41 pages • 1 hour read
Aleksandr SolzhenitsynA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
The setting of the forced labor camp, the purpose of the prisoners’ labor, and the characters’ backstories and fates all speak to the human toll of Stalinism. The prisoners endure extreme cold, inhumane treatment, and hard labor without proper supplies or safeguards. They are often imprisoned for spurious reasons, and their backstories illustrate the corruption within Stalinism. Both Shukhov and Senka were held captive by German forces during the Second World War; Senka spent time in a concentration camp and was tortured. When they manage to escape they are not welcomed as war heroes but baselessly condemned as spies. Another prisoner, Gopchik, was imprisoned for bringing milk to a band of rebels. He is in his mid-teens but is treated as an adult, meaning, like all new prisoners, he has been given a 25-year sentence. Tiurin’s backstory demonstrates how the government abused its power by eliminating a faction of the population. His story represents the millions of kulaks who were exiled, imprisoned, or killed. Baptists like Alyosha are similarly discriminated against and targeted: “What harm did they do anyone by praying to God? Every damn one of them had been given 25 years” (154). The prisoners’ backstories show the various ways that individuals were oppressed during Stalin’s reign.
The camp’s purpose is to build an industrialized town for free citizens of the Soviet Union. Two instances of situational irony assist in satirizing the gulag system and showing its human cost—the prisoners are building a new settlement called the Socialist Way of Life, and the 104th was forced to build the solitary confinement cells in the guardhouse. Using these instances of irony effectively criticizes Stalinist forced labor in an indirect way by demonstrating that forced labor camps are fundamentally antisocialist, a notion reinforced by Buinovsky’s declaration to the guards, “You’re not behaving like communists” (44), when he is caught and punished for wearing a civilian vest to keep warm in the bitter cold.
The characters’ fates conclude the exploration of Stalinism’s human toll. Shukhov, Senka, and Alyosha submit to the oppression they face. Senka’s pride has been destroyed by the violent oppression he has faced, while Alyosha has escaped into his religion. While he has a positive outlook, he is destined to struggle because he is unable to adapt to the social environment of the prison. Shukhov feels freedom will never be an option for him; ironically, life inside the forced labor camp is easier than his life before, revealing that political repression exacts a high cost outside the prison system as well. He feels that remaining a prisoner is his best option. Death represents the ultimate human cost of oppression. While no deaths appear directly in the text, they appear indirectly through references to the prisoners having killed “squealers,” and through the foreshadowed deaths of Buinovsky and Fetuikov, who both have failed to accept their oppression. The human cost of Stalinism, these character arcs argue, comes down to a choice between submission and death.
Survival and solidarity are presented both as contrasts and as codependent. At times, solidarity seems detrimental to individual prisoners. This is seen in Gopchik eating the food sent to him at night, so that he can have it to himself rather than being badgered by his squad to share. It is also demonstrated through Shukhov hiding his stolen trowel from his squad members; he can’t trust that they won’t take it for themselves, and he wants the trowel because it improves his efficiency and makes work more pleasurable. Various characters show an utter lack of solidarity, including Fetuikov, Panteleyev, Der, and the Limper. Fetuikov is too preoccupied with his own survival to think of others, while Pantaleyev and the other unnamed “squealers” are attempting to survive by gaining the favor of the prison officials. Der and the Limper lack solidarity with the other prisoners because they do not need to fight for survival; due to their high stations, they are guaranteed a better standard of living and plenty of food. Solzhenitsyn uses an allusion to suggest that the competitive, distrustful atmosphere is manufactured to ensure the prisoners do not band together: “Who’s the zek’s main enemy? Another zek. If only they weren’t at odd with one another—ah, what a difference that’d make!” (119).
Solidarity is also shown as benefitting the prisoners, primarily in the relationship between squads and their leaders. Tiurin and his squad have a quid pro quo relationship that is built on loyalty and respect. The squad members obey Tiurin’s orders, and those who receive packages give Tiurin supplies so that he can bribe the guards. In turn, Tiurin protects his squad members by securing them bigger food rations and better working conditions. Other forms of solidarity are more transient. At the end of the working day, the crowd initially turns against Senka and Shukhov, then against the Moldavian. On the march back to the prison, the guards are viewed as an enemy who, because of their slow counts, prevented the prisoners from getting back to the prison on time; however, this changes when they must compete against another band of returning prisoners: “[T]he prisoners saw the escort itself, now, as friend rather than foe. Now the enemy was the other column” (117-18). As with the artificial competition, the examples of solidarity in the forced labor camp primarily benefit the prison officials; the squad leaders control their squads, making the guards’ lives easier, and the transient solidarity is unstable, preventing the prisoners from unifying for long periods of time and sometimes encouraging the prisoners to unite with the prison officials. The portrayal of this theme demonstrates why the prisoners submit to their oppressors—a concept the novels directly questions in the line “Why, you might wonder, should prisoners wear themselves out, working hard, ten years on end, in the camps?” (64).
Multiple characters demonstrate the power of the human spirit. Alyosha maintains his positive outlook by devoting himself to his religious beliefs, which helps him accept his present oppressive circumstances. The Estonians draw strength through their close relationship: “They shared their food, they slept in adjacent bunks in the top row. And when they stood in the column […] they went on talking to each other in their quiet, deliberate manner” (56). Their portrayal demonstrates the importance of human connection in maintaining one’s spirit. The human spirit is also depicted in a negative light through Buinovsky and Fetuikov. Buinovsky has high levels of pride correlated to his prior position as a Navy captain; this pride leads him to break regulation and to talk back to the guards, leading to his 10-day sentence in the guardhouse and presumed death. At the opposite end of the spectrum, Fetuikov demonstrates little dignity in his desperation to survive. He, too, is expected to die as a direct result of his attitude.
Shukhov’s spirit is based on his value system; he prioritizes hard work and conservatism, and he restricts his thoughts to shallow matters. Shukhov finds joy in his work, which occupies both his body and his mind; he also finds ways to conserve supplies for later use, symbolized through the hacksaw blade. He finds human connection with those who share these values, such as Gopchik, whom Shukhov compares to his own deceased son. The human spirit is also exemplified by U 81, who, like Shukhov, has maintained his spirit through his dignity, particularly in regards to his work ethic and his treatment of resources. Shukhov’s spirit slips in a few scenes when he reminisces or considers his future, but he pushes such thoughts from his mind, distracting himself with work or with narrower thoughts, such as the good luck he has experienced. His spirit—bolstered by positive thinking, hard work, conservatism, and his social position in his squad—is presented as the primary reason he has survived and has been relatively successful during his eight years of imprisonment.
By Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn