43 pages • 1 hour read
Jean-Paul SartreA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
In his famous lecture “Existentialism Is a Humanism,” Sartre defines existentialism:
What do we mean by saying that existence precedes essence? We mean that man first of all exists, encounters himself, surges up in the world—and defines himself afterwards. If man as the existentialist sees him is not definable, it is because to begin with he is nothing. He will not be anything until later, and then he will be what he makes of himself. Thus, there is no human nature, because there is no God to have a conception of it. Man simply is. Not that he is simply what he conceives himself to be, but he is what he wills, and as he conceives himself after already existing—as he wills to be after that leap towards existence. Man is nothing else but that which he makes of himself (Sartre, Jean-Paul. Existentialism Is a Humanism, translated by Carol Macomber, Yale University Press, 2007).
This is Sartre’s “first principle” of existentialism. For the existentialist, creatures and objects simply exist. Deciding that we, collectively, are humans is an essence that we place on our existence afterward. We are each subjective creatures that exist in the world individually first and as a collective group of humans second. For Sartre, the idea of a “human nature” is a wholly fictitious essence that restrains the radical freedom of our existence. Most of the time, we assume that essence is part of existence: Each of us carries around the essence of human nature, or each bird has the essence of bird-hood.
Nausea is a novel that explores Antoine’s experience of radical contingency—in the words of the essay above, the idea that “man simply is” or “to begin with he is nothing.” Sartre was heavily influenced by phenomenology and devoted much of the novel to phenomenological description of experience under the sign, or in the mood, of nausea—the famous passage about the tree roots in the park is the classic example. Antoine’s nausea recognizes that the relationship between essence and existence is the opposite of the traditional account: Sheer existence comes first, and essence comes afterward.
An important manifestation of this disconnect is in Antoine’s distrust in words that establish the meanings of things. Antoine believes that the color black, circles, and tree roots don’t truly exist (129). Things we call circles exist in the world, and things that are tree roots also exist, but the concepts and names do not exist: Sartre argues that the concept that links all things together called “circles” is a fiction of essence that intrudes on the existence of unrelated objects, and the same applies to tree roots or the color black. When Antoine realizes this, the categorization of objects stops working: He can no longer locate higher-level concepts in the objects he observes in the world (129). Each object is its own existence, free of any categorization or meaning. Antoine’s nausea is an anxiety over the relationship between meaning and the existence of objects and creatures.
In “Existentialism Is a Humanism,” Sartre calls existentialism the only “optimistic” theory that gives humans “dignity.” This dignity and optimism contradict Antoine’s experience, full of repulsive imagery and an inability to relate to other human beings. Antoine’s stumbling into nausea allows Sartre to explore the ramifications of developing into an authentic person. Antoine’s first contact with the nature of things is terrifying and isolating, segregating him from the rest of Bouville because he cannot relate to anybody else’s experiences any longer. Antoine struggles to accept responsibility for creating meaning in a meaningless world. The struggle is terrifying and isolating. Nausea is Sartre’s attempt to portray what it means to exist and to encounter the world before one has attained the optimism and dignity that Sartre asserts in “Existentialism Is a Humanism” is the outcome.
Antoine is an exceedingly lonely character. He rarely interacts with other characters. Beyond Anny and the Self-Taught Man, his interactions with other people are brief and mechanical. Antoine spends more time observing people from afar and recording their habits than he does interacting with them. Before coming to Bouville, Antoine had several friends he travelled the world with, including Anny. Antoine’s loneliness begins with his quest to understand the Marquis de Rollebon. Antoine’s loneliness is exacerbated to an extreme by his nausea and existential awakening.
