61 pages • 2 hours read
Aleksandr SolzhenitsynA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
Solzhenitsyn reflects on the story of the Gulag. He never doubted that the story would be told by someone because “sooner or later the truth is told about all that has happened in history” (451). He knows many people who have tried to document the labor camps, but few have succeeded in writing everything down for publication. Solzhenitsyn, however, gratefully recounts his successful 1962 publication of One Day in the Life of Ivan Denisovich—a short novel describing a single day in the life of its fictional protagonist, a prisoner in the Gulag (Nikita Khrushchev allowed the novel’s publication in an effort to dispel Stalin’s “cult of personality”). Solzhenitsyn is grateful for the letters he received afterward from people who had endured similar experiences to Ivan Denisovich, but he was surprised to receive letters from people still in similar prisons, despite Nikita Khrushchev’s insistence that he had closed Stalin’s camps. He criticizes the Soviet government for trying to cover up the truth.
Solzhenitsyn considers Stalin’s death and its impact on the Gulag system. In the wake of Stalin’s death, Beria fell from power. Solzhenitsyn considers Beria to be “the Archipelago’s Boss” (454) and his death accelerated the camps’ closure. Gradually, the most severe practices in the camps were abandoned. Prisoners had names instead of numbers and were permitted correspondence with the outside world. Eventually, inmates were even allowed to choose their own hairstyles and possess actual currency to purchase items such as food. From 1954, an “easier time set in” (455) on the Gulag Archipelago.
While historians praise Nikita Khrushchev for dismantling many of the atrocities put in place by Stalin, Solzhenitsyn believes that Khrushchev covertly continued practices such as the Gulag. Though Khrushchev attacked the malignancies of the Stalin regime, Solzhenitsyn is appalled that the new head of the Soviet Union did nothing to truly dismantle the Gulag. Solzhenitsyn does not believe that the Soviet Union could exist without the Gulag Archipelago. He looks to current and future historians to document the ongoing crime against humanity that can be found in the Soviet labor camps.
Solzhenitsyn refutes the idea that most of the Gulag’s inmates were political prisoners of some sort. Very few were political activists, and most were arrested for vague infringements or false accusations. Solzhenitsyn describes the fate of the town of Novocherkassk, which revolted against the Khrushchev regime by going on strike. They were protesting the price of food and the lowering of wages, but violence broke out between the protestors and the army. Though the townspeople pleaded with the soldiers, the violence continued. In the aftermath, the stores were suddenly stocked with luxurious food, the wounded all vanished, and anyone suspected of involvement was exiled. The strike was called off and the workers returned to the factory. In this and many other incidents, suspects were sent to the Gulag, but they were not convicted as political prisoners. This minor difference is the only one Solzhenitsyn can detect in the post-Stalin era. Additionally, trials are conducted “semi-publicly” (465) rather than in secret, though “the judge is not at all interested in the substance of the case” (466). Solzhenitsyn criticizes left-wing people in the West for dismissing claims of Soviet criminality. Though Solzhenitsyn concedes that the number of prisoners is far fewer than in Stalin’s time, he believes that the law has not been meaningfully reformed.
As Solzhenitsyn wraps up his manuscript, he regrets that he did not first have the opportunity to share his account of the Gulag with others and hear more of others’ stories, “to put the whole in true perspective” (469). Instead, all he could do was listen to friends’ stories and incorporate them in his work. Solzhenitsyn explains that he had to write The Gulag Archipelago in secret and in fragments which he then kept scattered and hidden in various locations, as a measure to protect the whole of the manuscript if any part of it were to be found by authorities. He recounts a setback in 1965 when his archive was raided and portions of his writing were confiscated by the KGB. He wishes the book could have been more comprehensive, but writes, “I have stopped work on this book not because I regard it as finished, but because I cannot spend any more of my life on it” (470). He implores other former inmates to share their stories when they can.
In a short postscript dated May 1968, Solzhenitsyn admits that he wrote his Afterword in a rush because he expected to lose his freedom after he contacted his peers at the Writers’ Congress (a creative union of professional Soviet writers). However, he was not arrested. He has done what he can to refine and improve the work, but once more refers to the secretive and fragmentary writing process: “I have never once seen the whole book together, never once had it all on my desk at one time” (471). He thanks everyone who has contributed their stories to his work and insists that he has done his best to protect their identities.
Solzhenitsyn dedicates the final chapters of the book to criticism of the Soviet system. Even though Stalin and Beria are dead, even though Khrushchev insists that the camps will close, Solzhenitsyn refuses to believe him. He cannot imagine the Soviet Union existing without the Gulag. To this end, reform is not enough; he wants to eradicate the entire system, and his book is part of that effort. Little details, such as confessions that certain facts are unverified or that numbers may be exaggerated, should be viewed in the context of the author’s moral fervor. From Solzhenitsyn’s ardent perspective, inconsistencies and omissions pale in the face of dismantling a grave evil.
Solzhenitsyn does not limit his criticism to the Soviet Union. He also attacks any “progressive” (468) apologists who would gloss over the Gulag. Solzhenitsyn criticizes those communist-sympathizers in the West who are dismissive towards the horrors historically associated with Soviet ideology, and who, he imagines, might say that “none of this amounts to much. As far as [they] are concerned, this whole book of [Solzhenitsyn’s] is a waste of effort” (468). The book is an impassioned partial memoire, and not a thorough treatise—and so it does not spend time delineating, or even acknowledging, the various possibilities of less pernicious or more humanizing communistic thought. Even if the author were to have undertaken such a treatise, however, his extensive trauma might have precluded him from dispassion.
The Afterword and the postscript are short chapters explaining that Solzhenitsyn wrote The Gulag Archipelago under fear of reprisal. He was indeed closely surveilled (and once raided) by the KGB during the writing process, and he expresses his shock that, while the book is yet unpublished, he still managed to finish the manuscript.
Now many years since the P.P.S was written, modern readers have knowledge of how the book eventually came to the light of day—and the story of its publication provides validating context to the author’s unusual hypervigilance. The book was not yet published at the time of his writing the postscript in 1968, and its publication would indeed not have even been possible in Russia at the time, due to Soviet censorship. For this reason, the book was first published in France in 1973—but not before the KGB interrogated (and possibly murdered) his trusted typist, Elizaveta Voronyanskaya, in an effort to locate one of the few manuscripts still in Russia. It was learning of her interrogation and death that motivated Solzhenitsyn to publish the book as soon as he did. After the 1973 publication, the author was maligned by a flurry of state-manufactured hit-pieces, was stalked, and received death threats. Ultimately, Solzhenitsyn was stripped of his Russian citizenship and deported.
By Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn
Books on Justice & Injustice
View Collection
Fear
View Collection
Good & Evil
View Collection
Inspiring Biographies
View Collection
Philosophy, Logic, & Ethics
View Collection
Politics & Government
View Collection
School Book List Titles
View Collection
Sexual Harassment & Violence
View Collection
World War II
View Collection