26 pages • 52 minutes read
E. B. WhiteA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
White is attuned to the changes wrought by time and the way these changes are visible and invisible. He notes that “to a New Yorker the city is both changeless and changing” (48), seemingly a contradiction. Though the city looks different, White says, it “carries on its lapel the unexpungable odor of the long past, so that no matter where you are in New York you feel the vibrations of great times and tall deeds, of queer people and undertakings” (19-20). In other words, history is present within the contemporary landscape.
White describes the ways that change occurs in the city, noting that “New York never quite catches up with itself, is never in equilibrium” (51). This unbalanced quality is related to the economic booms and busts that the city undergoes, resulting in people moving into and out of the city as jobs and opportunities become more and less available and affordable. White writes that he has personally witnessed the physical changes wrought by these economic conditions, including money being invested in building projects that change the city’s skyline and create new places for living and working.
White also elucidates the cultural and social changes that he has observed. He argues that physical changes both reflect and influence shifts in human behavior. Though some of the differences he writes of may seem insignificant, White suggests that their accumulation greatly alters the experience of living and working in New York City, so that “it neither looks nor feels the way it did twenty-five years ago” (48). These changes range from the decline in the number of newspapers to the tendency of police officers to ride in cars rather than walk around the city. White proposes that changes in technology have impacted the city’s cultural bearing: “Men go to saloons to gaze at televised events instead of to think long thoughts. It is all very disconcerting” (50). In reflecting on how the passage of time has altered the city, White argues that change is in fact an elementary and necessary quality of New York City.
In “Here Is New York,” White interrogates the relationship between urban areas and natural ecosystems. White envisions New York as a living organism that adapts and evolves with the times. Specifically, he is interested in how the growth of the city mirrors the life cycle of natural organisms, as well as how the natural world continues to thrive despite the constant expansion of man-made structures.
White often uses figurative language that compares New York City to a natural organism and ecosystem. For example, he writes: “In flush times the population mushrooms and the new dwellings sprout from the rock. Come bad times and the population scattered and the lofts are abandoned and the landlord withers and dies” (51). In this instance, White’s language directly alludes to the natural world: “mushrooms,” “sprout from the rock,” and “withers” could all refer to the growth of plants.
White also describes the actual flora of the city and how it is connected to the built landscape. He writes: “Forty-seventh Street will be widened (and if my guess is any good, trucks will appear late at night to plant tall trees surreptitiously, their roots to mingle with the intestines of the town)” (55). In this instance, White uses imagery to explain how trees become entwined with the underground elements of the city. The word “intestines” implies that New York City is itself a living organism, a suggestion White introduces earlier in the text when he writes that commuters have “never listened to Manhattan’s breathing” (27).
In his description of New York City’s neighborhoods, White often refers to how the natural world is part of even the most cramped urban, human-dominated environments. For example, he writes: “In the candid light from unshaded bulbs gleam watermelons and lingerie” (45). He also writes of the “nightly garden party of the Lower East Side” (45), which includes “the smell of warm flesh and squashed fruit and fly-bitten flush in the gutter, and cooking” (45). In these descriptions, fruit and plants are just as much a part of the city’s landscape as humans.
White concludes “Here Is New York” by extending the metaphor of the city as a living ecosystem. He writes of a tree which “symbolizes the city: life under difficulties, growth against odds, sap-rise in the midst of concrete, and the steady reaching for the sun” (56). This final image is closely connected to the theme of Vulnerability, as White writes how fervently he hopes the tree will continue to survive, the same hope he holds for the city.
White illustrates the many ways that living in a city make urban dwellers the possible target of violence. Specifically, White writes of the extreme, existential threat of terrorism. White notes that New York City is unique among cities as a place where a “perverted dreamer” might be most likely to plan an attack (54).
In his musings on the vulnerability of New Yorkers, White is focused on the threat of terror by air, noting that the city could be destroyed by planes. Many European cities had recently experienced heavy aerial bombing during World War II. This and the nuclear attacks on Japan seem to weigh heavily on White’s mind as he writes of how news of destruction—“the black headlines of the latest edition” (54)—and the sound of airplanes flying over the city are reminders that New York City could be attacked.
White’s fear at the possibility of an attack on the city is highlighted by his discussion of New York City as the center of the “Parliament of Man” (55): the United Nations, an organizing body of countries which he describes as leading the effort to create a more peaceful world. White describes the duality of the threat of attack and the organization toward peace as “both the universal dilemma and the general solution” (56). This central contradiction—that New York is vulnerable to attack yet also the place where people discuss how “the planes are to be stayed and their errand forestalled” (56)—is one that White suggests defines New York City.
In his musings on New York City, White writes about how the city can cocoon people. In the city, you can choose to be oblivious to external events. As he writes, the city “succeeds in insulating the individual (if he wants it, and almost everybody wants or needs it) against all enormous and violent and wonderful events that are taking place every minute” (22). People can choose to connect with one another. Or they can choose distance.
White illustrates this insulating effect by naming the things that have taken place as he has been writing: a murder, an airplane showcase, ships docking and leaving the port, a visit by the governor, and an accidental death from a piece of masonry falling on someone. Given the size of the city and its geographical density, White writes that “every event is, in a sense, optional, and the inhabitant is in the happy position of being able to choose his spectacle and so conserve his soul” (24). White is not convinced, however, that the disconnection from events is altogether positive, as he first suggests. He wonders if “perhaps it is healthier to live in a community where, when a cornice falls, you feel the blow; where, when the governor passes, you see at any rate his hat” (24).
The possibilities for two opposing forces—connection and isolation, close involvement and distance—to exist simultaneously is one that defines White’s ideas about The Individual and the Community in New York City. Specifically, White notes that New York City offers opportunities for both, depending on a person’s desires, luck, perspective, and disposition.
White expands on this idea—that the individual is entwined in one or more communities, but rarely the city as a whole—by describing the many small neighborhoods that comprise New York City. He notes that “the curious thing about New York is that each large geographical unit is composed of countless small neighborhoods” (35). Many New Yorkers, White claims, tend to stay within their own small neighborhoods, because everything they need is within that area. Therefore, the city as a whole is a compilation of many individual communities, to which individuals might have a greater allegiance. To illustrate this, White writes that a New Yorker who leaves his neighborhood could walk just two blocks and enter “a strange land,” where he “will feel uneasy until he gets back” (36). This connects to White’s earlier argument that the city protects each person from experiencing everything happening in the city. Each person belongs to a small community; therefore their life is defined, for the most part, by more local events.
By E. B. White