logo

44 pages 1 hour read

John Grisham

Sparring Partners

Fiction | Short Story Collection | Adult | Published in 2022

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Themes

Wealth and Privilege in the Legal System

The influence of wealth and privilege in the legal system is evident in each of the three novellas collected in Sparring Partners. Across the collection, Grisham indicates that this corrupting pressure is pervasive, but not impenetrable. In “Homecoming,” Mack’s confidence that he can buy his way out of jail indicates that those who can afford both legal counsel and financial restitution are often essentially above the law. At the end of the novella, once Mack realizes that federal investigators are aware of his crimes and have secured an indictment, he decides to “disappear for a while and let things cool down” (121). Although Mack is guilty, he is confident that his “lawyers will handle everything, and with time, they’ll work out a deal” (122). Grisham is explicit that this deal will involve financial restitution, but not prison time. As an (illegally) wealthy lawyer, Mack can afford to fight his charges with expensive attorneys and to avoid incarceration by paying fines. The novella suggests that Mack’s wealth and privilege protect him from the consequences of his crimes, unlike the blue-collar criminals the novella’s prosecutors would never indulge in this way.

Cody, the protagonist of “Strawberry Moon,” provides a stark contrast to Mack: A once-unhoused orphan incarcerated on death row, Cody has no wealth or privilege, and the novella makes it clear that his legal standing suffered as a result. Although, at the time when the novella begins, Cody is represented by an honest, well-intentioned lawyer paid for by a nonprofit, his original legal representation was “a terrible lawyer. The jury hated me and I hated him” (134). Because he was an orphan and living in the woods at the time of his arrest, Cody would likely have been assigned an underpaid and overburdened public defender, who clearly was not able to help him prove his innocence or even be tried as a minor. The novella suggests that, had Cody been able to afford a better lawyer, he might have been able to avoid capital punishment altogether—as Grisham knows from his work with the Innocence Project, the death penalty tends to be disproportionately sought for defendants from marginalized backgrounds. The character of Cody is evidence that a lack of wealth and privilege can deprive vulnerable individuals of justice.

The final novella, “Sparring Partners” features a moving scene in which the gap between privileged lawyers and vulnerable clients is made painfully clear. After asking a jury to award his clients the staggering sum of $30 million, Rusty takes his fellow lawyers out to lunch at “a swanky Italian place downtown” (206) to await the verdict. Rusty orders two bottles of Veuve Clicquot, an expensive champagne, in celebration of what he believes will be a personal victory. Meanwhile, back at the courthouse, his clients, the blue-collar family of Trey Brewster, have a very different lunch: After feeding Trey through his feeding tube, “Mrs. Brewster removed two small sandwiches wrapped in foil and two bottles of water. Lunch for the poor folks” (208). Although the Brewsters have managed to secure expensive legal representation, they still lack the wealth and privilege to celebrate a verdict before it’s announced; when the trial doesn’t go their way, it is clear that they are victims of Rusty’s greed.

The Importance of Allowing for Second Chances

Each of the novellas in the collection suggests that transformation is an important part of what makes us human; second chances allow people who have made mistakes to be reintegrated into society in productive ways. In “Homecoming,” the protagonist Jake Brigance actively disrupts a federal investigation because he believes that the subject, his friend Mack, deserves a second chance to be with his family after abandoning them and stealing from clients. At every stage of the action, the novel implies that, despite his crimes, Mack deserves another go at being a husband and father. When he first hears from Mack, Jake assumes that Mack “wants to come home and I don’t know, maybe make things right with his family” (15). He assures his wife that Mack is only returning because he wants “to make amends” (15). Later, he tells Mack’s ex-wife Lisa’s family that Mack is returning exclusively so that he can “meet with Lisa and then maybe with the girls” (41). Ultimately, this turns out to be truth: Mack’s only goal is to reconnect with his family, and he respects Lisa’s decision not to see him. The fact that the novella ends with Mack successfully reconnecting with his daughter suggests that Jake was right to give him the benefit of the doubt. Although Mack is undeniably a criminal, he is humanized by his promise to pay for Margot’s college tuition rather than force Lisa’s parents to sell her house.

