracy. Algernon and Lady Bracknell are, in fact, very cash poor–Algernon jokes that “half the chaps in the Bankruptcy Court are called Algernon” (56), and Lady Bracknell laments that “land has ceased to be either a profit or a pleasure” (25). Their class status is dependent on the centuries-long connections of their family to power and wealth. Jack and Cecily, on the other hand, belong to the ascendant class of factory owners and merchants whose economic and political power is rapidly eclipsing the old aristocracy.
As elsewhere, members of Britain’s landed aristocracy felt intense status anxiety in this period, as the old prerogatives of the feudal aristocracy faded away in the face of their increasing irrelevancy. By the late nineteenth century, the center of economic growth had definitively moved from the agricultural base which had provided the aristocracy their wealth to an urban, industrial base. Lady Bracknell’s sneering condescension towards Jack when he tells her that he was found in a handbag is representative of this status anxiety. As the landed aristocracy’s power declines, they cling more tightly to those things which distinguish them from the “nouveau riche” represented by Jack, namely family background and manners.
In the play, some of the stereotypes associated with these groups are inverted. Jack and Cecily live in the country, despite receiving their money from business concerns in the city; and Lady Bracknell and Algernon reside in the city instead of the country as might be expected. This reversal is also at play when Gwendolen and Cecily make jabs at each other about country and city life.
The character of Algernon has long been understood as a stand-in for Wilde himself. Wilde’s frivolity, attire, and endless stream of witticisms were hallmarks of his presence in London high society. Through Algernon, therefore, one gets a sense of Wilde’s personal attitudes towards marriage and society more generally.
Wilde married Constance Lloyd in 1884 at the age of 30 and had two sons with her, Cyril and Vyvyan. She was a fellow author, and they were both engaged in the dress reform movement. In 1891, however, Wilde met Lord Alfred Douglas and began an affair with him which was to last until Wilde’s trial for “gross indecency” (homosexuality being illegal) in 1895. During this period, Wilde preferred staying in hotels to the home he shared with Constance. Despite producing two children with Constance, Wilde was evidently ambivalent about marriage and probably married more to satisfy social expectations than genuine desire to marry her.
In both his writing and in his personal affairs, Wilde was provocative and challenged the conventional wisdom of his time, perhaps most notably in his 1891 essay “The Soul of Man Under Socialism.” In the Importance of Being Earnest, Wilde does this obliquely through the sly subversion of Algernon’s banter and absurdity of the characters. Most of Algernon’s most apparently contradictory statements are, in fact, quite radical expressions of doubt about the prevailing social and economic order.
By Oscar Wilde