logo

51 pages 1 hour read

Robert A. Heinlein

Stranger in a Strange Land

Fiction | Novel | Adult | Published in 1961

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Themes

The Intersection of Sex and Spirituality

Heinlein devotes a good deal of the narrative to sexuality, which the novel presents as a physical expression of love and spirituality and as an exercise of free will. Who copulates with whom on Harshaw’s property is neither questioned nor judged, as long as it’s kept between consenting adults and no one is harmed. When Smith finally engages in sexual intercourse for the first time—with whom is never revealed—he matures from nestling to adult overnight. Patricia is the personification of this intersection. Initially a devout Fosterite, she views sex not as dirty or shameful as so many religions preach, but as pleasurable and therefore good. Heinlein, a libertarian in his later years, sees no conflict between sex and religion, and Smith’s Church of All Worlds incorporates sexual engagement as one of its fundamental premises.

The Christian admonitions against sexual pleasure are partly rooted in the “secular philosophies that were prevalent during Christianity's formation” (Helminiak, Daniel. “Sex as a Spiritual Exercise.” Yale Divinity School, 2006). The Stoics of the time believed in a division between body and spirit, a division that sexual pleasure only exacerbated. Smith’s Martian philosophy argues that no such schism exists and that, mind, body, and spirit must coexist for humanity to reach enlightenment. Only by recognizing and accepting that harmony can humans grok the concept, Thou art God, a concept as self-evident to Martians as the concept of free will is to humans. Even the Archangel Foster is not above casting a lustful eye on Bishop Digby’s secretary. The prohibitions against sex create a paradox. If God created humans with a sexual drive, and if everything God creates is good, why prohibit a goodness? The prohibitions, Heinlein argues, are created by human beings and are therefore invalid. Sex is intrinsically human, after all, and rather than feeling guilt about their nature, humans must enjoy the fruits of their humanity. It is, according to Smith, a great gift, one that Martian society has never enjoyed.

The Spectacle of the Other

When Smith’s arrival on Earth becomes public knowledge, his “otherness”—as both human and Martian--prompts a combination of fear and intense curiosity. The government keeps him under wraps—both fearing his mysterious power and trying to decide how to exploit him—but they are aware that the public will demand to see this mysterious newcomer before long. The government’s public relations ministers claim, “If we don't show the Man from Mars in the stereo tanks pretty shortly, you'll have riots, Mr. Secretary” (7). A representative for a magazine even sneaks into Smith’s hospital room and offers him $60,000 for the exclusive rights to his story, although Smith doesn’t understand money or even speak English. Smith’s otherness is a source of exotic fascination as well as suspicion. Representatives of government and law enforcement track his movements even though he's not under arrest and he’s a citizen of Earth, free to come and go as he pleases. His foreignness precludes the authorities from assigning him the same rights as any other human. In the early stages of the novel, Smith finds himself exoticized and objectified as an emblem of otherness, his freedom of movement restricted by the proprietary gaze of the Terran culture around him.

Over time, Smith subverts this power dynamic, turning his otherness into an advantage that allows him to see his oppressors more clearly than they see themselves. When Smith and Gillian are fired from the carnival, the owner tells them they lack showmanship, and the ability to take advantage of the “marks.” This simple concept, while dishonest, is one most adult humans not only understand but have so internalized, it requires no consideration or forethought. It is Smith’s failure to understand jealousy and shame, however, that makes his philosophy so attractive. While most humans are saddled with some degree of guilt and shame—indoctrination from a repressive society, Heinlein would argue—Smith permits them to let go of it and act as their heart would urge them, for pleasure and happiness. If an average human had founded a church based on sexual pleasure and inner divinity, it might be labeled a sex cult and prosecuted. Smith’s otherness, however, gives him the unique insight of the outsider, an insight that lends authenticity and ethos to his message.

When Smith, at the invitation of Senator Boone, attends a Fosterite service, he begins to understand how he can use the power of the spectacle to his advantage. The service deploys theatrical rhetoric, dancing, “possession,” and speaking in tongues, and even a light show to dazzle attendees into unquestioning acceptance of the church’s authority. The entire service resembles a Broadway musical more than a meditative communion with God. Reverend Foster and his successors understand the human need for spectacle, to be wowed. Smith takes these lessons to heart when he founds his own religion, giving his supplicants a magic show before preaching his message of love and sexual freedom (although in a subversive twist, congregants are just as free to take money from the basket as put money into it).

In this regard, religion is no different from a carnival sideshow, and Smith also incorporates lessons learned from his time as a traveling magician. When he heads out to confront an angry mob outside Church headquarters, he dons his best attire, arguing, “the star has to show up for the show…The marks expect it” (425). While the carnival owner utters such words cynically, Smith simply parrots his old boss—sans cynicism—acknowledging the importance of showmanship without fully understanding the connotation. And taken in a literal context, he’s correct. The marks do expect a show and would be less open to persuasion without it. Spectacle supersedes the need for critical thinking, and subsumes it in fact, until all that’s left is a vulnerable hive mind waiting to be filled with any content the creators of the spectacle choose.

Individual Freedom as the Ultimate Social Good

Stranger in a Strange Land wrestles with the question: What’s more important, individual freedom or the common good? Harshaw comes down squarely on the side of the former. Isolated from society in his Poconos compound, he wants only to write his pulp stories and be left alone to agitate as he sees fit. For Harshaw (and Heinlein, an avowed libertarian), no entity, government or otherwise, has the right to tell an individual how to live their life. Governments that claim to know what’s best for everyone inevitably fall into authoritarianism. For Harshaw, the most important political value is that individuals must be free to make their own choices so long as those choices do not infringe on the rights of others. Smith, through his relationship with Harshaw, eventually adopts this view as well, developing a quasi-religious doctrine holding that all behavioral strictures impede the individual’s quest for enlightenment through hedonism.

The novel pits an overreaching global government against a band of courageous individualists led by Harshaw and, later, Smith. Early on, Harshaw emerges victorious by virtue of his wits and deft legal maneuvering. Smith’s Church thrives and grows, for a time, until the status quo (established religious and political leaders) begins to see his individualism as a threat. In a final symbolic showdown, the solitary Smith confronts a rabid mob, but this time, the mob triumphs, stoning Smith to death. Smith’s martyrdom—although Martian culture requires joyous celebration at his “discorporation”—is the ultimate price the individual must pay for asserting their independence.

In presenting a stark dichotomy between untrammeled individualism and statist authoritarianism, Harshaw’s political philosophy sometimes obscures the compromises that naturally exist between these extremes. Harshaw’s efforts to teach Smith human ethics (that it’s wrong to “disappear” people without a good reason, for example) make clear that these compromises always exist—one must always weigh individual desires against the needs and rights of others. In creating the Church of All Worlds, Smith and his allies are attempting something more complex than simply instilling a culture of total individual freedom: They are trying to collectively redefine the terms of the social contract.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
blurred text