logo

44 pages 1 hour read

Jerome Lawrence, Robert E. Lee

Inherit the Wind

Fiction | Play | Adult | Published in 1955

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Act IIChapter Summaries & Analyses

Act II, Scene 1 Summary

Later that night, the townspeople gather for Reverend Brown’s prayer meeting. Brady speaks to a news reporter from England who asks him his personal opinion of Drummond. Brady bears no animosity toward Drummond, but he must oppose someone who is challenging “the faith of millions” (83). The Mayor, the Reverend, and Mrs. Brady arrive, and Reverend Brown begins the prayer meeting. He leads the townspeople in a prayer about believing the word of God. Brown recounts how God created the world in seven days and how he came to create humans in his image. The crowd praises God, and Brown reminds them that they have a duty to cast sinners out of their midst. He calls on the wrath of God to strike Bert down. 

Rachel interrupts and begs her father not to pray for Bert’s destruction. Reverend Brown swears to call down the same destruction on her, even though she is his daughter. Brady warns Brown not to be overzealous and reminds him of a passage from the Bible: “He that troubleth his own house…shall inherit the wind” (91). He highlights the importance of forgiveness and urges the townspeople to return to their homes. Brady sees Drummond and asks him what happened to their friendship. He and Drummond used to be close, but now Brady feels that Drummond has moved away from him. Drummond replies that movement is relative, and suggests that Brady is the one who moved away from him by standing still.

Act II, Scene 2, Pages 93-101 Summary

Two days later, Bert’s trial is in progress. Brady has called Howard to the witness stand. He prompts Howard to tell the court what Bert taught him in school. Howard paraphrases what Bert taught him of evolution. Brady then asks what Bert said about humans; Howard replies that Bert taught him that humans were “sort of evoluted. From the ‘Old World Monkeys’” (94). In his teaching, Bert did not mention the Bible or God. Brady argues that Howard has been confused by “Godless science” and warns the jury that if Bert is not stopped, children like Howard will grow up with no religion. 

Drummond cross-examines Howard and asks the boy if he thinks there is anything wrong with reading Darwin’s book. Brady objects to this question, but Drummond argues that he is trying to determine whether people have the right to think. The judge insists that Drummond rephrase his question, so Drummond instead asks Howard if learning about evolution hurt him in any way. Howard does not think so. He is not yet sure if he believes everything that Bert taught him. Drummond praises the boy for his uncertainty. Drummond remarks that applying morality to everything a person does is “one of the peculiar imbecilities of our time” (100). The judge dismisses Howard from the stand and calls the next witness.

Act II, Scene 2, Pages 101-113 Summary

Davenport calls Rachel to the witness stand. Brady asks her if Bert attends the same church as she does; she replies that Bert stopped attending church two summers ago after a young boy in their community, Tommy, died unbaptized. Bert interrupts her testimony to reveal that Reverend Brown told Tommy’s parents that Tommy was burning in Hell. Bert believes that religion should comfort people, not distress them. Brady requests to have Bert’s comments stricken from the record; the judge agrees. Brady continues his questioning of Rachel and asks her to tell the court about Bert’s opinion of religion. Rachel is reluctant to answer and the judge reminds her that as she is providing testimony under oath, it is a crime to withhold relevant information. Brady reminds Rachel that she told him that Bert said, “God did not create Man! Man created God!” (105). Rachel insists that that is not what Bert said; he simply told a joke. Brady asks her what Bert told her about marriage, and Rachel becomes so upset that she cannot answer. The judge dismisses her from the witness stand, making it impossible for Drummond to cross-examine her. 

It is Drummond’s turn to call witnesses for the defense, but Brady objects each time he calls a scientist. The Judge upholds Brady’s objections. Drummond is not allowed to call any witnesses who can provide “expert testimony on Charles Darwin’s Origin of Species or Descent of Man” (111). Drummond is momentarily flummoxed, but recovers swiftly and asks if he can call a witness who can provide expert testimony on the Bible. The Judge and Brady agree, and Drummond announces that he wants to call Brady to the witness stand. There is uproar in the courtroom. The judge is confused, but Brady agrees to take the stand.

Act II, Scene 2, Pages 113-135 Summary

Drummond establishes that Brady is an authority on the Bible and has memorized many of its passages, but that he has never read any of Darwin’s works. He questions how Brady can be so sure that what Darwin writes goes against the Bible if he has never read his work. Davenport objects when Drummond starts reading from On the Origin of Species to highlight his point; the judge tells Drummond to keep his questions to the Bible. Drummond asks Brady if he believes that everything in the Bible should be taken literally. Brady does, even when the Bible makes claims that do not make sense. He says that the Bible is enough for him. Drummond argues that scientific advancement is “more of a miracle” than the fables in the Bible (122), and that progress should not be stopped just because people are afraid that it challenges their faith. Brady protests that faith must never be abandoned, to which Drummond retorts that God gave humans the power to think freely. 

