logo

57 pages 1 hour read

Drew Gilpin Faust

Necessary Trouble: Growing Up at Midcentury

Nonfiction | Autobiography / Memoir | Adult | Published in 2023

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Chapter 10-EpilogueChapter Summaries & Analyses

Chapter 10 Summary: “The Class of 1968”

Faust knew very few women who pursued higher education, and school choices were limited. However, her advisors recommended several colleges, and Faust was accepted to Bryn Mawr, one of the colleges that constituted “the female equivalent of the Ivy League” (239).

Arriving on campus in the fall of 1962, Faust and the other 198 freshmen were given a copy of the Freshman Handbook, which outlined how they “were to be ladies as well as scholars” (242). Although they had the “lenient” curfew of 2 AM, there were strict rules regarding male visitors. Many young women attending the college recognized the disadvantages they faced but didn’t yet understand how to name and challenge them. Faust’s education at Bryn Mawr “was designed to empower” her but not make female students “think about [their] social or cultural place as females” (243). Bryn Mawr accepted that “it was a man’s world” (243) but hoped to give its students “the individual strength and capacity to prevail” in a man’s arena (244).

Faust’s classes included “essentially nothing about women” (244), but she was surrounded by accomplished female professors. However, many of these women also came from elitist backgrounds. The college’s first female president, M. Carey Thomas, believed in racial hierarchies and opposed any form of integration. She argued that “superior minds should be freed from the mundane demands of daily life,” which should be performed instead by “those she presumed to be less intellectually able” (247). Although nearly 50 years had passed since Thomas’s death, Bryn Mawr and its primarily white student body were still maintained by a team of Black maids and porters who lived on campus in poor conditions. As the student body became politically aware, these relics of the past began to seem more and more unacceptable.

Despite feeling “empowered” by Bryn Mawr’s expectations, Faust and her classmates were also “intimidated.” Many of them still derived “much of [their] self-worth in the attention [they] garnered from men” and “defer[ed] to men in relationships,” “student organizations,” and “academic settings” (248). The college never addressed these contradictory messages regarding opportunities for women and cultural beliefs of female inferiority, leaving its students “ill-equipped to deal with the barriers that would confront [them] as women beyond the college walls” (249).

Faust excelled in the serious academic environment but was also conflicted about her decision to study. After her summer participating in the civil rights movement, classes at Bryn Mawr seemed irrelevant and she wondered if her time would be better spent working for change in the real world. Bryn Mawr’s course catalog was not very expansive, but Faust pieced together a curriculum that covered Indigenous studies, Latin American revolutions, and American class structure and poverty. She used the final research paper for her classes to explore subjects more closely related to her political interests. When she encountered the work of Camus, she was struck by his message that “Life itself represented a moral emergency” (252). Unaware that Camus was inspiring for many in the growing student movement, Faust made him the topic of her freshman paper.

Although Faust sought relevance in her classes, she found it “mainly outside the classroom” (254). During her freshman year, she joined a meeting of Students for a Democratic Society, where she bought a copy of the organization’s manifesto. The booklet described the “disturbing paradoxes” that young Americans saw in modern society and called for “the establishment of ‘participatory democracy’” to realize “American ideals” (255). The manifesto argued that universities were uniquely poised to be “a force for change,” with students “lead[ing] this national transformation” (255). Faust began to feel like “being a student didn’t need to be so irrelevant after all” (255), and she became more involved in off-campus activism.

Faust’s summer in the South gave the civil rights movement “tangible reality in [her] mind—and heart” (258). She was deeply invested in the developing stories of 1965. On March 7th, Martin Luther King, Jr., attempted to lead a march for voting rights from Selma to Montgomery, Alabama. However, the march was met with violence, and several protesters, including John Lewis, were beaten by state troopers in an event now known as Bloody Sunday. From Bryn Mawr, Faust watched the state troopers attacking protesters and felt an “urgent obligation of American citizenship and basic morality” (260). When the march was rescheduled, she arranged to borrow a car with her boyfriend, convinced a friend to type and turn in her freshman capstone paper, and asked her sociology professor for permission to skip her midterm exam.

