56 pages • 1 hour read
Anne MichaelsA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
Seventy-two years earlier, a woman mourns her dead husband, Eugène, and recalls that he once brought her an armful of wildflowers on a beautiful spring day, just hours before his sudden death. She says that she has since become fluent in the “language of the dead” (190) and now sees and hears “signs” from him: “a flicker of light between the trees, […] a bird sitting for long minutes on a branch beside me, unafraid” (190).
She goes on to reminisce about their first meeting, which occurred at a dinner party in 1903 at the home of the physicist Paul Langevin; this gathering was meant to celebrate the fact that the scientist Marie Curie had achieved her doctorate.
Hearing the Curies discuss both spiritualism and their experiments with radioactivity, the speaker wondered if the dead, in their abstract “domain,” might retain some glimmer of “desire” for their lost corporeal senses, just as pitchblende ore hides luminous radium. During an argument about the famed spiritualist Madame Palladino, whose séances had been carefully monitored by Pierre Curie and others with scientific devices to descry any fraud, Pierre called for an open mind, opining that “science must never disclose what it does not understand” (191). The speaker, who has identified herself as a mathematician, could not decide whether to believe in Palladino or not, and she decided that the “truth” may be unreachable, for if observation itself changes the nature of what people observe, how can anything be verified for certain? Just as she had this thought, she sensed Eugène watching her, and her whole world seemed to change to a radiant new place where Eugène would always be with her, always alive and longing. The two of them left the party together, rapturously sharing the details of their lives. Like the Curies, Eugène was Polish and a scientist. The speaker felt that she would never again have to go home alone.
Now, returning to the present, the speaker thinks tenderly of her and Eugène’s children—the half-brothers Marcus and Sandor—both of whom are still coping with their father’s early death.
Four years later, on a beach on the southern coast of England, the physicist and suffragist Hertha Ayrton sits with her friend Marie Curie, who has been emotionally devastated by a scandal in France. Six years have passed since the death of Pierre Curie, and Marie’s recent affair with her married colleague Paul Langevin has shocked the nation, causing her adoptive country of France to virtually disown her despite her two Nobel Prizes. The “mob,” including members of the French press and scientific community, have tried to tarnish every aspect of her character; they have falsely accused her of stealing credit for her late husband’s discoveries and have insinuated the “racial malignancy” of a rumored Jewish heritage. Langevin has tried to defend Marie’s honor by fighting duels, to little avail. Now Marie has fled to England under cover of her Polish name, Maria Sklodowska, seeking the solace and protection of her good friend Hertha.
One evening, they visit a pharmacy for some medicine to help Marie sleep and are startled to find that the pharmacist, a young man named Marcus, is French. However, their fears that he will censure or expose them vanish when he regards them with solicitous kindness and even gives Marie some herbal teas at no charge. Strolling on the seashore before retiring for the night, Hertha reassures Marie that her romance with Langevin will not damage her legacy, saying, “You’ll see, […] young women will know you’re wonderful, they’ll understand—precisely—why we must insist on love. […] Even Pierre” (203). Hertha has devoted her life to protecting and consoling girls and women, and she tries to mitigate Marie’s fears that she has lost her “last chance” for love, prevailing upon her not to hobble herself with the old “bargain” that men have always tried to force on ambitious women in order to make them give up their pursuit of pleasure and freedom.
Looking at the stars, Hertha tries not to think of clocks, which have broken up the music of the spheres into minutes and hours to regulate industry in the new machine-driven age. She tells herself that “science can never determine if something is beyond flesh and bone because that inquiry is inadmissible” (205). Meanwhile, back in the pharmacy, Marcus looks at Marie’s photo in the newspaper. He wishes that he had taken her hand, shared his admiration for her, and told her about his late father Eugène, who was also a scientist from Poland.
Helen James wears her late father’s hat, repaired by Peter, whenever she walks in the woods. Sometimes she sings, and often she senses her father’s “quiet presence” walking closely beside her. On these occasions, her father seems to appear by his own volition rather than being summoned by her “longing.” This sort of extrasensory awareness seems perfectly natural to her, like “knowing it has snowed overnight by the change of light in the bedroom when you wake” (211). She thinks of how the “slow evolution of perception” (212) over the millennia gave humans more advanced sensory organs, increasing their knowledge of their surroundings. Full awareness of the spirits of loved ones, she intuits, may be the next step in humanity’s sensory evolution. For now, all she knows is that whenever she comes to a certain turn in the path, she feels her father’s hand in her own.
In this final chapter, the narrative reflects on the complex web of events and synchronicities that have created the vast spread of human history. Epic cataclysms have had their role in this process, as have the vagaries of human desire, but most of this lattice of events will remain an invisible shadow world. As the narrative states, “[S]ometimes history is simply detritus […]. Sometimes […] a continual convergence of stories unfolding too quickly or too gradually to follow; sometimes, too intimate to know” (216).
In 2025 in Finland, Aimo (Paavo and Sofia’s son) sees a former girlfriend enter the café where they first met years before. This young woman is Anna, the daughter of Mara and Alan, and Aimo wonders if she has gone to the café to meet someone or just to sample its “famous cakes.” Peering in, he sees that she still carries the handbag that he bought for her in Amsterdam. When she comes out, he reflexively follows her without quite intending to. Just seeing Anna again is, for him, an unexpected triumph of memory, and he is “afraid he would remember only enough to wish for her and not enough to find her again” (218). As the streetlights come on with the dusk, Anna, sensing his presence like something glimpsed at the edge of a wood, turns but does not quite see him. This dynamic mirrors their first encounter, when Aimo forgot his book at the café and Anna noticed and ran after him. After thanking her, he walked on; then, as if guided by the same instinct, they both looked back.
