26 pages • 52 minutes read
Fay WeldonA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
The narrator is the protagonist of the piece; she both tells the story and acts as the main character within the story. The fact that she is unnamed constructs her as an everywoman; it also is a reminder that she is just one of many students to her professor. The fact that the male antagonist is celebrated with a title while she remains unnamed reflects the patriarchal structures that the novel critiques.
In the text, she is characterized primarily through her feelings toward and connection with Peter. It is stressed repeatedly throughout “Ind Aff” that she loves him and cares about his approval. For example, she thinks, “[a]h, but I loved him. I shivered for his disappointment” (Paragraph 4). The word shiver suggests that she embodies his feelings, highlighting the extent to which she has shaped herself around him; it also draws a binary between an objectified woman of the body and a male subject of the mind. The narrator also comes across as deferent to him through their dialogue throughout much of the story. For example, she says nothing to Peter’s complaints of being unable to see Princip’s footprints, even though she disagrees with him, and she gives up her line of inquiry about the start of the war when he’s not paying attention. This kind of relational characterization shows how the romance has reduced her to his mistress instead of an independent subject.
Fay Weldon also notes that the narrator is 25 to Peter’s 46, a sharp contrast that further highlights the Gendered Power Imbalances in Love. Her youth seems to make her rasher than he is, which is seen in the detail of her quickly finishing her salad without having removed the “pips” from the pepper, and in the much more impulsive decision of leaving the relationship at the end of the story.
However, as the story progresses, she gains confidence and, ultimately, independence. The first indication of this is when she asks Peter to stop talking about his wife; she then dares to correct him when he misspeaks. Soon thereafter, she makes the decision to leave Sarajevo and the relationship. By the time she is older and looking back on these events, she concludes that she did have a “first-class mind” and portrays her time with Peter as a youthful mistake. Yet even in emphasizing her liberation from him, she is still defining herself in relation to him, so Weldon implies that her growth is limited, and there is more progress to be made in the name of feminism.
Peter is the narrator’s love interest and the antagonist at the same time. He is seen primarily through the much more cynical lens of the narrator when she is older, not through the young protagonist’s adoring gaze. He is the narrator’s professor and thesis advisor, but unlike her character, his character has a life of his own from the beginning. He is married to a wife he does not love but nevertheless feels obligated to due to their three children. He is described repeatedly as moody, indecisive, and quick to complain.
In contrast to these unflattering details, the text also states: “Peter might be forty-six, but he was six foot two and grizzled and muscled with it, in a dark-eyed, intelligent, broad-jawed kind of way… ‘Muscular academic, not weedy academic’ as my younger sister Clare once said” (Paragraph 21). These details explain part of the narrator’s pull to him: the physical attraction.
He is also characterized by his academic authority, which he constantly flexes to the narrator by lecturing her on Sarajevo’s history and the history of Methodism. He seems to take pleasure in doing so with phrases like “of course,” and he even jumps to correct her when she misstates the number of people who died in World War I. Though she tries to get him back with a correction later on, he doesn’t accept it, signifying an outsized ego.
At the story’s end, the narrator’s view of him has changed and she refers to him by his title, “Professor Piper,” instead of “Peter” a few times, a reminder of the role he should have stayed in all along without becoming familiar as a lover. However, he himself remains a static character; he is “startled” at the narrator’s change of heart, not comprehending what has changed in their relationship.
Mrs. Piper is Peter’s wife and thus the narrator’s competition for the role of Peter’s official partner. The Pipers were married 24 years ago and have three children together, but they have long since fallen out of love. Mrs. Piper thus becomes a foil to the narrator, meant to highlight the narrator’s qualities through the contrast between them. Weldon’s construction of these foils represents the meagre choice of roles that patriarchal creates, leading to competition between women: a wife and mother, or a lover.
Mrs. Piper is a swimming coach, and the narrator repeatedly mentions this in a disdainful tone (with reference to the smell of chlorine). The narrator further portrays Mrs. Piper as “sweaty” and dull to frame herself as comparatively attractive and intellectually curious. Although Peter claims the narrator has “a good mind but not a first-class mind” (Paragraph 4), she is at least “eager and anxious for […] instruction” (Paragraph 6), whereas Mrs. Piper “only likes telly” and once “spat in the face of knowledge,” according to Peter (Paragraph 6). The narrator imagines them as enemy combatants, and Peter’s love is the prize. As far as the narrator is concerned, “I was winning hands down. It didn’t seem like much of a contest at all, in fact” (Paragraph 6). The narrator’s internalized misogyny—she consistently minimizes Mrs. Piper to elevate herself—and trivialization of the affair—viewing it as a contest—emphasizes her immaturity and exposes her superficial confidence, revealing her ample room to grow.
Clare is the narrator’s younger sister and is 23 years old (to the narrator’s 25). This sister character is another foil to the main character. According to the protagonist’s description, Clare is “of the superior human variety kind” (Paragraph 21). As a beautiful redhead who is also smart and “competent,” Clare seems to the narrator to have it all, from graduating from university early to having already found a husband —the narrator notes that “[s]he can even cook” (21). The narrator feels competitive with Clare but thinks that this is a losing battle due to Clare’s near-perfection.
However, the protagonist also manages to find and critique flaws in Clare, namely her husband’s appearance and the city in which they live. For these reasons, she describes Clare as “capable of self-deception” (Paragraph 21). Overall, the narrator paints Clare in a way that reveals her extreme envy of her sister. In this way, the characterization of Clare shows the insecure side of the narrator. Clare is also “surprisingly” encouraging of the narrator’s relationship with Peter, which is important to the narrator given that she must crave the approval of her “superior” sister.
Taken together, the characters of Mrs. Piper and Clare demonstrate that the narrator’s self-image vacillates depending on to whom she is comparing herself. Weldon suggests that her lack of an independent identity is something into which women are socialized and that they view themselves and each other depending on qualities that men might desire. Furthermore, Clare and Mrs. Piper underscore how the narrator is a fluid enough character to give over almost her entire self-image to being Peter’s lover and how competing for male attention (whether it’s direct competition over Peter or competition with her sister over whose partner is better) takes up the majority of her psychological energy.
At the story’s end, when the protagonist notices a waiter in the restaurant similar in age to herself, she feels “[t]he true, the real pain of Ind Aff” (Paragraph 38). The implication is that she is finally directing her feelings appropriately, to someone who is more her age and therefore her equal. However, he is not in all ways her equal; he is a waiter in a developing country and she has money to pay her “own way.” This is a rare moment in the story when Weldon addresses the power imbalance of class as well as gender, as the narrator has the power to project her sexual desires onto him as Peter does to her. The first waiter is described sensually: “young and handsome” with “flashing eyes, hooked nose, luxuriant black hair, sensuous mouth” (Paragraph 38). However, she leaves instead, freeing both characters from sexual objectification.
The second waiter, second to arrive like the wild boar, is older and judges the relationship between the narrator and Peter. This highlights Peter’s age and the indelicacy of the relationship. Thus, in combination, the waiters establish the erotic relationship between Peter and the narrator and confirm its ultimate inappropriateness.