Upon arriving in Selma, Faust and her boyfriend joined the marchers in Brown Chapel. From there, they streamed out of the chapel, through Selma and across the Edmund Pettus Bridge, where the Alabama National Guard lined the road to keep onlookers at bay. They marched seven miles, and at nightfall, they stayed with a Black couple who had offered their farm as a campground. Only 300 marchers would be permitted to continue to Montgomery, so Faust and her boyfriend returned to Selma in the morning, where they recovered their car and returned north.

Back at Bryn Mawr, Faust faced the consequences of abandoning her academic work “with a certain satisfaction” (268). Her capstone paper was returned “covered with scribbled corrections and outraged comments” (268), but after seeing the risks that protesters undertook in Selma, she felt that “the sacrifice of [her] freshman English paper was the very least [she] could do” (269). However, the civil rights movement that Faust had idealized was already splintering. The movement was dividing, and “it was no longer clear where a white person could fit in with the movement’s changing directions” (270). The lack of “moral clarity” was heightened by the growing US involvement in Vietnam.

Chapter 11 Summary: “Instead of Happy Childhoods”

In the Vietnam War, Faust recognized the same American hypocrisy that inspired her to stand up against racial injustice. As the winter of 1965 began and the conflict continued to escalate, Faust and some of her classmates from Bryn Mawr and neighboring Haverford began investigating the war's contradictory details, including the Tonkin Gulf incident that escalated US involvement. Following the University of Michigan’s example of “teach-ins,” students from around Philadelphia organized “marathon sessions of lectures and panels” (272) to learn about the history of Vietnam and US involvement, “mobilizing [their] intellectual resources in support of [their] politics” (272). By April of 1965, thousands of people descended on Washington to present a petition to Congress arguing that the United States had “abandoned its democratic ideals” (273) by invading Vietnam.

As the conflict increased and more young Americans were drafted into military service, Faust and her peers worried about the young men in their lives. Deferments were more difficult to obtain, resulting in tense discussions among Bryn Mawr girls. Neighboring Haverford College had strong Quaker ties; some students there could be excluded from the draft for holding pacifist beliefs, and Faust recalls many debates about whether their belief in nonviolence extended to every situation. Their conversations also touched on the ethical issues surrounding draft evasion, wondering if it was right to do so when “many less well-connected and less privileged individuals […] would have to serve instead” (276).

While Faust and many of the girls she knew were close with men whose lives were shaped by the draft, she also recognizes her “position of privilege” (276). Faust’s gender was “the best and most absolute and permanent draft deferment,” a bit of “unwarranted luck” that “haunted” her (276). As the war progressed, protests became violent, and several of Faust’s classmates were arrested at demonstrations. Faust felt ambivalent about the movement’s move away from peaceful protests, and she instead became involved with an organization bringing injured Vietnamese children to the United States. She first learned about the project after discovering a photo essay depicting wounded children. She cut out the photographs and created a bulletin board display in Bryn Mawr’s main building, creating “an uproar” (279). Students were upset by the graphic pictures, and the photographs were covered. Faust wrote an enraged letter to The College News and began raising money to bring more Vietnamese children to the United States.

Faust persisted, but the sense of futility surrounding the antiwar movement grew, and students began gravitating toward opportunities for change “in their own backyards” (281). Faust was involved in different aspects of student leadership throughout her college career, culminating in her role as head of Bryn Mawr’s Self-Government Association. As students across the country argued for “greater control over their own lives” (283), Faust advocated for her female classmates in the Sexual Revolution. Enabled somewhat by the development of the birth control pill in 1957, women of Faust’s generation began to look at sex as something “natural, a matter for joy, not shame” (284), and ideas surrounding traditional gender roles and family structures began to shift.

When neighboring Haverford announced it was lifting restrictions on women’s visits in male dormitories, Bryn Mawr had to respond. As head of the Self-Government Association, Faust called a student meeting to discuss the issue. The college’s president, Miss McBride, explained “that rules were established not to exert control […] but to ensure student well-being” (290-1), then the students expressed the “varied perspectives,” finally concluding that Bryn Mawr students should be allowed to sign out for overnight stays anywhere they liked.

