logo

65 pages 2 hours read

Patrick Radden Keefe

Say Nothing: A True Story of Murder and Memory in Northern Ireland

Nonfiction | Book | Adult | Published in 2018

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Part 3, Chapters 25-30Chapter Summaries & Analyses

Part 3: “A Reckoning”

Part 3, Chapter 25 Summary: “The Last Gun”

The IRA agreed to decommission their weapons in 2005. The chapter opens at an arms collection overseen by Father Reid. It was a tense scene with so many visible weapons and fears of “an ambush by dissident paramilitaries who were not quite ready to give up fighting and might endeavor to repossess the arsenal” (280). This fear was further proof that a threat of violence remained alive in post-Troubles Northern Ireland.

The same year, invigorated from his cathartic participation in the Belfast Project, O’Rawe published a book, Blanketmen, in which he relayed his knowledge of Adams’s sacrifice of the final six hunger strikers. Sinn Féin denounced the book as many others embraced and praised it.

Hughes died in 2008. He left behind directions for Mackers and Moloney: publish his recollections. Moloney did so in the 2010 publication, Voices from the Grave. Like Blanketmen, it damned Adams. Furthermore, the release of the book meant that “the secret of the archive was officially out” (284). The Belfast Project became public knowledge.

A friend of Adams’s requested access to Hughes’s interview tapes. This request exposed some essential oversights in the administration of the Belfast Project. Moloney and other Boston College personnel wanted to maintain the secrecy of the transcripts but had made some of their contents public. They had not discussed access to disclosed materials within the collection. McArthur had also assured his loyalist interviewees that the project’s existence would only become public after all of the participants died. These miscommunications hinted at trouble to come.

The chapter intermittently returns to Price, who, by 2010, was suffering from post-traumatic stress and addiction. She telephoned an Irish News journalist named Allison Morris and requested an interview about the disappeared. Marian tried to intervene and prevent her sister from publicizing the secret history and implicating herself. The result of the interview and Marian’s resistance was a watered-down article expressing Dolours’s plan to assist the Independent Commission for the Location of Victims’ Remains. A few days later, a tabloid ran a story that included “precisely the types of details that Morris had omitted from hers” (290). It outlined Price’s participation in abducting and transporting McConville and blamed Adams for the operation. The article also referenced interview tapes.

Part 3, Chapter 26 Summary: “The Mystery Radio”

Keefe returns to the question of Jean McConville’s role in British intelligence. The police issued a report in 2006 that denied any record of McConville acting as an informant. Voices from the Grave and Dolours’s interviews, however, once again circulated the rumor. Contradictions abounded. Police officers, including Campbell, denied the use of handheld radios within the force at the time of McConville’s disappearance. A 1972 photograph, however, clearly depicted a British soldier using one within Divis Flats.

The subjectivity of memory becomes apparent as Keefe discusses uncertainty in the timeline of the disappearance. The IRA, Price, and Hughes maintained a story in which Jean McConville confessed and went home to repeat her crime. The children recalled their mother’s detainment while out at bingo being only one night before her abduction—this version left no opportunity for her to acquire a second radio and be rediscovered. Police records placed this first incident in late November, while the children remembered it being December. They continued to attribute her disappearance to the humanity Jean had shown an injured British soldier. Police records, however, bore no account of an injured soldier in Divis Flats.

Needing more information to establish the true sequence and nature of events, the PSNI, along with the U.S. Department of Justice, subpoenaed Boston College for the Price and Hughes tapes within their collection.

Part 3, Chapter 27 Summary: “The Boston Tapes”

The state-sanctioned request for tapes induced panic among the Belfast Project’s interviewers, it’s director, Boston College administration, and library/archive staff. Moloney and Mackers argued that “nothing less than the principles of free speech and academic freedom” protected the secrecy of the tapes of living interviewees (299). Moloney and others suspected that authorities were insistent on receiving the tapes because they anticipated finding evidence against Adams as an IRA conspirator in a murder plot. The Belfast Project team had not taken the proper legal action to ensure protection for participants.

Boston College turned over the Hughes tapes first. A few months later, the college responded to a second subpoena and (after a court review), forfeited any and all tapes and transcripts that referenced Jean McConville. A judge reviewed the transcripts and ordered the release of five tapes. This batch included a recorded interview with Price, but it was not the one McIntyre had conducted; It was a separate (and secret) interview conducted by Moloney, merely housed with the Belfast Project tapes. It was this tape to which the Irish tabloid had alluded.

In conversations with Moloney, Dolours relayed her account of the McConville disappearance. Dolours confessed to delivering McConville to Dundalk, an IRA stronghold in the Republic, and leaving. Then, apparently, her superiors ordered her back, along with two other Unknowns, to carry out the execution instead of the originally tasked executioners. Dolours speculated that the squeamishness “was because McConville was a woman” (308). Someone gave orders for each of the Unknowns to shoot McConville. Dolours claimed that she missed on purpose, but watched the woman die at the hand of a companion. Insisting that she was disturbed even at the time, Dolours again blamed Adams for the decision and decried his public denial.  

After the release of all the tapes, the PSNI arrested Adams in 2014, “in relation to the abduction and murder, forty-one years earlier, of Jean McConville” (309). 

Part 3, Chapter 28 Summary: “Death by Misadventure”

In 2009, a “dissident group” calling themselves the Real IRA claimed responsibility for the murder of two British soldiers at military barracks in Northern Ireland (310). An investigation linked Marian Price, nearly 60-years-old, to the mission. Authorities held her in prison for the next two years. Such aggressive rebukes to the Good Friday Agreement were rare in the generation of IRA that had sustained the warfare of the height of the Troubles, but younger splinter groups still issued violent orders.

Police investigators questioned McConville’s Divis Flats neighbors but released them. They charged Bell, who had, according to Hughes, expressed a desire not to disappear McConville but to publicize her corpse, with IRA membership and aiding and abetting murder.

In his own voluntary arrest and questioning, Adams maintained his innocence. He denounced Hughes and Price on the grounds that they were bitter and lying about the past. Keefe notes that, “Adams had excelled at the fraught art of willful denial” (315), strategically covering up and publicizing family secrets for convenience and well-timed sympathy. He maintained that he had never joined the IRA, and therefore could not have acted as the Belfast brigade commander, or approved McConville’s murder.

Adams’s supporters in Sinn Féin mobilized to safeguard his image as a peacemaker in light of his arrest. A close party member and known IRA man bellowed a thinly veiled threat to anyone that sought to tarnish Adams’s image. Republican rage targeted McIntyre and Belfast Project interviewees, invoking the loaded term “touts” to characterize them.

Keefe announces abruptly that Dolours Price was unaffected by the threats because she “was already dead” (321). Her substance abuse ultimately claimed her life in January 2013. The chapter ends with a scene from her funeral in which old friends eulogize her and reflect on the trauma wrought by the Troubles.

Part 3, Chapter 29 Summary: “This is the Past”

The chapter opens in the Belfast of 2015: a city fissured by cage-like “peace walls” separating religious working-class communities from one another, but with a “cosmopolitan” and “prosperous” downtown (325). An official state report published that year concluded that not only were the active paramilitary groups of the Troubles still functional, but they also had access to weapons. The report also linked the enduring leadership of the Provos to the leadership of Sinn Féin. It concluded, however, that “the continued existence of republican and loyalist outfits didn’t hurt the peace process—but helped it” (325-326). The paramilitary infrastructure controlled a politically volatile situation by organizing and restraining members.

The chapter then returns to the case of McConville’s murder. The Bell trial lasted long enough that the court eventually excused him from participation on the grounds that his mind was failing in old age. Billy McConville died in 2017. He died before the state or anyone else could definitively hold someone accountable for his mother’s fate.

Keefe raises one of the most essential questions in the book: “Who should be held accountable for a shared history of violence?” (329). The government had not established a routine way to address and reconcile old atrocities. Part of the problem was unavoidable bias. State entities carried out investigations and trials, and yet people distrusted state authorities that favored certain groups and targeted others for the past half-century. Some people turned to civil suits with private lawyers. Helen McConville met with a law firm to discuss the possibility of filing a civil suit against Adams (though as of the book’s publication, she had not decided to follow through on the idea).

The Belfast Project fiasco disrupted the ongoing search for bodies by dissuading people who might have information from sharing it. Everyone could see that the consequences for recounting the past might land a person in court. Despite this challenge, the Independent Commission for the Location of Victims’ Remains continued to uncover bodies, including those of the triple agents, Wright and McKee.

Keefe gives the final word to Michael McConville, who proclaimed that his family would continue their fight for justice just as they had for the previous 40 years.

Part 3, Chapter 30 Summary: “The Unknown”

For the first time, Keefe employs a first-person narrative in the chapter and becomes an actor in the story he’s telling. He concluded during his painstaking book research that the person who actually pulled the trigger and killed Jean McConville was Marian Price. This argument is based on circumstantial evidence, and no one who knew the truth would confirm Keefe’s theory. Dolours Price and Moloney had, in their interview, concealed the identity of one of the Unknowns who Dolours accompanied to McConville’s execution on the grounds that the person was still alive. Keefe holds that the unnamed person was likely Marian Price, but the state (in possession of potentially condemning interview tapes) has never charged Marian because the testimony would likely be dismissed. All throughout the trials following the troubles, it seemed that a person could only implicate themselves, and not another person, in their oral interviews. An anonymous figure (Keefe knows this person’s identity but does not share it) even confirmed his theory, but Marian Price and her family would not talk to Keefe when he reached out.

