42 pages • 1 hour read
Dalton TrumboA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
Joe’s mask, which covers the horrible injuries sustained upon his face, is one of the novel’s most important symbols. The mask represents both the extent of Joe’s physical trauma and the desire of the military and medical establishments to hide the truth of what happens to soldiers like Joe.
Joe recognizes the mask as something dehumanizing, in that it obscures what is left of his identity and minimizes the injuries he has suffered. He reflects upon how the mask conceals the truth of his state “so that the nurse in her comings and goings wouldn’t vomit at the sight of her patient” (90). Knowing that the nurse might feel physically ill at the sight of his unmasked face reminds Joe of how disfigured he has become, as well as how invested the authorities are in making his disfigurement hard to see. Joe realizes just how important the mask is as a means of military control when, during his unsuccessful period of tapping, he reflects that no one looking at him would suspect that “beneath the mask [. . .] there lay insanity as naked and cruel and desperate as insanity could be” (188). He defines this insanity as “the desire to beat against living skulls until they were pulp [. . .] the lust for murder that was more beautiful more satisfying than any lust he had known before” (188).
In other words, the results of the “insanity” born of bloodlust and war are visible upon his injured face, which is why the military has a vested interest in keeping Joe as concealed as possible—behind Joe’s mask lies the truth of war. It is for this reason that Joe’s mask must remain permanently upon him. It is also why, regardless of any attempt to prove his sanity or humanity, he can never be let outside to show his true face to the world.
Food and eating are important motifs in Johnny Got His Gun, as they serve as frequent reminders of human connection and help to emphasize the divide between Joe’s pre- and post-war lives.
Joe’s wartime experiences and present state lead to experiences of alimentation that are divorced from normal human and social contexts, rendering the experience of nourishment clinical and even dehumanizing. While in the hospital, Joe recalls a soldier who had the top part of his stomach destroyed. To remedy this, the doctors “took the skin and meat from a dead man and they made a flap over the first guy’s stomach. They could lift the flap like a window and watch him digest his food” (87). In turning the soldier’s injury into a kind of exhibit of digestion, the doctors reduce food and eating to a mere physical process removed from its human context, while also turning the soldier into a scientific curiosity. The feeding tubes Joe and other soldiers have to use in the hospital also emphasize the extensive nature of their injuries: “there were wards where men ate through tubes and would eat through them [for] the rest of their lives” (87). In being deprived of something as simple as the ability to feed themselves, soldiers like Joe are once again faced with permanent transformations that impede their agency.
The clinical and dehumanizing experience of being force-fed through tubes forms a strong contrast to how the novel depicts food and eating elsewhere. For Joe, meals are often emblematic of peacetime and human sociability. Joe cherishes his memories of his mother cooking fresh bread rolls, as they remind him of home and peace: “steaming hot and you put butter inside them and it melted and then you put jam on them” (17). When Joe has reveries of dawn in his hometown, he imagines men waking up and discovering that “their wives had sausages and hot cakes and coffee for them” (143). In these memories and reveries, the food itself is nurturing and meaningful because it is made by a family member or spouse and eaten with loved ones in a social setting. Thus, Joe’s experience of tube-feeding in the hospital is especially impoverished and tragic, as it is a reminder of everything that he has irrevocably lost, both physically and socially.
Airplanes symbolize modernity and the wartime misuses of technology. Joe recalls how, as a child, he once met a pilot named Lincoln Beechy who visited his school. The school superintendent, Mr. Hargraves, declared in a speech that “the invention of the airplane was the greatest step forward man had made in a hundred years” (20) and that it was “ushering in a new era of peace and prosperity and mutual understanding” (21). Mr. Hargraves’ emphasis on “peace and prosperity and mutual understanding” stresses the peaceful potential of the new aerial technology, suggesting that the use of airplanes could bring greater opportunities for cross-cultural dialogue and cooperation between nations.
Joe’s later experiences in the First World War ironically subvert Mr. Hargraves’ vision of aerial technology bringing peace to the world. Instead, the airplane becomes a symbol and tool of war, leading to the bombardment of both military and civilian targets alike. Due to its demonstrated potential for destruction, the airplane is central to Joe’s vision of future wars at the novel’s end: “he had seen the airplanes flying in the sky he had seen the skies of the future filled with them black with them and now he saw the horror beneath” (248). At the novel’s close, the airplane epitomizes the distortion of what might be a beneficial technology for violent and inhumane ends.
The fishing rod Joe borrows from his father during a camping trip is another important symbol in the novel, as it represents the worth of human connection and humility. During a flashback, Joe recalls how the fishing rod was his father’s prized possession. When Joe loses the fishing rod, his father is unable to replace it because his father does not have the money to buy another one like it. However, instead of responding with anger, Joe’s father stoically accepts the loss and devotes his energy to enjoying his time with his son. In recalling this memory, Joe realizes that his father was not the “failure” other people claimed he was simply due to his poverty: instead “he was a good man and an honest man” (110) who provided and cared for his family, and therefore eminently worthy in his own way. In recognizing how his father prized human connections and humble joys over materialism and status, Joe concludes that what society values and what actually matters in life are two very different things.