Drummond shows Brady a rock that is over 10 million years old. Brady protests that Biblical scholars have determined that the world is only 6,000 years old: It was created by God in seven days in the year 4004 BCE. Drummond asks Brady if those seven days were each 24 hours long; Brady is not sure. Drummond pushes him: Perhaps the first “day” lasted millions of years, since there was no way to measure time before the Sun was created on the second day. Brady reluctantly concedes that this is possible. Davenport objects that Drummond’s questions are irrelevant and illegal, and a shouting match begins between Drummond and Brady. Brady accuses Drummond of wanting to attack the Bible and destroy people’s belief in God. Drummond argues that the Bible is only a book, but Brady says that it is not just a book. It is a recording of God’s words to humanity. 

Drummond asks how Brady knows that God did not speak to Darwin when he wrote On the Origin of Species. Brady replies that he knows because God spoke to him directly to tell him to oppose Darwin’s “evil teachings.” Drummond ironically introduces Brady to the jury as a prophet. The audience in the courtroom laughs, which deeply upsets Brady. Drummond continues, asking if being against Brady means being against God. Brady insists that every human is a free agent. Drummond asks why Bert is in jail if every human is a free agent, and continues to mock Brady for implying that he is a prophet. Brady becomes inarticulate and is dismissed from the witness stand as he shouts the names of various books of the Bible. The courtroom is still in an uproar, and the judge adjourns the trial for the day. Mrs. Brady leads her husband away, assuring him that people are not laughing at him.

Act II Analysis

This part of the trial introduces all of the most important arguments in the play. Drummond explores The Value of Critical Thinking with Howard’s testimony. He positions Howard’s uncertainty regarding evolutionary theory as a good thing, not something damaging: Uncertainty means that Howard is thinking critically, not just accepting what he is told. Meanwhile it is revealed that the friendship between Drummond and Brady disintegrated over their respective views of critical thought. Drummond thinks critically, and his thoughts have changed his beliefs and actions. Brady, whose biblical literalism leaves no room for critical thinking, has remained stagnant. He is so adamant in his belief that he will not even admit that certain passages of the Bible cannot be literally true because they are in contravention of the laws of physics. While he holds to his literalism during the trial, there is evidence that even Brady thinks there is room for nuance in religious discussions. He admonishes the Reverend for being very harsh on Rachel. The Bible does exhort Christians to cast out sinners, but it also calls on them to forgive. It is a book that contains some contradictions; Brady is willing to acknowledge those contradictions in certain contexts.

The characters have not yet resolved the issue of Intellectual Freedom and Censorship in Bert’s case. The issue at hand is a little tricky: Drummond is not arguing that Bert didn’t break the law, because he obviously did. He is instead arguing that he broke an unjust law, and that his actions were harmless. Brady, on the other hand, argues that Bert must be censored because his actions did cause real harm to his students. Brady believes that learning about evolution will pull children away from religion, and that growing up without the influence of Christianity is a bad thing. This belief pushes Brady and those who agree with him to engage in real-time censorship in the courtroom. When Bert describes the Reverend’s comments about a child burning in Hell, his remarks are stricken from the record. When Drummond calls scientists as witnesses, Brady successfully objects. When Drummond questions a literal interpretation of the Bible, Davenport calls his remarks “illegal.” His remarks may be incendiary, but it has never been illegal to question Christianity (or any other religious belief) in America. The trial cannot be fair with these limitations.

The Tension Between Science and Religion is sharper than ever. Brady does not believe that science and religion can coexist; he feels that that science is a direct threat to Christianity. That is why he does not want Drummond to call any scientists as witnesses. Today, by contrast, many people feel that it is possible to maintain Christian religious beliefs while also accepting scientific discoveries. Again, Brady conflates religion with morality. He feels that it would be bad for Howard and other children to grow up without Christianity because they would lose their moral compasses. Brady does not want to acknowledge the harm that religious beliefs can cause, but Bert has seen religion exacerbate the pain of grieving parents. He does not see religion as a universal good. Drummond, during his cross-examination of Howard, points out that the boy hasn’t started murdering people since he learned about evolution. 

Brady quotes the Bible at the beginning of this act. The quote is from Proverbs 11:29 and provides inspiration for the title of the play. While interpretations vary, it is generally taken to mean that anyone who troubles their own family or people will invite chaos and destruction. Brady is cautioning the Reverend against taking too aggressive an approach to Christianity, but he does not heed his own advice, which foreshadows his own end in the final act of the play.

When he is interviewing Howard, Brady notes that according to Darwin’s theory, the people in the courtroom “aren’t even descended from good American monkeys!” (95). This is an absurd misrepresentation of both Darwin and history. People are not descended from monkeys; humans and monkeys share a common ancestor. Furthermore the people of Hillsboro are descended from European settlers, not ancestors from the Americas. In fact, all humans share the same ancestors; all modern humans emerged in Africa before spreading around the world.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
blurred text