logo

57 pages 1 hour read

Ty Seidule

Robert E. Lee and Me: A Southerner's Reckoning with the Myth of the Lost Cause

Nonfiction | Autobiography / Memoir | Adult | Published in 2021

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

EpilogueChapter Summaries & Analyses

Epilogue Summary

The subject of memorializing Confederates, especially Robert E. Lee, came to a head in August 2017. When the city council of Charlottesville, Virginia voted to remove a statue of Lee, a gathering of white supremacists staged a protest which resulted in the murder of a counter-protestor. Shortly thereafter, he came to Washington and Lee at the invitation of Ted DeLaney, the history professor who began his time at the university decades earlier as a custodian, to come to the Lee Chapel and discuss the general’s legacy. Seidule was anxious about the talk, not only because his alma mater was devoted to the memory of Lee, but also because Virginia at that time still celebrated “Lee-Jackson Day.” He decided to make himself part of the story, confessing his own acceptance of racist ideas and institutions, so that he was not simply condemning a long-dead historical figure but coming to terms with a part of himself. He told the crowd that Lee betrayed the United States because he refused to accept the outcome of a democratic election, and did so in order to defend slavery. It was an uncomfortable moment, but the truth is often uncomfortable, and Seidule believes that the American people are capable of handling it. There is now a more concerted effort to deal with the Confederate past. Cities across America have removed Confederate statues and other commemorations. Civil War memorialization remains hotly contested. However, an honest treatment of the facts is a necessary and possible first step in healing the wounds that American history has left behind.

Epilogue Analysis

In the Introduction, Seidule laments that the salience of Southern identity prevents an honest conversation about the facts of the Civil War. He hopes that his book can play a part in changing the conversation, but it will not do so on its own. Rather, it comes at a time when the nation appears more engaged with systemic racism since the civil rights movement, and is turning its sights on the question of memorialization and historical education. For all the ills of the social media age, its hyper-reliance on readily identifiable symbols and images may have helped to elevate the importance of such factors in maintaining white supremacy. A diversifying country is less willing to tolerate such blatantly racist memorials than one in which white people controlled public life throughout most of America. Yet there is also the simple hope that things can get better, that attitudes can improve simply by gaining better information.

Seidule himself is a testimony to this possibility, as every aspect of his life reinforced the myths of the Lost Cause until he undertook his own efforts to question it. There are also signs of progress in the willingness of Washington and Lee to invite him to speak, in the expectation that he would deliver comments critical of Lee. Significantly, too, Washington and Lee eventually made the decision to change the name of the Lee Chapel into the University Chapel and to overhaul the design of the chapel. This is not perfect, but it is progress.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
blurred text