logo

62 pages 2 hours read

Parini Shroff

The Bandit Queens

Fiction | Novel | Adult | Published in 2023

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Themes

Complicity, Trauma, and Survival within Cycles of Abuse

Violence against women is so pervasive in this novel that it forms the story’s very foundation, for the aftermath of abuse keeps Geeta isolated, friendless, and defiant. Similarly, the constant presence of violence within this culture serves to drive the plot forward, first with Farah’s request for Geeta to assist in murdering Samir, then with the death of Darshan; and throughout the novel’s progression, its entrenchment in modern Indian society is profoundly manifest. All of the characters’ lives have been touched by violence, whether in the form of direct physical abuse or through the extortion of dowry. Violence is also found in the show of support for friends and loved ones whose lives have been ruined by abuse; or, conversely, in the communally enforced secrecy surrounding the shame of it. From the beginning, it is clear that many of the characters—even the women who are being abused—accede to participate in the often deadly silence that enables such an intractable social problem to be perpetuated. For the sake of cohesion, the community itself often becomes complicit in the abuse, and this trend also emphasizes the lower value that Indian society places on women in general. Within the context of the novel, only when the women take matters into their own hands does the abuse cease and the shame lift.

As the plot unfolds, the narrative reveals the powerful effects of the social mores that keep such domestic disturbances private. For example, as Geeta herself complains at various points in the book, nobody reached out to her when Ramesh was abusive. When Farah tries to talk Geeta into helping her murder Samir, she appeals to Geeta’s own experience of abuse, saying, “He drank and he hit you. I know he did. I saw. We all did,” to which Geeta bluntly replies, “But nobody did anything about it” (10). Later, it becomes even clearer that the women are the primary culprits in the unspoken silence surrounding such marital violence. When Geeta reminds Karem that his alcohol fueled Ramesh’s violent rages, Karem claims that he had no idea that Ramesh abused her. When Geeta suggests that everyone knew about the abuse, Karem replies, “All the women did! But I didn’t know until Ramesh was gone and everyone was talking” (45). Later, after Samir dies, the women pretend to be surprised by Farah’s revelations of abuse. This dynamic reveals that the women must preserve the status quo, for too much of their agency is still bound up with their male partners.

Abuse also begets trauma, and trauma interferes with rational thinking and agency. This pattern is compounded by traditional values that effectively impose different standards for women than for men. For example, in Preity’s back story, it is revealed that she has been scarred for life by the man to whom her family dooms her to wed. After he throws acid on her, thinking she is Priya, the twin who rejected his advances, Darshan “married Preity with her parents’ consent. Who else would have her?” (103). There is no question of forgoing marriage; this might bring shame or unwanted scrutiny to the family. In Geeta’s case, the return of Ramesh robs her of agency, as past traumas come bubbling up to the surface. Ramesh literally silences her without raising a hand. Saloni is well aware of the toll that this past can take, and she refuses to allow her friend to regress, saying, “He’s isolating you again. He’s taking away your independence again. No meetings, no loans, no friends” (270). One of the hallmarks of abuse is the tendency to keep the target isolated from friends and family who might interfere with the cycle of abuse.

Still, with the help of Saloni and others, Geeta quickly uncovers Ramesh’s lies and rediscovers her own strength. Even before she becomes aware of Ramesh’s thievery, she questions the ways in which abuse is couched in terms of tradition. She and Saloni discuss caste, particularly the reality of how difficult it is to rid modern India of this ancient system, and Geeta compares this to abuse, saying, “Like how husbands will hit us and we should keep quiet, understand and accept it? Is that also ‘tradition’?” (230). She finally realizes, after Ramesh returns and abuses her trust, if not her body, that she herself made excuses for his behavior. Now, however, Geeta will no longer accept abuse as a fractured form of love. When she shoots Ramesh, it is not entirely in self-defense; rather, it is for a larger sense of social justice, for she wordlessly declares her refusal to lend her complicity to this cycle of abuse. When Geeta later sees Ramesh, blind and confined to his bed with his alcohol, she suppresses her momentary flash of sympathy, for she knows that “there was no sense in apologizing for being a survivor” (333).

Female Friendship and Fractured Solidarity

Within the novel, the women’s various friendships are inevitably complicated, and sometimes compromised, by their relationships with men. Ramesh intrudes on Geeta’s friendship with Saloni, eventually causing a long-term rift; Farah’s unstable friendship with Geeta revolves around the fate of Samir; and Preity lies to Geeta about seeing Ramesh in order to enlist help in killing her own husband, Darshan. It therefore soon becomes difficult to form trust and solidarity when one’s own agency is constantly threatened by the presence of male power; manipulation is often the only way in which a woman can secure her needs in this context. Still, as the “bandit queens” discover on their collective journey, oftentimes it is only through fostering female friendships and engendering solidarity that women can reach the apex of their strength.

From the beginning, it is clear that the women are forced to work together, rather than choosing to do so. Even the microloan group requires them to consolidate their resources. When Farah does not show up for the weekly meeting, “[t]he women were somber; everyone knew the center extended loans to groups, not individuals” (5). Later, Farah uses this knowledge to her advantage, in trying to convince Geeta to help her kill Samir, saying, “But if we end up losing the loan, you’re the only one without a family to take care of you” (12). Their friendship is therefore tainted by threats from the start, though Farah’s attitude swings from one extreme to the other. She also tells Geeta, “Friendship can make things easier” to which Geeta retorts, “Friendships don’t necessarily make anything easier” (29). Indeed, the friendships between this group of women—Geeta, Saloni, Farah, and the twins—are complicated at best and self-serving at worst.

