logo

62 pages 2 hours read

Kati Marton

The Chancellor: The Remarkable Odyssey of Angela Merkel

Nonfiction | Biography | Adult | Published in 2021

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Chapter 16-EpilogueChapter Summaries & Analyses

Chapter 16 Summary: “Something Has Changed in Our Country…”

Chapter 16 details Angela Merkel's challenges during her fourth term as chancellor. In the 2017 election, Merkel’s CDU party saw a significant drop in support, falling from 41.5% to 33%, which was the worst performance of the party since World War II. Despite this setback, Merkel managed, after six months of negotiation, to form a coalition government with the Christian Social Union (CSU) and the Social Democratic Party (SPD).

The AfD, with its anti-immigrant and nationalist rhetoric, emerged as a major force, becoming the 3rd-largest party in the parliament. This marked the first significant far-right presence in German politics since 1945. Merkel’s region, East Germany, due to social and economic grievances, showed strong support for the AfD, accounting for nearly 20% of the vote. Merkel initially attempted to downplay the AfD’s rise, maintaining her policy approach and avoiding direct confrontation. However, she ultimately failed to address the concerns of disgruntled voters, especially in the East, where economic disparities and a sense of neglect persisted.

Marton discusses the lingering resentment over unification felt in East Germany, where the population felt left behind and unable to compete with a dominant West. Merkel, often perceived as out-of-touch with the problems of people in the East, faced criticism for her handling of refugee policies, which many East Germans saw as prioritizing newcomers over their own needs. Merkel’s attempts to engage with AfD supporters were inadequate and unsuccessful.

In her final term, Merkel faced increasing opposition from within her coalition, particularly from CSU leader Horst Seehofer, who criticized her refugee policies. Despite these challenges, Merkel remained committed to working out major differences. Nevertheless, she was shown as being increasingly out of touch with a changing and hostile political landscape.

Chapter 17 Summary: “A Partner at Last?”

In May 2017, Emmanuel Macron became the youngest head of state in the EU at 39. He was a liberal politician, who defeated the far-right ally of Trump and Putin, Marine Le Pen. Merkel saw Macron as a promising ally in the fight against authoritarianism and shared his vision for a united Europe, although their approaches differed significantly.

Macron’s leadership style was ambitious and impatient, favoring rapid integration and reform within the EU, while Merkel preferred guarded negotiation and incremental progress. Their differences in style and national narratives were paralleled by Germany and France’s historical approaches, with France being more aggressive militarily and Germany having an economic, calculated approach.

Despite their differences, Merkel and Macron shared a commitment to strengthening Europe against external threats, including from Putin and Trump. Macron’s calls for European autonomy, a single banking system, and a European army were determined, but Merkel was hesitant due to her country’s commitment to an anti-military peace program.

The relationship between Merkel and Macron was complicated by Macron’s bold, often unilateral actions, which sometimes frustrated Merkel. However, they found common ground on key issues, such as developing a joint defense program outside of NATO and supporting a banking union to prevent future financial crises.

Chapter 18 Summary: “Toward the End”

Chapter 18 details Merkel’s last years as chancellor. During these years, Angela Merkel focused on securing lasting policies and connecting with East Germans, who felt overlooked post-reunification. She acknowledged their struggles and insisted on her identity as an East German. This marked a shift from her earlier reluctance to discuss her origins. Merkel’s nostalgia for her East German youth became more evident, and she often spoke about the experiences that defined her childhood, including the sensory ones.

Despite her efforts, some East Germans remained critical. At a town hall in Stralsund in 2019, an AfD member accused her of leading Germany into a dictatorship. Merkel responded calmly, emphasizing freedom and her belief in her refugee policy, stating that Germany could not protect its wealth alone and had to think globally.

Merkel also addressed gender inequality. At the Global Forum for Young Leaders in 2018, she highlighted the absence of women in leadership, stating that they enrich both private and political life. She recalled her own experiences of condescension and championed women’s roles, transforming Germany’s political culture.

In 2019, Merkel visited Auschwitz, marking a poignant moment in her commitment to confronting Germany's dark past and combating rising antisemitism and racism. She emphasized the importance of remembering the victims and preventing such atrocities from reoccurring.

Merkel’s final year saw her embrace the role of climate change ambassador, as she became more vocal in pledging action against global warming. She also focused on improving digital access in rural Germany. By February 2020, Merkel was focused on understanding advancements in artificial intelligence, recognizing its implications for Germany’s future. Merkel did not want Germany to fall behind China in the technological area.