In “Strawberry Moon” protagonist Cody’s death sentence formally denies him the possibility of a second chance. Judged when he was still a child, Cody is not allowed to exhibit the kind of transformation adulthood maturity and wisdom might bring. Nevertheless, we see Cody turn his imprisonment on death row into a second chance of sorts: He grows into a thoughtful man who has spent his incarceration working to improve the lives of others; if allowed to live, the novella implies, he would be an upstanding citizen. His story makes it clear that trying minor defendants as adults is exactly the cruel and unusual punishment the Eighth Amendment to the US Constitution means to prevent. Cody’s lawyer Jack is being paid by an unnamed nonprofit that is an analog for the Innocence Project, a similar real-world organization of which Grisham is on the board. Jack’s perspective reflects Grisham’s own. His assertion that “it’s barbaric for the state to treat Cody like an adult, and it’s immoral to execute him” (164) is a thesis statement for the novella as a whole.

The protagonist of “Sparring Partners” is Diantha, the long-suffering unofficial third partner at Malloy & Malloy; Diantha’s happy ending in Zurich is only possible because she is given a second chance through her immunity deal with the government. Diantha’s time at Malloy & Malloy is characterized by her involvement in unethical or illegal acts. Some of these, like her affair with Bolton Malloy, are clearly not her fault: The novella describes her as a “twenty-five year old kid fresh out of law school” (222) when the powerful founding partner hires and propositions her. In other cases, like her active participation in the scheme to steal the tobacco money, Diantha is without a doubt complicit, implicated in most aspects of the firm’s corruption. Nevertheless, she is the only partner in the firm not to serve jail time because she alerts the federal government to the Malloys’ crimes and bargains for immunity. Ultimately, Diantha’s second chance is even better than her first: She is out from under the control of the Malloy men, she runs the firm, and she is the sole inheritor of the tobacco money. The government also benefits, as the Malloys’ crimes are revealed and Diantha pays back taxes on the tobacco money.

Personal Bias in the Criminal Justice System

In each of the three novellas, the personal biases of individual members of the legal system influence the distribution of justice. Grisham shows how deeply subjective prejudice permeates what is supposed to be an objective space. In “Homecoming,” a comical scene depicts the local district attorney and a prosecutor considering whether to investigate Mack’s crimes. Grisham attributes their lack of enthusiasm to the fact that “both had known Mack for years, though they were not close friends, and they were reluctant to get involved in a case that would send a fellow lawyer to jail” (94-95). In this instance, personal relationships color these professionals’ opinion in favor of fellow lawyers, potentially subverting the federal case. Ultimately, the men decide to prosecute Mack’s case; however, they do so primarily because “it was a nice change of pace” (95) from their usual docket of cases. Again, personal biases drive decision-making, rather than the distribution of justice.

In “Strawberry Moon,” it is strongly implied that the governor overseeing Cody’s execution denies his appeal for clemency only to curry favor with constituents, whom lawyer Jack describes as “law and order die-hards” (164). The jury, the State Supreme Court, and the governor all know the heartbreaking details of Cody’s case: An unhoused teenage orphan at the time of the crime, Cody “never pulled a trigger and he didn’t kill anyone” (164). However, because the governor campaigned “on the promise of more and quicker executions” (133), he ultimately denies Cody’s appeal for clemency, citing the fact that “the people of this state have repeatedly said they believe in capital punishment” (164). The novella suggests that the governor’s decision is a political gambit rather than a reasoned choice based on facts. Cody’s execution is depicted as a miscarriage of justice that is the direct result of personal bias.

The final novella, “Sparring Partners,” features a number of lawyers and prosecutors relying on their gut feelings and acting against the best interests of their clients and the public. Even the novella’s district attorney, who seems to be rushing to do the right thing, is comically revealed to be acting for selfish reasons. Houston Doyle, the district attorney responsible for indicting the Malloys’ pardon-buying scheme, is overjoyed to focus on prosecuting the governor: “[C]atching a governor from either party was an idea so delicious that Doyle couldn’t believe his good fortune” (275). Ultimately, Doyle’s goal is notoriety: “the publicity would dwarf every other case already on his crowded docket and any that could possibly arrive later” (275). As Grisham’s readers are likely aware, well-known and popular DAs can often parlay this experience into higher elected office—most likely the driving motivation behind Doyle’s exuberance. Doyle’s personal ambition affects his decision-making, leading him to rush the prosecution of the governor. Although the attorney general ultimately prevents Doyle from indicting the governor before his election, this scene makes it clear that selfish and subjective agendas have an important impact on the criminal justice system.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
blurred text