56 pages • 1 hour read
Leslie JamisonA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
As Jamison explores the concept of empathy throughout her essay collection, she features instances in which empathy is necessary as well as instances where empathy is difficult to achieve. In doing so, Jamison presents the reader with an honest depiction of navigating the social strain related to trauma and illness. Jamison does not present moral judgments but highlights the need to pursue empathy even in light of external factors or personal beliefs. She constructs the argument that empathy is always accessible, and making the active choice to uphold empathy is the first step toward generating an environment conducive to healing.
Jamison first grapples with the difficult but vital nature of empathy when she opens the essay collection, using her own experiences with undergoing an abortion and having open heart surgery shortly after. She grapples with the weight of these procedures, contrasting the abruptness of her heart doctor with the nameless gynecologist, the former showing very little empathy while the latter showed empathy through his actions. As Jamison struggles to connect with her lover after the abortion, she describes how she assesses him on the empathy he displays, finding him lacking but also exhausted with the effort of trying to quantify the connection she had with him. It is only after her surgeries and after reflection that she notes “[e]mpathy isn’t just something that happens to us […] it’s also a choice we make: to pay attention, to extend ourselves” (23). By recognizing the ways in which her lover made the choice to support her and remain connected with her, she can change her perspective on empathy, understanding that choice is a fundamental component.
For the rest of the collection, the reader can see Jamison consistently choosing empathy, which reinforces that, despite difficulties, choosing it is a necessary step. For example, in “Devil’s Bait,” Jamison does not believe in the truth of Morgellons disease but does believe the patients are experiencing pain. She connects with them on that level of discomfort and lack of clarity, wishing they achieve healing. She establishes a strong empathetic connection with the West Memphis Three through the lens of the documentary, highlighting how a personal bond is not necessary to construct such a connection. She chooses to reach out to Charlie Echols during his imprisonment, visiting him and receiving his stories without judgment. Jamison even displays moments when empathy is difficult or uncomfortable but highlights the need to access it anyway. This is exemplified when she is forced to confront her privilege while taking the Gang Tour of Los Angeles. Rather than seek levity, Jamison sits in her own discomfort, using it as encouragement to be a better listener in the future. Jamison models intentional empathy and provides a script readers can use to choose empathy themselves.
The Empathy Exams features both individuals and groups of people as they navigate struggles and trauma. In providing these examples, Jamison highlights the multitude of ways in which individuals in or seeking out communities find comfort and ability they did not have access to otherwise. Jamison asserts the importance of having a group of people with which to navigate difficult times, both to validate experiences and provide support and empathy.
This is reinforced by the community of Morgellons patients who gather annually at a conference to discuss their disease, which is considered a delusion by medical professionals, and seek advice with coping. Jamison notes that this “conference offers refuge […] from a world that generally refused to accept their account of what they suffer” (29). In this shared space, people are more comfortable sharing their thoughts, feelings, and concerns compared to the outside world. The patients warn each other of external forces, people outside their community, that disbelieve them. In developing a safe space for discussion and growth, the Morgellons sufferers create an experience that does not require the validation of others. There is comfort in communal suffering and a reprieve from the broader world that seeks to dismiss or minimize their symptoms. Jamison emphasizes the importance of this community by showing the ways in which she is not a part of it. Near the end of the essay, she writes, “A confession: I left the conference early. I actually, embarrassingly, went to sit by the shitty hotel pool because I felt emotionally drained and like I deserved it” (53). In leaving the community of Morgellons patients, Jamison watches it subsist without her and is thus excluded from the closeness it presents.