Keefe ties up loose ends as much as is possible for an ongoing story. Adams retired from politics in 2017 after yet again recreating his image, this time as a “twinkle-eyed celebrity grandfather—an iconic but approachable grandee” (345). Keefe references Adams’s whimsical Twitter presence but suspects that the account reflects a deeper giddiness of unlikely survival and success.

Keefe then discusses the 2016 “Brexit” referendum, wherein British citizens voted to leave the European Union. Keefe explains that this restructuring of British affiliations and loyalties has the potential to “force Northern Ireland to make a choice” about new borders (347). He even concludes that a united Ireland might be inevitable in light of these political developments and changing demography in Northern Ireland.

Michael McConville again occupies the last scene in the chapter (in this case, the book). He continued to live in Belfast and raise pigeons, just as he had in his youth. He took solace in their both their simplicity and their sophistication: they can endure great physical trials in long-distance flight, but they return home and recover. Keefe does not digest the pigeon metaphor for the reader, but we have, by book’s end, witnessed the complicated concept of home in a place like wartime Belfast. The McConvilles continue to regroup and assemble when there is a significant family update, but, by the end of the book’s timeline, they were still waiting to learn what really set in motion the invasion of their home and its lifelong implications. 

Part 3, Chapters 25-30 Analysis

Keefe ends the book without offering much definitive truth. Part of this approach is determined by the facts of the various cases he discusses: Northern Ireland has not achieved many instances of truth and reconciliation regarding the violence of the Troubles. Keefe offers his own theory about an important detail in the McConville murder that opened and sustained a subplot in the book, but it is just a theory, and it is unlikely that it will ever be raised in court or satisfy the McConvilles, who still seek accountability for their mother’s murder.

Keefe leaves other questions open as well. Though he admits that Jean McConville must have had little to offer British intelligence, he never personally concludes that she was or was not an informer.

Keefe translates the pain of the McConvilles as they watch the state excavate for their mother’s remains, which they do not find. They watch Adams walk away from the police without charges and watch Bell get dismissed from him criminal case. Keefe always presents Belfast as a small place where everyone seemed to know each other. He routinely names victims, but none more so than the entire McConville family. Their suffering never abated, even long after bombings and abductions ceased to be a threat. Though Keefe opened the book as a murder mystery and offered steady details that complicated the intriguing story, the book does not end with a climax and resolution: Keefe leaves us with the brunt force of tragedy and unknowing.

This section also leaves open moral questions about many of the book’s key figures. Keefe admits that “it is hard not to sympathize with Hughes emotionally” (346). The radicalized mindset and commitments of his youth held devastating consequences. Leaders in the republican revolutionary forces convinced him that their struggle for independence was worth any sacrifice of self or sanity, and yet the articulated commitment to Irish independence shifted and outcasted Hughes as a dissident former criminal. Mourners at Dolours’s funeral lamented her failing mental health and the destructive power of her lifelong ideals. Meanwhile, Adams nullified the entire armed struggle and enjoyed an illustrious political career with no outward signs of guilt. Keefe does not condemn anyone as more or less reprehensible in their actions, denials, or reckonings. He suggests, as many have, that Adams is largely responsible for the tenuous but enduring peace in Northern Ireland, an agreement that ensured that there would be no additional McConville stories wrought by the independence struggle.

The final section, like the penultimate, focuses on the intense mental post-war experience of various participants and victims. If Marian did kill Jean McConville, however, she might be one of the only characters who was or is unlikely to show remorse over it. Keefe never indicated that she eventually turned away from a violent commitment to a united Ireland. As Marian and her family did not participate in Keefe’s research, and because Marian is still alive at the book’s publication, she is less of a steady presence in the book than her sister and Provos like Brendan Hughes who died and left behind interview tapes. Adams also refused to respond to Keefe’s inquiries, but as he occupied a much higher leadership role than Marian, commentators routinely discussed him, and he kept himself far more visible and active than Marian did.

Reconciliation and accountability also require scrutinizing the State. Though commentators continued to criticize police and military forces for bias and collusion, the political aftermath of the Troubles set a tone of forward-thinking rather than retrospection. The investigations and trials we learn about offered very little in the way of satisfactory conclusions and justice, particularly in regard to the McConvilles. The state-led search for disappeared bodies was meaningful and productive, but it was hampered by the continued secrecy maintained by former Provos who worried about implicating themselves in punishable crimes. The future of the state system at the end of the book is uncertain. Changing politics in Britain could usher in a very different course for Northern Ireland, perhaps achieving a united Ireland decades after a failed violent struggle for such an outcome.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
blurred text