55 pages • 1 hour read
Elizabeth StroutA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
Summary
Background
Chapter Summaries & Analyses
Character Analysis
Themes
Symbols & Motifs
Important Quotes
Essay Topics
Tools
Content Warning: This section of the guide includes discussion of death and racism.
The object that Zach throws into the mosque is meaningful in several ways. Pigs are regarded as unclean by Islamic religious law, and the presence of the pig’s head taints the mosque in a symbolic manner. The act is regarded by many as a hate crime because it is interpreted as a kind of taunting or ridiculing of the Muslim community by a white person. Zach insists that he did not mean for the act to be interpreted as an act of religious or ethnic hate and that he took the pig’s head merely because he thought it would make a scary Halloween decoration, but his choice to throw it into a mosque makes clear that he knew it would have particular significance in that setting, even if he did not understand the seriousness of his actions.
As the novel unfolds and Jim and Bob are able to converse with Zach, Zach reveals his father’s clear racist sentiments against the Somalis. Both grow to suspect that Zach’s action was not so much an expression of his own personal hatred of the Somalis as an attempt to emulate his father to obtain his father’s attention. The act, then, takes on a new meaning, showing just how desperate Zach is for his father’s love and approval. Ironically, the act does draw Zach closer to his father, as he eventually flees to Sweden. There, Zach thrives and experiences personal growth in a way that he likely would not have had he never ventured out of Shirley Falls. In a further twist of irony, being an expatriate places Zach in a position similar to that of the Somali refugees who have fled to Maine: the connection between the two disparate groups gives way to healing that brings a positive resolution to the novel’s conflict.
The conflict that unfolds in the novel’s present day is impacted greatly by the Burgess siblings’ past: The death of their father was central in shaping who each of them became. The accident that killed Mr. Burgess occurred when Bob, only four years old, accidentally shifted the car into gear and struck his father. Bob has no memory of this incident but grew up plagued by guilt and remorse over his role in his father’s death. Though the event was completely accidental and no one truly holds Bob responsible, Bob is unable to forgive himself for what he has done. He lives his life in a constant state of atonement, attempting to punish himself for this wrongdoing. The car accident impacts his adult life because the trauma he experienced as a child is still unresolved. This is evident in the panic that Bob experiences when a Somali woman accuses him of nearly striking her with his car. That Bob refuses to drive the car back to New York shows just how impactful the childhood event remains. It symbolizes all of Bob’s doubts about himself and his certainty that he will never be successful (or at least not as successful as his brother).
When Jim confesses that it was he, not Bob, who struck their father with the car, Bob’s sense of self is completely changed. He initially responds with disbelief, certain that Jim is telling him a cruel lie. However, as Bob grows to accept the possibility that he may not have caused the accident, his life changes. He subconsciously begins to view himself as capable of change and subsequently takes steps to improve his life. That Jim falsely accused Bob of causing the accident speaks to Jim’s desire to be viewed as superior to others. It cements the way the brothers interact, creating patterns that are not broken until Jim reveals the truth.
The Prologue explains that Jim became nationally famous for his successful defense of Wally Packer, a singer. This case was instrumental in shaping Jim’s marriage, his self-image, and the image of him held by his siblings. The success of the case cemented Jim’s perception of himself as a successful leader. He welcomed the national attention, in large part because it affirmed for him the attributes he values. This attention served to stroke Jim’s ego, inflating his sense of importance as an attorney. During the trial and in its aftermath, Helen benefited from Jim’s happiness: She, too, enjoyed being in the spotlight and relished the way Jim shared details of the case with her, treating her as an equal and a confidant. Later, she misses the intimacy that they shared during this time. The national acclaim also solidified Jim’s role as a leader to Bob and Susan; though they had regarded him throughout their lives as the most successful member of the family, the trial increased their certainty that they themselves are not capable of handling difficult situations in the way that Jim is. They grew to depend on Jim to navigate stressful circumstances and life challenges for them. Because the national sentiment is that Packer is innocent, Jim is regarded as a magnanimous hero and a warrior for justice.
When Packer breaks the law once again near the end of the novel, his actions correlate with Jim’s personal downfall. It is believed that this time, Packer will be found guilty and imprisoned. This, coupled with Jim facing his own flaws, taints Jim’s abilities as an attorney, further tarnishing his own grandiose self-image. It is a meaningful realization, however, of his fallibility.
By Elizabeth Strout
American Literature
View Collection
Books on Justice & Injustice
View Collection
Brothers & Sisters
View Collection
Family
View Collection
Forgiveness
View Collection
Grief
View Collection
Guilt
View Collection
New York Times Best Sellers
View Collection
The Best of "Best Book" Lists
View Collection
War
View Collection