Geeta also recognizes that her broken friendship with Saloni has cost her far more than her lost marriage to Ramesh. Prior to the marriage, Geeta agonized over how best to negotiate between her friend and her suitor, for she “needed both of them to be happy. One would give her children, but the other would help her raise them. One would make her cry, and the other would comfort her” (37). Tragically, Ramesh never gives Geeta a child; he only makes her cry. Ironically, Saloni will become Geeta’s greatest ally—after a long period of abandonment—in her final fight against Ramesh and his lies. When Geeta finally realizes that Saloni is and always has been her champion, she gains new strength and confidence. Thus, the power of female friendship ultimately allows the protagonists to triumph in a world dominated by men’s problematic behavior and desires.

Farah’s fair-weather friendship pales in comparison to Saloni’s loyalty, though both women declare allegiance to Geeta through their actions. The circle of friendship also extends, if provisionally, to Preity and Priya. Before the death of Darshan, the women notably hold hands and recite the “loan oath”: “We are here to help our own and fellow sisters. [. . .] We will help sisters of our center in a time of crisis” (173). The oath regarding microloans has been coopted by this exclusive club, these bandit queens in the making, all of whom are trying to free themselves from the cycle of violence in which they have been enmeshed. As Geeta asserts, “We’re all trapped in the same net” (193). By working together, despite the complicated friendships marred by the interference of men, the women are able to free themselves.

Transcending the Stereotypes of Wives and Witches

Representations of women in the novel run the gamut from mothers and wives to churels and bandit queens. Many of these images are bound up with tradition and circumscribed by social expectations. Few of them describe the lived experience of the female characters in the book. For example, Geeta is not a mother, Saloni drinks illegal alcohol with her husband, Farah is a gleeful assassin and friendly extortionist, and Preity and Priya are eager colluders in premeditated murder. None of these women conform to the standards set by social convention or religious custom; they are not confined to acting as faithful Sitas, rampaging avengers, or hunchbacked churels. This innate complexity of the characters emphasizes the gap between the earthy, rounded, and complicated characters of the novel and society’s fixation on two-dimensional images of ideal women or outcast witches. One by one, the mythologies are dismantled in favor of more complex portraits.

While it is repeatedly suggested that a woman remains unfulfilled without children, Geeta contradicts this stereotype, contemplating her childlessness with equanimity. As the novel states, “She wouldn’t have done well with babies, primarily because she just didn’t like them very much” (49). While Geeta admits to herself that this conclusion may have been influenced, at least slightly, by her lack of children, she feels it to be truer than not. Later, when she and Karem are discussing family, Karem affirms a woman’s right to choose the best path for herself. He concurs with Geeta’s belief that “the actual saddest thing, the real waste, was a woman with children she didn’t want” (69). A childless woman, therefore, is not “unnatural,” contrary to the conventional wisdom passed down by outmoded traditions. When the women who are mothers—Saloni and Farah—discuss the pain of childbirth and the thanklessness of raising children, it contravenes all of the previous—and unqualified—exhortations about the so-called “joys” of motherhood.

Women are also supposed to be subservient to the desires of men, which remains problematic in a fundamentally sexist society. While Geeta and the others defiantly upend this expectation, they are still beholden to the rules, enshrined in law in some cases, of the society in which they live. When Geeta contemplates the success of her small business, she notes how the loan officer tries to instill confidence, calling her an entrepreneur. However, she notes that “all the French words in the world, however, didn’t cure the fact that she was only as successful as the men around her allowed her to be” (50). She is aware of the pressures and demands of the broader world, wherein men control public spaces and discourse, and this realization that women “needed a man in the house in order to be left in peace” (147) underscores the vulnerability of women in Indian society. Not only are they subject to abuse from their own husbands and family, but they are also victims of random violence from strangers. Ironically, many of their protectors are the worst offenders.

As the novel develops, Geeta and the others begin to embrace different images of women to emulate. They do not wish to remain victims; thus, they need a new model that will foster their own dignity and independence. Farah understands Geeta’s admiration of Phoolan Devi, the original Bandit Queen:

I think she was capable of anything because everything had already happened to her. She’d been beaten up and raped and betrayed so many times by so many. She was fearless because she’d already suffered what the rest of us live in fear of (116).

While Farah’s statement contains an underlying hint of threat, her observation rings true; she and Geeta, not to mention Preity, have survived inexcusable abuse and should not fear their own desire for retribution. Geeta even begins to reconsider the image of the churel, the witch whose “true form was always hideous” (297). She has heretofore believed that the story is one that men tell in order to caution other men away from temptresses. Ultimately, however, she begins to think that the myth might be one told by women for other women, “[a] way of terrifying men into considering a woman’s well-being from time to time” (297). If a man mistreats a woman, she returns as a churel; thus, he should instead be kind to her. In tandem with this conclusion, the novel also suggests, if a woman is abused enough, lied to enough, condescended to enough, then she will retaliate. Likewise, the narrative transforms these housewives, from a small, unnamed village in India, following their transition from downtrodden Sitas into bandit queens and warriors who enact their own reckoning. Ultimately, they seek social justice as much as personal vengeance.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
blurred text