In a narrative moment set in 1908, Michaels introduces another unnamed grieving widow in order to advance a broader analysis of The Challenges of Coping With Loss. Notably, the speaker’s experiences further reinforce the novel’s recurring imagery of ghosts, for she sees “signs” from her late husband, Eugène, who reaches out to her through the natural world, manifesting in a ray of sunlight, a breeze, or a lingering bird. In many ways, her personal recollections seek to reconcile the seeming contradiction between the spiritual and the scientific. Recalling her first meeting with Eugène at a scientists’ party that included Marie and Pierre Curie, she correlates these glimpses of a hidden world within nature to the latest scientific advances, such as the discovery of radiation, and her musings resemble John’s when he discovers his “spirit photos.” In this heady new era of discovery, with its ever-deepening insights into the unseen, Pierre Curie himself cautions his colleagues not to discount the possibility of a spirit world. While Eugène’s future wife finds herself divided on this point, believing that spiritual truth may lie beyond the reach of science, her sudden, mutual attraction to Eugène transcends the realm of science, thereby proving to her that the very elusiveness of the spiritual renders it something liminal: both of this world and of another. This attraction, she feels, persists after death, and long after Eugène himself has departed the earth, she can sense his own, unendurable longing—the equal of hers—on the other side of the stubborn divide between “breath and death” (193).
The author’s analysis of liminal spaces and of The Challenges of Coping With Loss continues in the 1912 narrative. Six years after Pierre Curie’s death, Marie Curie crosses a geographical boundary of her own (the English Channel) to escape the dark specter of her husband’s fame, which has brought opprobrium on her from the French press and government due to her recent affair with a colleague. By hiding in England under her maiden name—Maria Sklodowska—she has also symbolically crossed back to her Polish identity, signaling her abdication of the role that the French expected of her: that of a celibate guardian of her late husband’s honor. Refusing to be entombed with him as a sort of national monument, she has committed the sin of continuing to live and to love. As her friend and protector Hertha Ayrton tells her, “We must insist on love” (203), and when she adds that Pierre would understand, her words recall the photographer’s advice to Lia—that the way to “remember someone [is] by living” (157).
The introduction of these seemingly disparate scenes—the experiences of Eugène’s wife and the unjust quasi-exile of Marie Curie—soon prove to be part of the author’s broader efforts to craft a complex conclusion, in which she illustrates the interconnectedness of each new generation. To this end, Michaels introduces yet another synchronicity when Marie and Hertha encounter Marcus, whose French-Polish heritage mirrors the Curies’ marriage; his scientist father, Eugène, knew Pierre, and like him, died relatively young. Acting as a symbolic proxy for Pierre, Marcus not only forgives Marie but inwardly honors her courage. To his lasting regret, however, he fails to tell her of his own sentiments, and that evening, as if sensing this thwarted longing (which may be Pierre’s too), Marie writes tenderly to her late husband in her diary. These symbolically connected moments highlight the characters’ innate understanding of The Value of Faith and the Unseen, for each person engages in an instinctual acknowledgement of the unspoken truths that lie hidden in the fabric of the world.
This theme continues with a momentary glimpse of Helen James’s life almost 100 years later. As Helen wears her late father’s hat, she ruminates on humans’ ever-evolving perception of the unseen world as their sensory organs become more sensitive. Her thoughts combine Lia’s interest in evolution with John’s ideas about scientific advances, and like Paavo, she also believes in the power of song to reach across boundaries. As she muses, “Everything listens when you sing, […] [and] everything sings when you listen” (211). Music, a spirit-like presence that remains unquantifiable by scientific methods, is her constant companion as she strolls the same paths that she used to walk with her father. When she senses the spectral grasp of his hand, her ability to sense his presence stands as a gentle refutation of scientific skepticism and once again punctuates the delicately wandering narrative with the motif of ghosts.
While the majority of the narrative has danced through the delicate connections of the past, the author’s final words venture into the near future—at least from the perspective of contemporary readers. In 2025, Paavo and Sofia’s son, Aimo, strolls wistfully behind his own lost love, who just so happens to be Mara’s daughter Anna. Like the first Anna in 1984, Aimo is now a ghost seeking the living; his intense yearning for this Anna has aided his “memory” enough to allow him to find her again. Like John on the River Escaut, he clings to every detail of her scent, clothes, and body, as if to conjure her out of the ether and compel her to see him again. One of the novel’s many couples who fell in love upon their first meeting, Aimo and Anna now share a glimpse of each other across the vale of death, and this ethereal encounter mirrors their moment of “love at first sight” years ago, when, “pierced with that longing, the belonging that no one can ever explain, they both turned, and looked back” (220). Now, Anna perceives him vaguely in the corner of her eye, just as Peter used to glimpse her grandmother after the woman’s death: like “something moving at the edge of a forest, not quite seen” (219). While this interpretation acknowledges the novel’s constant interplay of ghostly presences, an alternative—and more pragmatic—reading is that Aimo is still alive and has simply lost touch with Anna over the years. By imbuing her complex narrative with a deliberate touch of ambiguity, Michaels blurs the boundaries between living and dead, leaving distinct only the certainty of love.
By Anne Michaels
Art
View Collection
Canadian Literature
View Collection
Family
View Collection
Memorial Day Reads
View Collection
Memory
View Collection
Military Reads
View Collection
Mortality & Death
View Collection
Music
View Collection
The Best of "Best Book" Lists
View Collection
The Booker Prizes Awardees & Honorees
View Collection
The Future
View Collection
The Past
View Collection
War
View Collection