logo

61 pages 2 hours read

Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn

The Gulag Archipelago

Nonfiction | Biography | Adult | Published in 1973

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Part 5, Chapters 7-12Chapter Summaries & Analyses

Part 5, Chapter 7 Summary: “The White Kitten (Georgi Tenno’s Tale)”

Solzhenitsyn switches the narrative to the perspective of Georgi Tenno, recounting Tenno’s escape attempt. The attempt was initially successful, and Tenno and a fellow inmate spent almost a month on the run from the authorities. They scrounged for food and stole to survive. However, they were eventually captured and given new, longer sentences. Tenno was eventually released from the Gulag, but later died of cancer.

Part 5, Chapter 8 Summary: “Escapes—Morale and Mechanics”

The Gulag’s security forces considered escape attempts to be “only natural, a manifestation of the waste which is unavoidable in any overextended economic enterprise” (379). Such escape attempts, expressly forbidden, were “rougher, grimmer, more ruthless, more desperate, and therefore more glorious” (380). Solzhenitsyn tells the story of two men who escaped from such a camp but were captured by local villagers, angry at the men’s attempts to live nearby. Once the villagers discovered that the men were escapees from the nearby camp, however, their anger softened. If the escapees had simply revealed themselves rather than try to steal, they were told, they would have received all the help they needed. The men were sent back to the camp.

Part 5, Chapter 9 Summary: “The Kids with Tommy Guns”

Of all the ranks of guards at the camp, the lowest ranking was the “robust youngsters born during the First Five-Year Plan” (383). They did not fight in the war and prided themselves on their shiny new Tommy guns. The young men knew little about the prisoners, but they unreservedly followed their orders to shoot. They were given lessons in political ideology which taught them to see the inmates as unforgivable criminals and fascists, rather than innocent victims. They came to resent the inmates, even though they knew nothing about them and even though they were relatively well-paid for their work.

Part 5, Chapter 10 Summary: “Behind the Wire the Ground Is Burning”

Mutinies and uprisings were not uncommon in the Gulag, but the history of such events has been deliberately hidden. Solzhenitsyn discusses some of these uprisings. An uprising in the public works site No. 501 was organized by ex-soldiers who killed the convoy guards, removed the sentries, and stole weapons from the barracks. After liberating their own camp, they decided to help those in a nearby camp but were stopped when troops parachuted into the area. Most of the rebels were shot, the others had their sentences extended or doubled. As more inmates began to realize that they have strength in numbers, however, the uprisings became more frequent and “the age of rebellion” (388) began.

Solzhenitsyn admits that violence goes against his humanist instincts, but he insists that anyone who has not experienced the Gulag cannot understand the necessity of fighting back. Once the inmates realized their innate power, they began killing informers and others they considered traitorous. The dynamic in the camp changed; the guards suddenly lacked information and any informers were terrified for their lives. The prisoners became increasingly confident and the guards’ attempts to quell the uprising failed.

Part 5, Chapter 11 Summary: “Tearing at the Chains”

Solzhenitsyn continues his story of the uprising in his camp:

The inmates continued with their work duties and wondered how they should use their newfound power. A group tried to set fire to a cell containing informers who had been torturing the other inmates. The guard towers opened fire on the rest of the prisoners, many of whom were oblivious to the uprising. Soldiers storm the prison and the inmates tried to flee to their bunks amid the chaos. In the aftermath, the inmates launched a hunger strike. Solzhenitsyn joined them, even though he only had one year of his sentence remaining. The strike continued for three days, forcing the guards to listen to the prisoners’ demands. However, some of the inmates broke their strike. The rest lost hope and were quick to follow. Though they did not get everything they wanted, the inmates succeeded in altering the mood of the camp. They began to realize their power and their prison “ceased to belong to the Archipelago” (402). At the beginning of the 1950s, faults appeared in the foundation of the Gulag system. The deaths of Stalin and Beria exacerbated the issues.

Part 5, Chapter 12 Summary: “The Forty Days of Kengir”

Solzhenitsyn remembers how the mood in the camps changed, both after the initial uprisings and after political changes in Soviet society. In the aftermath of Beria’s fall from grace and execution, as well as the death of Stalin in 1953, the authorities running the Gulag system became less focused. The guards executed more inmates, but the inmates had a greater sense of their own importance. Hunger and work strikes became more frequent, so the security forces decided to mix the political inmates with the criminals. They hoped that by mixing the two groups, they would diminish the uprisings among the political inmates. Instead, the security forces created “the biggest mutiny in the history of the Gulag Archipelago” (405). The political inmates and the criminals formed an alliance.

As the camp seethed with rebellion, a delegation arrives to bargain with them. The inmates were buoyed simply by the fact that the security forces were willing to listen. The inmates demanded that murderers be put on trial, that the numbers be removed from the huts, that the huts not be locked, and that the women of the camp should not be beaten. Though the demands were initially met, violence broke out. The 8,000 inmates overran the guards and established a committee to negotiate with the authorities. They wanted better treatment, better working conditions, and the right to correspond with their relatives outside the camp. The negotiators could not accede to the demands, but instead made empty promises—which the inmates rejected, and the two sides entered a long stand-off lasting more than a month.

As troops gathered outside the camp, the inmates assumed that they would soon be overrun by soldiers. The inmates became hopeful when the soldiers told them that their demands had been met; however, the soldiers invaded the camp the next day and killed hundreds of inmates. The inmates fought back but succumbed to the soldiers’ tanks. In the following days, the surviving prisoners were made to dismantle their barricades before being put back to work.

Part 5, Chapters 7-12 Analysis

Solzhenitsyn finishes Tenno’s story with a note that he died after his release. Tenno never succeeded in his escape, but the attempts gave his life meaning. Without the challenge of escape, Tenno faded away into a boring, quiet death. As with many of the people who survive to the end of their sentence, Tenno struggled with life in the outside world. Even when people are no longer held inside the Gulag, its psychological oppression lingers. After Tenno left the camp, his life lacked the contours which gave him purpose, and his imprisonment stayed with him as a kind of refractory spiritual malaise.

Solzhenitsyn describes the young guards with a mixture of hatred and pity. These young men bullied and assaulted him, but he cannot bring himself to truly loathe them. They were products of an immoral society, in his view, so their actions must be accordingly contextualized. The young guards were taught, through the Soviet ideology, to dehumanize the inmates, dismissing them as criminals and fascists. This dehumanization only validates Solzhenitsyn’s belief in Soviet evil.

The prisoners’ revolt resembles Tenno’s escapes. Like Tenno, the inmates sought to reclaim their agency. Refusing to exist on the Gulag’s terms, they revolted. They realized that the inmates outnumbered guards, so their popular uprising echoes the Russian Revolution. Solzhenitsyn subtly hints at the irony of the prisoners’ revolt, as they challenged the Soviet institution, an institution established through a past popular uprising. Unlike the Russian Revolution, the prisoners’ revolt failed. They could not stand up to the violence of the Soviet system. Once again, Solzhenitsyn frames this as a validation of his criticisms.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
blurred text