Antoine is a relatively rich man: He lives off of savings for several years while researching Rollebon. Antoine does not need to work, nor does he have familial or social obligations: He is free to spend every single day however he pleases. Antoine’s freedom is paradoxically compared to death and purposelessness. Antoine writes: “I am alone in this white, garden-rimmed street. Alone and free. But this freedom is rather like death” (157). The juxtaposition of freedom against death suggests that connections to other people give meaning and life to existence. Antoine repeatedly disparages other people for living these connected lives. When dining with the Self-Taught Man, his nausea strikes: “I glance around the room and a violent disgust floods me. What am I doing here? […] Why are these people here? Why are they eating? It’s true they don’t know they exist” (122). Antoine sees people living within their roles (waitress, boyfriend, girlfriend, etc.) as people who are unaware of existence. Antoine views the playing of roles in society as proof that a person is not conscious of their existence. Antoine reasons that if others were truly aware of the implications of their existence, they would know they could do anything with their radical freedom instead of complacently fulfilling pre-determined roles.
Other people have a fundamental connection to others and society that Antoine does not have. Antoine’s growing understanding about the reality of existence and essence isolates him from other people: He copes with this by asserting that other people aren’t really conscious like he is. Antoine cannot prove this assertion. The assertion functions as a circular justification for his loneliness. Antoine’s loneliness is a self-reinforcing product of his views on other people that further exacerbates his questioning of reality. While dining with the Self-Taught Man, he thinks: “I want to leave, go to some place where I will be really in my own niche, where I will fit in…But my place is nowhere; I am unwanted […]” (122). Sartre’s portrayal of Antoine’s disdain for others’ “unconsciousness” and jealousy of their social belonging suggests there is a difficult paradox at the heart of existentialism. Antoine’s loneliness shows a desire for existence and autonomy, yet a desire for collective essence: the roles and cultural bonds humans collectively decide on that structure and give meaning to our lives. The desire for essence and belonging directly conflicts with the existentialist’s understanding of the primacy of existence.
If the loneliness of freedom allows Sartre to explore the consequences of existentialism in social belonging, the presence of history and memory allows Sartre to explore existentialism temporally across a person’s life. When Antoine decides he is done writing about Rollebon, it is because he realizes that there is no continuous connection to the past. While writing, Antoine remarks: “I had thought out this sentence, at first it had been a small part of myself. Now it was inscribed on paper […] I didn’t recognize it any more. I couldn’t conceive it again. […] I wasn’t sure I wrote it” (95). Antoine notes that “the past did not exist” and the persona of Rollebon disappears from his mind entirely (96). Antoine believes that existence in the immediate here and now is all that really exists: Everything pertaining to the past and future is a matter of essence. Sartre presents Antoine as a character who is temporally isolated as well as socially. Antoine stops writing about Rollebon because he believes his idea of Rollebon is entirely a work of fiction. In existentialist terms, Antoine’s history of Rollebon is a work of essence that ascribes meaning to a past existence, where there is no meaning inherent to Rollebon’s existence.
Human memory fades with time, and Antoine can no longer recall the specific details of his past adventures with Anny and his friends. When recalling his adventures in Meknes (a city in Morocco) with Anny, Antoine says that his memories are “coins in the devil’s purse,” a trick of the mind that confuses “dead leaves” for valuable coins (32). Antoine feels he may be “inventing all this” to give a narrative structure to his memories that have led to this current moment in his life (32). Antoine’s existentialist realizations disconnect him from the past versions of himself as much as they disconnect him from other people.
Antoine’s disconnect from his past self is a natural conclusion to the logic of the existentialist: If the only “real” part of existence is the act of existing, then we can only exist in the present moment. Once that moment passes, it becomes essence, a memory susceptible to change and ideological twisting. This existentialist framework leads Antoine to chalk up his historical research and his memories to simple fiction (32, 97). Antoine’s reunion with Anny is a dramatization of the ideas about history and memory illustrated throughout the novel. Anny functions as a focal point for the thematic exploration of memory because so much of Antoine’s past is structured around her. The existentialist’s disconnect between the past self and the present self leads to dissatisfaction and further disillusionment when Antoine attempts to reconnect with somebody from his past. Sartre suggests that the existentialist is fundamentally disconnected from the past due to the nature of existence.
By Jean-Paul Sartre