Other issues, like dress codes, were addressed through continued debates and conversations. When the time came to argue their case to the board of directors, Faust and the other student leaders “talked as little as possible about sex and as much as possible about trust, rights of self-determination, and the educational value of the freedom to choose” (293). The directors agreed to remove curfews for a trial period that was eventually made permanent, marking the success of Faust’s “little Bryn Mawr laboratory experiment in participatory democracy” (294).

Chapter 12 Summary: “This Is the End”

When President Johnson announced his withdrawal from the US presidential election on March 31st, 1968, Faust and her friends were delighted, sure that the war’s end was in sight. Set to the soundtrack of the Beatles’ Sgt. Pepper’s Lonely Hearts Club Band, 1967’s Summer of Love was a time of optimism for “the emerging counterculture of freedom and self-expression” (298). However, 1968 brought “assassinations, political turmoil […] [and] social upheaval,” creating a youth culture that was “increasingly embittered and alienated” (298).

The growing use of recreational drugs began to present an issue on the Bryn Mawr campus. In the spring of 1967, Miss McBride scoffed at Faust’s suggestion that drug use would affect the students of Bryn Mawr. However, before the new school year began in the fall, Miss McBride sent a letter announcing that students should “not plan to return” to college if they used drugs (199). As the head of the Self-Government Association, Faust was shocked by the president’s letter, and she “was determined that the college should abandon, not expand, any parental role” (299). Faust deliberated with the Self-Government board, deciding to intervene only if a student’s behavior threatened the larger college community.

Despite a commitment to maintaining student freedom and authority, the bad impacts of drug use were still felt on campus. More broadly, “logic and proportion were in short supply in the spring of 1968” (301). After Martin Luther King, Jr., was assassinated on April 4th, the country dissolved into violence and chaos, and Faust felt the loss as a “personal as well as public tragedy” (301). As she worked through the last few weeks of her senior year, “it was hard not to notice that the world seemed to be coming unglued” (304). Around the country, student activists were becoming “much more confrontational,” and “the power of mind was yielding to the power of force” (304).

Faust graduated on May 27th, 1968. Although her friends and teachers thought she would pursue law school, Faust was more interested in graduate study in history. She knew that the “assumptions and circumstances” of social forces from the past “often [created] silences and blindnesses that undermined human possibility” (305). She felt a personal and professional commitment to addressing the past and ultimately became a historian.

First, however, Faust was unsure if she could find “sufficient relevance” in continued education and wanted to spend some time “in the real world” (305). 16% of Faust’s original first-year class did not graduate with her. She calls these women “casualties of the sixties,” claiming that “coming of age as a thinking and feeling person in those years [was] like walking on the edge of a precipice” (307). Bryn Mawr’s dean would later describe to Faust the many nights she spent bailing out student protesters or sitting in the college hospital watching over girls recovering “from a drug overdose, or alcohol poisoning, or a suicide attempt” (308). Several of Faust’s friends “disappeared” into the 1960s, lost to Vietnam, the civil rights movement, back-alley abortions, or the obligation to marry. She writes, “I had managed not to become a victim, and I was still struggling not to be an executioner” (309). Despite the turmoil of 1968, Faust “remained glad to have had a time when [she] had a reason to believe, ideals to strive for, a glimpse of a Beloved Community” (309).

Epilogue Summary: “Free, White, and Twenty-One”

Returning home to vote in the 1968 presidential election, Faust reflects on the phrase “free, white, and twenty-one.” It was a common refrain among Hollywood actresses of the 1930s and 40s and a way of “claiming […] entitlement” and “asserting […] privilege in the face of power challenged or denied” (314). Freedom had always been of great importance for Faust, beginning with her childhood obsession with fairness and the liberties her brothers were allowed. However, she had started to understand the idea of freedom with much more nuance. She understood that others “confronted far greater injustices” and discovered the distinction between “freedom from” and “freedom to” (314). Faust’s freedom had granted her many advantages, but now that she was finally an adult and could live her own life, she wondered what she would do with that freedom.

