Jesus and the Disinherited

Thurman draws numerous parallels between ancient Jews and contemporary African Americans. Are there significant differences between these two persecuted populations that Thurman fails to take into account? What are they, and why are they important?

Thurman points out the irony of Christianity’s history as an oppressive force and notes that God and Jesus are often presented as white. Are there exceptions to this rule, and if so, how might they inform Thurman’s arguments?

Thurman discusses the crushing weight of powerful social forces, yet he still argues for love and sincerity. How do Thurman’s moral pronouncements work with or against his conception of free will?

Does Thurman’s book offer anything for readers not involved with Christian faith? How can Jesus and the Disinherited be authentically read in a secular context?

Thurman provides several examples from World War II, which occurred as he was writing the book. What purpose do these examples serve? Does Thurman support or criticize America’s involvement in the war, and how does his philosophy apply to wartime?

Does Thurman’s typological breakdown of fear, deception, hatred, and love make for an effective argument strategy? Are any of Thurman’s categorical assignments particularly insightful or unconvincing?

Martin Luther King, Jr., was heavily influenced by Thurman’s thinking and reportedly studied Jesus and the Disinherited thoroughly. Where in King’s speeches, actions, and leadership do you see Thurman’s theories?

Thurman’s interpretation of Jesus’s message is based on particular passages and parables, particularly the Sermon on the Mount. Are there other parts of the Bible that support or contradict Thurman’s interpretation?