The Creative Act: A Way of Being

Explain why Rubin writes in versified and aphoristic sentences as transitions between chapters? What does this formal consideration accomplish?

Rubin calls his chapters “Areas of Thought.” How does this renaming of conventional “chapters” operate rhetorically? What effect does it have on the audience? In what manner does it define Rubin’s authorial persona?

Rubin uses aphorism, paradox, and anecdote to relate key concepts in his creative philosophy. Using textual evidence, describe how two of these three literary techniques reflect Rubin’s philosophy of creativity?

Rubin advocates for awareness and attunement to The Source for creative inspiration and momentum. Explore how these practices can be cultivated within the artist. How can the artist use these techniques to enhance their creativity?

Identify the limitations within Rubin’s philosophy of creativity. To what extent do Rubin’s recommendations misguide readers? How so?

Evaluate the persuasiveness of Rubin’s argument that art cannot (and should not) be imbued with social responsibility. What reasoning does he give? Why do you agree with this statement, or why don’t you?

Rubin provides an abstract and, at times, obscure description of The Source using metaphor, paradox, and mystical language. How effective does this figurative language operate to explain this concept? How persuasive is his explanation?

How does Zen Buddhist philosophy convey Rubin’s arguments about the intersection between creativity and spirituality? Answer may refer to author background and intertextual evidence.