The fall of 1968 was a “difficult” time “to determine a course for one’s life” (314). Violence continued to escalate across the country, and the presidential race between Richard Nixon and Hubert Humphrey held no great promise. As a form of protest, Faust chose to vote for write-in candidate Dick Gregory, a Black comedian and civil rights activist. Gregory received two votes in Faust’s county. Nixon won the county, while Humphrey and segregationist George Wallace nearly tied for votes. Faust suggests that this tally shows the “white backlash” as voters moved away from the Democratic Party in response to “the nation’s changing racial landscape” (318). Richard Nixon was the “law and order” candidate, suggesting that Virginians hoped for “a return to the denials and injustices of 1950s complacency” (319).

Although Faust’s ballot was a “waste,” she argues it represented something important. A few years before, casting a vote for a Black man in Virginia would have been “unimaginable,” and not long before that, Faust, a woman, would have been unable to cast that vote. Faust was “[t]he embodiment of one dimension of progress, intent on helping to overturn other forms of injustice and inequality” (319).

She recounts Martin Luther King, Jr.’s closing words at Groton when she was a student at Concord: “Lord we ain’t what we want to be; we ain’t what we ought to be; we ain’t what we gonna be. But thank God, we ain’t what we was” (319). 40 years after Faust cast her ballot for Gregory, President Barack Obama would win Virginia’s electoral votes.

Chapter 10-Epilogue Analysis

The final chapters of Necessary Trouble describe Faust’s college experience and her involvement in the antiwar movement and the Sexual Revolution of the 1960s, providing further insights into The Intersection of Class, Race, Gender, and Privilege.

Like Concord Academy, Faust describes Bryn Mawr as progressive in its rigorous treatment of women’s intellects. Nevertheless, it still upheld various repressive gendered expectations and didn’t directly address the systemic disadvantages that women faced, making it challenging to identify and change these social structures. Since the college never addressed contradictory messages regarding opportunities for women and cultural beliefs of female inferiority, it often left its students “ill-equipped to deal with the barriers that would confront [them] as women beyond the college walls” (249).

However, the four years of Faust’s college career saw extraordinary changes, often led by Faust herself, that brought greater equality to female students. Throughout her college years, Faust describes how she made “necessary trouble,” sacrificing her term paper to march in Selma, advocating on behalf of relaxed dress codes and curfew requirements, and shocking her classmates by displaying graphic images of injured Vietnamese children on classroom cork boards.

After her summer in the South, Faust was torn about being an academic when there was so much pressing work to be done. Studying seemed “irrelevant” after all the hands-on work she had done over the summer. However, Faust began to realize that education itself can be a vehicle for change, thereby recognizing The Important Role of Education. Education facilitates social awareness and change; therefore, universities naturally become hubs for social change and inquiry. One example of this was “teach-ins,” in which students and professors “[mobilized] [their] intellectual resources in support of [their] politics” (272) to sponsor lectures on the history of Vietnam and US involvement. They then presented their findings as a petition to Congress, illustrating the practical application of research and learning.

Nevertheless, Faust graduated from Bryn Mawr, unsure that further education could “provide sufficient relevance to the social and political questions that consumed [her]” (306). As the 1960s came to a close and youth culture became “increasingly embittered and alienated” (298), universities, like many other established institutions, faced “a crisis of legitimacy” (304), leading to increasingly violent student protests.

Chapter 12 closes with the continued chaos of 1968 that followed Faust’s graduation, including Robert F. Kennedy’s assassination, the continued escalation of the Vietnam War, and the absence of an antiwar candidate in the 1968 presidential election. All of these major events reflect The Impact of Historical Events on Personal Development. Despite these crises, Faust closes the Epilogue on a more hopeful note, reflecting on how far society has come but how far it still has to go. While she was discouraged with the choices in the 1968 presidential election and chose to “waste” her vote on a write-in candidate, she was able to cast a ballot for a Black man, something unthinkable just a few years earlier. Not long before that, it would have been inconceivable for a woman to cast a ballot. 40 years later, Faust’s home state of Virginia would cast its electoral votes for Barack Obama, moving from a state of de jure segregation to electing the nation’s first Black president in the span of one lifetime. Faust thus suggests that while work remains to be done, much important progress has also been made.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
blurred text