24 pages • 48 minutes read
Samuel JohnsonA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
In Johnson’s poem, the city of London symbolizes a loss of morality, religion, virtue, and order. Despite being the capital of England, London is a foreign entity: “the needy villain’s gen’ral home, / The common shore of Paris and of Rome” (Lines 94-95). Johnson intended the word “shore” as a pun on “sewer,” implying that London was home to figurative filth and sewage of these corrupt lands. The reference to Paris and Rome is significant—Johnson worries that London could become “a French metropolis” (Line 98), an insult that combines two threats: foreignness and an uncontrollably large size. A French metropolis is inherently inorganic and alien. Johnson’s poem teems with specific vices associated with London, as well as general dangers posed by any city. Because the city is a place where old connections are lost and new money reigns, it is a space of dislocation and disorder. All institutions except commerce dissolve in a city, which poisons religion, marriage, justice, and patriotism. To the moralist Johnson, such a prospect is against Christian order, a fatal disruption of values embodied by a talkative “female atheist” (Line 18). Johnson believes in traditional ideals for women—virtue and humility—so a freethinking woman, who participates in public life and abandons religion, illustrates the destructive potential of the modern city. Johnson is echoing a popular joke here, as female preachers were often the subject of mockery during his time. Johnson’s dislike of the city also must be placed in context of his recent migration to London. A country-bred gentleman whose family had fallen on hard times, Johnson moved to London in 1737 at the age of 29 in search of a livelihood. In the unfamiliar city, he found a hard life, astronomical rents, and deadening anonymity. The concerns about poverty, high rents, and unfair taxes that recur throughout the poem are thus at least partially autobiographical.
If the city drains and consumes people, the countryside is where they flourish. Thales, the chief character of the satire, plans to go to Wales so he can be his natural, virtuous self, much like uncorrupted Adam in the prelapsarian Garden of Eden. Just as London is associated with foreignness and corruption, the countryside embodies true Englishness and purity. Both the speaker and Thales constantly long for the country, described as a “peaceful vale” (Line 46) full of “Cambrian shade” (Line 261), suggesting the cool, comforting shadows of trees. In this idyllic place, “honesty and sense are no disgrace” (Line 44). The country’s beauty is perfect because it promotes morality, bringing out the best in human beings.
Critics questioned the poem’s neat binary between city and country, calling it overly simplistic. Even Johnson himself, in a later phase of his career, remarked that the portrayals of the country in “London” were too idealized. In his Life of Savage (1744), Johnson jokes that his poet friend had “planned out a Scheme of Life for the Country, of which he had no Knowledge but from Pastorals and Songs.” This comic note is an oblique swipe at the portrayal of the countryside in “London.”
The poem is better understood as a proto-modern work exploring the anxieties produced by a rapidly changing world. In this reading, the countryside is not a literal but a figurative space, safe from the challenges of industrialization and the fall of religious and monarchical systems. The city is the reality, while the country a fantasy for that which has already been lost.
Johnson was a Tory and a royalist, who believed that order was best maintained through an absolute monarchy and an unquestioned Anglican Church. By the time he wrote “London,” England had long broken from this vision—the 17th century witnessed two civil wars, an executed king, and an overthrown monarchy. When the monarchy was restored, it no longer enjoyed complete power, but was constitutionally constrained by Parliament. Additionally, foreign dynasties had supplanted English, Scottish, and Irish ruling houses. King George II was a Hanover of German origin. These facts, combined with governmental corruption, the royal excesses of the day, and the chaos of the city, inform the nostalgia for the past in the poem. Overwhelmed by the reality of life in Whig-dominated London, the speakers yearn for a fictional golden age, when religion, the monarchy, and society aligned with conservative values.
In the poem’s imagination, pre-1600 England was devoid of factionalism. The poem hearkens to figures that ostensibly embody this perfect era: Queen Elizabeth I (1533-1603), who oversaw the famous defeat of the seemingly invincible Spanish Armada (naval fleet); Saint David, the patron saint of Wales; King Edward III (1327-77), who began the Hundred Years’ War against France; and Alfred the Great (871-899), the Wessex king known for uniting disparate fiefdoms into one England. All these figures remind readers of a “the blissful age” (Line 25) when English identity flourished—a nostalgia that erases historical reality (factionalism and warfare thrived during the reins of these other monarchs as well) in favor of an idealized dream. The poem’s yearning for such an age is actually a longing for stability and order, and a system in which people are satisfied with their stations in life and do not seek social mobility. Much like the pastoral landscape should be read as a metaphor for this longing, so should the perfect past.
Gold, wealth, bribes, taxes, excise, and poverty are recurrent motifs through the poem, and reflect the theme of the corrupting power of easy money and materialism. Additionally, they express the poem’s underlying anxiety about the ways money has started to define and even replace birth as a marker of social class. In the poem’s vision of a glorious pastoral past, class, though linked with wealth, was hereditary—associated with lineage and thus virtue. However, in the present and the city, money has created a new class of nouveau riche upstarts, enabling even the most immoral people to swim to the top of the social ladder.
Materialism makes everything into a commodity, and renders the production of wealth the only good. In such a scenario, morals, creativity, intellectual freedom, and honesty are naturally compromised. Since all people want is money, they are ready to sell their bodies, opinions, and even souls. Flattery buys government appointments and bribes, so there is little room left for “surly virtue” (Line 145)—a pointed problem for Johnson, who was a famously cantankerous person. Further, when being wealthy becomes synonymous with being virtuous, poverty becomes a crime. “The poor” (Lines 170, 233) are seen as second-class citizens and treated as expendable, while Orgilio’s garish mansion invites the ghastly celebration of oppressive wealth.
The factotums of the government who benefit from this system “Collect a tax, or farm a lottery” (Line 58), bleeding the public by skimming the proceeds of the government-sponsored lottery. The concern about rising taxes was as pertinent then as it is now. Excise duties were raised in 1732, and yet in 1733, Walpole proposed raising taxes again, a move which met with enormous backlash. The problem of the inequitable distribution of wealth was compounded by partisan politics. The Whigs who dominated the London political scene reserved favors and appointments for their supporters, worsening social and economic inequalities. Correspondingly, the poem despairs of corruption and a hyper-materialistic society. The greatest victims of such a system are those at the bottom of the social and economic ladder, the urban poor living in fear of wealthy hooligans, sudden fires, and rampant crime.
By Samuel Johnson
Books on Justice & Injustice
View Collection
British Literature
View Collection
Challenging Authority
View Collection
European History
View Collection
Grief
View Collection
Nation & Nationalism
View Collection
Order & Chaos
View Collection
Politics & Government
View Collection
Power
View Collection
Satire
View Collection
The Past
View Collection