The COVID-19 pandemic further tested Merkel’s leadership. In a televised address, she urged Germans to take the virus seriously and implemented strict measures, emphasizing transparency and the importance of collective action. Her calm, fact-based approach and personal example in quarantining herself bolstered public trust and compliance. Germany’s infection rates remained relatively low. Merkel’s leadership during the pandemic was marked by competence and empathy. Her experience as a scientist helped her manage the crisis effectively, convincing Germany’s federal states to implement necessary measures. She navigated the pandemic by focusing on strengthening public health and keeping the economy stable, demonstrating once more why her leadership was essential during challenging times.

Moreover, Merkel’s diplomatic strategy was key in securing an EU-wide deal in which member states, such as Austria, Denmark, Finland, Sweden, and the Netherlands, that were not severely affected by the pandemic, helped those that were, such as Spain, Italy, and France, with a substantial loan.

Merkel also participated in her last months in office in a major deal between 27 states in the EU and China. The deal addressed climate change, financial matters, trade, and human rights issues. As Merkel’s last major agreement before retirement, it was an important effort to give Europe the possibility of strengthening its ties to a major competitor, China.

Epilogue Summary

In her final year, 2020, Angela Merkel’s focus remained on managing the COVID-19 pandemic, leaving her little time to consider her post-chancellor life. Despite the challenges, she maintained her global stature without scandal and avoided becoming a dwindling politician. Merkel missed pre-pandemic interactions but was proud of the German BioNTech vaccine, which was conceived by a German laboratory founded by Turkish immigrants to Germany.

Kati Marton reflects on Merkel’s legacy, which includes a more united EU despite challenges like Brexit and the pandemic. Merkel’s approach to leadership was marked by endurance and resilience. She never sought public affection, instead prioritizing duty and effective governance.

Merkel’s plans for her retirement involve enjoying simple pleasures like walks, cooking, and travel. As she transitioned away from power, Merkel left behind a transformed Germany and a legacy of competence, decency, and reason.

Chapter 16-Epilogue Analysis

Chapters 16 through 18 and the Epilogue focus on Merkel’s final years of her leadership, especially on ideas such as Merkel’s evolving political strategy in response to a changing Germany and her commitment to humanitarian values and global leadership.

During Angela Merkel’s final years in office, Germany’s political scene changed significantly. The 2017 election showed a weakened CDU party, while the far-right AfD became a significant challenger for Merkel’s party and an important actor in the German parliament. Merkel’s initial attempts to downplay the AfD’s rise and maintain her policy approach failed to address the underlying issues that fueled the party’s support.

The rise of populism and right-wing movements during Merkel’s tenure is a defining feature of Merkel’s last mandate, speaking to the limitations of The Nature of Merkel’s Nonconfrontational Style. In spite of the pressure she has felt from these movements and their populist leaders, Merkel has nevertheless refused to abandon her principles and policies, such as the refugee policy. While Kati Marton emphasizes the moral value of Merkel’s principles, she also describes the politician’s lack of awareness of, and limited understanding of, concerns that have drawn a part of the East German population into a far-right mentality:

That is ridiculous,’ she said once in an interview, dismissing complaints of post-unification hardship. ‘We in the East decided voluntarily to join the Federal Republic of Germany […] We wanted to join this system[.]’ […] Merkel’s was the overly pragmatic view of someone who denied that the ‘inner wall’ would take longer to demolish than the concrete one. The supremely rational scientist didn’t appreciate the irrational, emotional elements behind human behavior (243).

Thus, despite The Influence of Merkel’s East German Background, Merkel struggled to connect with East Germans, who felt neglected and left behind post-reunification. This demographic’s support for the AfD was a clear signal of their dissatisfaction with the status quo. Merkel appeared out of touch with the East German voters, who did not relate to her own story of moving to the West after unification. Merkel, while concerned with the fate of the immigrants, was nevertheless lacking empathy for the population that she had once been part of. Merkel’s inability to empathize with East Germans, despite her numerous attempts, has left post-Merkel Germany in a difficult position, as far-right violence has continued to grow over the years.

Overall, the last chapters of Kati Marton’s The Chancellor reflect on Merkel’s legacy, highlighting her endurance, resilience, and dedication to duty over public affection. Merkel’s leadership transformed Germany and prepared it for the difficult times ahead. Merkel’s ability to navigate the rolling crises of her last years illustrates her effective and principled leadership, despite the strains and limitations of the final years of her political career.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
blurred text