logo

71 pages 2 hours read

Terry Hayes

I Am Pilgrim

Fiction | Novel | Adult | Published in 2013

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Part 2, Chapters 1-7Chapter Summaries & Analyses

Part 2, Chapters 1-7 Summary

Murdoch explains that he will refer to his chief adversary in his greatest case by an alias, the Saracen. The character is referred to by this moniker throughout the work, a practice replicated in this guide. Murdoch explains to the reader: “It means ‘Arab’ or—in a much older use of the word—a Muslim who fought against the Christians. Go back even further and you find that it once meant a nomad. All of these things fitted him perfectly” (71). Murdoch explains that he became one of the world’s few experts on the man’s history and is thus comfortable describing his motives.

The Saracen, Zakaria al-Nassouri, grew up in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, to devout Muslim parents. His father was a zoologist specializing in marine life and a vocal critic of the corruption of the country’s ruling family. He was arrested for this political crime, tortured in prison, and, like many others convicted under the statute, sentenced to death.

The young boy rushes to see his father’s execution but arrives too late. When he asks the dead man’s profession and it matches his father’s, he finally cries out. Murdoch calls this “the primal scream of birth” marking the young man’s path to terrorism, for which Murdoch sardonically says, “Thank you, Saudi Arabia, thank you” (83).

The execution of the family patriarch wrought devastation on the entire family, and they ultimately emigrate to Bahrain. The young boy joins a radical anti-Western mosque. The family’s new source of stress is cultural: The two young girls become drawn to Western culture and dress that is more permissible in Bahrain, arguing with their conservative brother, and his mother tells him she must find employment.

The family drama comes to a head when, during an unexpected school vacation, the young boy sees his mother having lunch with male coworkers, with her face visible rather than veiled. He concocts a plan to enlist in the Soviet-Afghan war, telling his mother he is planning to study Islam in Pakistan. On the morning he departs, he writes a note to his mother explaining his true intentions and disillusionment with her.

The next chapter begins years later, as al-Nassouri has miraculously survived the war and watches the departure of Soviet troops. A notable war leader, Abdul Mohammed Khan, visits al-Nassouri and his remaining comrades to assist in their return home. Khan has a fearsome reputation, as he not only survived capture by the Soviets but also captured the men who betrayed him and buried them alive in concrete he preserves as a wall sculpture. Khan is eager to meet the young Saracen, who is legendary for his wartime accomplishments, and he suggests the young man study with the Taliban. Al-Nassouri demurs, citing his duty to avenge his father and return to Saudi Arabia. As a gesture of faith, Khan provides him with a perfectly forged Lebanese passport, educational credentials, and funds. He considers it “a gift from one warrior whose war had finished to another whose campaign had just begun” (103). Murdoch reflects that this gift makes his later investigation especially challenging.

In the next phase of his life, al-Nassouri moves to Beirut, Lebanon. He attends university and embraces political radicalism, with an emphasis on fundamentalist Islam. His life changes again when he meets a young Palestinian woman who says that freedom from despotism in the Middle East will only happen if one can find a way to destroy the global hegemony of the United States. Struck by her words, al-Nassouri decides that an attack on the United States is his new path to vengeance.

Part 2, Chapters 1-7 Analysis

The novel’s second part introduces its other main character, the as yet unnamed Zakaria al-Nassouri, code name “the Saracen.” He functions as an antagonist for Murdoch, and as his foil, meant to illuminate the contrast—and surprising similarities—between a life of terrorism and a life of espionage. Like Murdoch, al-Nassouri’s life is marked by tragedy—the early death of his father changes him forever. They are both highly intelligent and uniquely skilled: Murdoch survives years as a field agent and the assassination of his mentor, while al-Nassouri distinguishes himself in battle. Both men train in medicine, if only as detours to greater goals, and they rely heavily on the use of aliases and false identities.

Hayes also uses al-Nassouri to explore the ways that The Nature of Heroism and morality depend on context and are shaped by family obligation. The younger man idolizes his father, whose opposition to despotism and deep religious faith are his model for everything. His moral rigidity, Hayes implies, is enhanced by his grief, which explains his embrace of firmly defined gender roles. Where Murdoch is disturbed enough by the tragedies of his work to leave them behind, however briefly, al-Nassouri is unswayed by love of his living family and turns to a life of war. Where Murdoch’s life is shaped by the geopolitics of 9/11, al-Nassouri’s journey follows its own trajectory shaped by the legacies of imperialism and the Cold War.

As he is introduced, al-Nassouri takes on many roles: to his mother he is a beloved, if troubled son, a boy whose pain she understands even if she does not share his ideology. To his fellow fighters, he is a brave hero. For all that his attitudes toward his mother and sister are likely to strike many readers as unsympathetic, Hayes is careful to establish that the greatest responsibility for his radicalization comes from the Saudi government’s despotism.

In Hayes’s account we see al-Nassouri primarily through the eyes of his adversary. The account remains Murdoch’s, even as the internal assumptions and activities described are al-Nassouri’s. The clash between the two remains in the future, but Hayes ensures that the reader is equally curious about the motives and fates of each man. Both lead lives of dangerous unpredictability, and Hayes uses this fundamental similarity to call each one’s moral authority into question.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
blurred text