35 pages • 1 hour read
Richard MathesonA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
Horror novels such as I Am Legend generally construct narrative, character, and symbolic expectations particular to the genre. The horror genre is rooted in Gothic, a literary movement of the Victorian period that typically featured a woman locked in a house, some mystical or spiritual threat, and the absence of male protectors. I Am Legend navigates these genre expectations in a way that centers masculinity rather than innocent femininity.
Robert Neville, a character living in the 1970s but reflective of early 1950s America and its clearly defined gender roles, comments that he doesn’t keep the inside of his house clean as “he was a man and he was alone and these things had no importance to him” (3). Instead of explaining his habit as a symptom of alcoholism or depression, Neville comments that he is a “man” and therefore doesn’t care about a little mess—the implication being that if he were a woman, or if his wife Virginia were still alive, the house would be cleaner. Still, he is essentially locked in a house as a Victorian damsel would, and his lifestyle reflects the gendered expectations of his society.
Neville understands femininity as a means of domestic comfort, emotional support, and sex. Though Neville has his choice of Undead to experiment on, he exclusively chooses women. He questions his actions, but continues to objectify women’s bodies, reflecting the horror genre’s treatment of male protagonists’ love interests as plot devices. During her introduction, Ruth is almost victimized by Neville, who considers how “he might have violated her” (124) had they met years earlier. Ruth’s primary function in the novel is to act as a femme fatale, a plot device who ends Neville’s relatively safe seclusion. Like the character of Lucy in Bram Stoker’s Dracula, Ruth is a seemingly innocent woman whose sexuality is directly linked to the threat of the Undead.
The novel’s gendered confrontations taking place in Neville’s house are significant, as much of Gothic tradition secludes characters—especially women—inside a home that has become horrific or threatening in some way. It is significant that Neville is locked in his home, and his safety is destroyed, when he lets a woman inside his safe haven—as his need to protect her is the reason for his eventual capture and death. The greatest threat to Neville turns out to his gendered expectations of femininity, and how this femininity should interact with his own masculinity.
The spread of the vampiris bacteria is only fully known by Neville following his research on medicine, immunology, and psychology. During the initial contagion and rise of the Undead, the connection between the science of the Undead and their vampiric qualities was largely a mystery. Neville comments that “before science has caught up with the legend, the legend had swallowed science and everything” (17). In I Am Legend, legend functions more powerfully than science, in that it contributed to the human population believing in and mimicking vampires.
Neville’s study of the Undead requires deep knowledge of several scientific disciplines, but it is his study of psychology that bridges the gap between science and legend. The vampire is more a result of mass hysteria than some legendary being come to life. Neville himself had been part of this hysteria, as he brought his daughter, Kathy, to the city’s communal grave upon her death: “Why had he followed so blindly, listening to those fools who set up their stupid regulations during the plague?” (25). Society’s expectations of vampires contribute to the vampiric nature of the Undead itself, more so than any symptom that vampiris causes in its host.
The power of mass persuasion is rooted in the “yellow journalism” that Neville noticed in the early days of vampiris’s spread, which also connects to the theme of Moral Relativism and War. Essentially a result of propaganda, the Undead’s vampiric qualities supersede scientific study because of the number of people willing to believe sensationalist claims.
Neville is the last human on earth at the conclusion of the novel and, moments away from dying by suicide, he realizes his human nature is no longer normal. He will instead become a legend in the infected’s new society—perhaps like that of the vampire, existing beyond the purview of science, in the realm of the inexplicable and unstudied. Legend’s greatest strength is thus its resistance to rational explanation and scientific dissection. The rise of the Undead suggests that the human mind understands unprecedented events through legend, myth, and news retellings rather than science.
At several points throughout I Am Legend, Neville questions the morality of his actions against the Undead. His moral relativism is positioned in accordance with the human society he once knew, including that from his time serving in Panama. In forming a new society, Ruth and the infected create a new moral code that is relative only to their ambitions and conflicts with Neville’s morality.
Neville is cynical of human nature, as revealed in his drunken questioning of whether or not he should kill the Undead: “Really, now, search your soul lovie—is the vampire so bad? All he does is drink blood. Why, then, this unkind prejudice, this thoughtless bias?” (21). He reasons that the worst thing about vampires is that they do not fit into human society (20). For all the harm that humans cause each other, vampires only harm humans to survive. Neville decides to retain his sense of morality relative to his lost society regardless of these revelations, remaining steadfast in his loyalty to what he deems human.
This loyalty causes Ruth and the infected to see Neville to justice for his destruction of some of their number. Their sense of morality is decidedly against the Undead and any remaining humans, like Neville. In order to establish a new society and protect themselves, the infected implement a new morality mirroring Neville’s own violence. Neville resents the infected for their violence against the Undead (having developed sympathy for them through his research), and the infected resent Neville for his violence against them.
The novel’s moral relativism reflects two countries at war. Given the historical context of the novel as the early Cold War, Richard Matheson comments on warfare bringing morality into question. Neville represents the existing status quo, the stalwart defender, the heroic last line of defense before change. Ruth and the infected act as the conquering, almost imperial force that demands their new society and its moral system be honored at all costs. However, at the core of this theme is Matheson’s argument that moral relativism on either side of a conflict is reinforced by the violence they enact, human or not.