In most of her essays, Jamison takes the journalistic approach, inserting herself as a distant individual while making observations about other people or groups. However, in the final essay of the collection, Jamison also constructs her own community: a community of women experiencing pain and trauma. In preparation of exploring trauma in “Grand Unified Theory of Female Pain,” she “decided to crowdsource. I wrote a message to some of my favorite women asking them about their thoughts on female pain […] They responded” (211). Jamison, in a moment of loneliness and curiosity, reaches out and in doing so forms a community. This grants her access to the stories of others, provides her with novel perspectives and—most importantly—makes her feel a part of something larger than herself. At the summation of the collection, her isolation breaks, and she is able to move forward with her explorations while receiving support from similar people. This shows the necessity of finding or building a community with similar experiences that is able to bolster, protect, and provide empathy, particularly in the most difficult of scenarios.
Throughout The Empathy Exams, Jamison provides a wide range of examples of people experiencing pain and trauma, often including herself. This includes the emotional trauma of her own abortion (“The Empathy Exams”), the self-inflicted pain of ultrarunners (“The Immortal Horizon”), and the physical agony experienced by artist Frida Kahlo following an accident in her youth (“Pain Tours [II]”). Throughout each of her explorations of pain Jamison maintains the idea that each trauma is unique to the person experiencing it and therefore must be treated with care, respect, and empathy.
When Jamison first introduces the idea of individual traumas, she is discussing her abortion. She highlights that the man who administered hers also “gave twenty other women their abortions” (16). In saying this she establishes a sense of community. She becomes one of nearly two dozen other women getting the same procedure and receiving the same pain medication afterward. Jamison struggles to process the feelings related to her procedure. She displays confidence while inwardly she battles her feelings, as exemplified when she writes, “The nurse will eventually ask, how do you feel about getting the procedure? Tell her you feel sad but you know it’s the right choice, because this seems like the right thing to say, even though it’s a lie” (25). It isn’t until later in the collection that Jamison has accepted the uniqueness of her own experience, commenting that “[i]t’s news whenever a girl has an abortion because her abortion has never been had before and won’t ever be had again. I’m saying this as someone who’s had an abortion but hasn’t had anyone else’s” (217). Jamison validates her own experience, acknowledging she is allowed to feel however she needs to feel. There is not an expectation of stoicism nor is there a need for repression. Jamison uses her own life as an example of individuality in the face of widely experienced trauma. By providing the reader with deep insight into her psyche and procedure, Jamison invites others who have survived similar things to reclaim the uniqueness of their stories. Jamison leads by experience, asserting there is nothing cliché about what she has been through.
Jamison showcases the uniqueness of trauma in another way by tracing the life of Charlie Engle. The reader is first introduced to Charlie in “The Immortal Horizon,” where he is one of the competitors of the Barkley Marathons. He is described as a “strong virgin” who has “been sober for nearly twenty years, and his recovery has been described as a switch from one addiction to another” (96). Charlie uses the adrenaline from running to fend off the adrenaline from past drug use. In an eerie moment of foreshadowing, Laz asks Charlie “whether Charlie enjoyed the prison section” of the race, which the runner claims to have enjoyed (105). This freedom of movement is crushed later when Charlie is convicted of mortgage fraud and sent to prison in “Fog Count,” where he and Jamison eventually meet again. In prison, Charlie becomes one of many, his movement restricted. Jamison notes that the prison “clutches men close—tallies them up, keeps them contained, seals them off” (138). Charlie’s story is one of many, the experience of a man incarcerated, but through Jamison the reader experiences the uniqueness of his situation. He is once again made individual for the duration of the essay, only to be once again swallowed up by the system when Jamison and he part ways at the end of their visit. Jamison reflects on the nature of this, of the potency of people who have stories and those who need to listen. This in addition to Jamison’s own experience with her abortion are representative of the potency of individual trauma even in the face of pain shared by a wide group of people. Each story matters because each person matters, and their trauma must be treated as unique because of it.
Addiction
View Collection
Community
View Collection
Essays & Speeches
View Collection
Health & Medicine
View Collection
Inspiring Biographies
View Collection
Philosophy, Logic, & Ethics
View Collection
Psychology
View Collection
Sexual Harassment & Violence
View Collection
The Best of "Best Book" Lists
View Collection