55 pages • 1 hour read
Greg Lukianoff, Jonathan HaidtA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
Summary
Chapter Summaries & Analyses
Key Figures
Themes
Index of Terms
Important Quotes
Essay Topics
Tools
These days, three beliefs seem to have an overarching effect on the minds of students: “What doesn’t kill you makes you weaker,” “Always trust your feelings,” and “Life is a battle between good people and evil people.” Authors Haidt and Lukianoff believe these three concepts are forms of cognitive distortion, such as overgeneralizing, emotional reasoning, and black-and-white thinking, and that they cause students to become overly anxious, depressed, and fearful that disagreements and controversies are threats to their safety.
Parents, in an effort to shield their children from danger, teach them to be cautious at all times. Monitored closely, kids don’t have much experience dealing with the real world outside their cloistered homes and schools. They begin to see themselves as fragile and unable to cope with new or threatening experiences. Thus, they tend to believe that unpleasant experiences will damage them, which “makes you weaker.” On the contrary, child development research strongly suggests that young people are “antifragile” and will learn and grow from the small misfortunes of everyday life.
In an excess of caution, children are taught to “trust your feelings,” particularly fears, so that they might avoid any risks. This causes them to shy away from experiences and adventures that might teach them important lessons about how to navigate successfully through life. As a result, children grow up to become, not psychologically healthy people who can manage controversies and negotiate disagreements, but sensitive and touchy persons who cringe when confronted with ideas they don’t like or understand.
It’s one thing to listen to one’s hunches, especially in a dark alley, but quite another to feel a twinge of fear during a conversation and magnify it all out of proportion on the belief that any discomfort is a sure sign of danger. A wiser approach is to note the feeling and examine the possible causes to see whether they are truly dangerous or merely disagreeable.
In grade school we are taught never to accept rides from strangers. This doesn’t mean, however, that all strangers are evil and must be avoided. Children grow up thinking the world is filled to the brim with scary people, when, in fact, most humans are non-threatening. By the time they reach college, young students often have hardened their beliefs into an “us versus them” attitude that stifles inquiry and restricts opportunities to encounter new and interesting people and ideas.
It’s good to be prudent when meeting others, but to avoid people simply because we feel nervous will lead to isolation and paranoia. It’s more productive to consider that people aren’t always trying to cause harm and that their differing beliefs aren’t attempts to injure others.
The Three Great Untruths unravel when examined closely under the light of rational thought; this process can free up young minds to more fully explore, and learn from, the world. Cognitive behavioral training (CBT) can help with this.
The authors employ the old saying: “Sticks and stones may break my bones, but names will never hurt me” (210). However, this no longer remains true, as words can break today’s youth.
Parents, fearing their children might be injured or killed by outside forces—especially strangers who might abduct and murder their kids, not to mention traffic accidents and other mishaps—have taught their children to be wary of people they don’t know, and have limited them to supervised after-school activities. Meanwhile, school systems, under pressure to produce better test scores, have increased the academic load on students, to the point of assigning homework in kindergarten.
This emphasis on “safetyism,” or removing any and all risks, prevents kids from spending enough time in spontaneous play where they can explore, experiment, and generally learn more about how the world works. Research shows that children’s brains are designed to learn from new experiences. By fearing that exploration and unstructured adventures might cause too much damage, parents and schools take away from kids the very lessons they need to grow into competent adults. Instead, children are overprotected, to the point where even new ideas may feel threatening to them.
Fast-forward to college, where these same students now face the rigors of higher education and its emphasis on inquiry, debate, and critical thinking. Often lacking rudimentary levels of these skills, and trained to fear the new and strange, coddled students may panic at all the new ideas thrust at them in the academy. They assume they are under attack, and, pointing at the people who present these novel concepts, the students cry out against them. Ideas cannot cause physical harm the way a fist or a knife can, but campus protesters have begun to argue that some ideas and opinions are just as deadly, and that, therefore, the people who utter them are guilty of assault.
This twisted logic leads to angry confrontations and demands for redress over issues as minor as a flawed use of wording in an otherwise innocuous email, or the very presence of a speaker who holds views different from most college students. Some activists even go as far as to suggest that physical force against these people is justified as a form of self-defense. Thus, beginning with an overconcern for childhood safety, parents and schools inadvertently train students to become anti-intellectual and to attack the very ideas they come to college to learn about.
The antidote to safetyism and its fear of the new is rational thought. Cognitive behavioral therapy, or CBT, teaches some of the basic skills that underlie rational thinking, which in turn can reduce emotional resistance to new concepts, especially ideas of a political nature, and enable a more constructive exploration of these ideas as they are encountered at college.
The main tenet of CBT is that distorted thinking leads to painful emotional crises, and that replacing exaggerated thoughts with more rational ones can reduce greatly the distress of anxiety, depression, and a host of other mental dysfunctions. Distorted thinking includes: catastrophizing, or assuming the absolute worst about a situation; mind-reading, or presuming to know another person’s motivations simply from the things they say or do; emotional reasoning, or taking for granted that one’s feelings are solid evidence that something is terribly wrong; and a number of other irrational thinking styles.
The basic technique of CBT involves a careful questioning of the thoughts that accompany distressful emotions. For example, “I can’t stand this idea!” can be changed to “I don’t much like this idea, but I can certainly stand it, and I can consider whether it has merit.” Another example, “You’re trying to attack me with your words!,” can be replaced with “I don't presume to know your motives, but your ideas trouble me, and I have doubts about them.”
Researchers have learned that this approach reduces stressful feelings and leads to calmer and more constructive interactions with others. CBT is the most thoroughly studied therapeutic technique and holds the distinction of being demonstrably more beneficial than any other major therapy. CBT is useful also to people who don’t exhibit symptoms of anxiety or depression, as it can flag minor instances of distorted thinking, address and reduce the occasional emotional upset, and improve critical-thinking skills. The Three Great Untruths are central to safetyism and campus intolerance. Active use of CBT techniques can quell some of the extreme thinking that leads to overprotective parenting and safetyism.
By these authors
Anthropology
View Collection
Audio Study Guides
View Collection
Books About Art
View Collection
Community
View Collection
Philosophy, Logic, & Ethics
View Collection
Politics & Government
View Collection
Psychology
View Collection
Safety & Danger
View Collection
Sociology
View Collection
Truth & Lies
View Collection