54 pages • 1 hour read
Thomas HarrisA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
As part of his elaborate scheme to kill Hannibal Lecter, Mason Verger breeds a very special, very violent type of pig. Appropriately, pigs are the family business. The father of Mason and Margot was renowned for his talents in the field of pig breeding and slaughter, finding new and innovative ways to make more money from less pigs. He bred them with a prodigal talent, meaning that pigs from around the world could be selected and paired together for more profitable traits, all while paying off corrupt members of Congress to ensure that slaughterhouse laws remained lax. Mason's choice of weapon against Lecter is a tribute to his father. He is symbolically demonstrating the triumph of the Verger family over Lecter and providing a tribute to a father whose actual personality does not seem too important to Mason at all. Rather, the pigs and their association with the family become a sort of joke for Mason. He amuses himself by turning the family business against Lecter, by breeding pigs to eat the man who is famous for eating people, and by bribing politicians such as Krendler to provide him with access to the investigation into Lecter's whereabouts. The entire revenge scheme is a symbolic link between Mason and his family, showing how his father's work in the field of animal slaughter has been corrupted by the decadent, immoral son to become a tool of revenge against one man.
The pigs are also a symbol of the novel's explorations of nature versus nurture, particularly through the lens of inherited traits. In the novel, characters rebel against or succumb to the history of their family. Pazzi's execution is a fitting tribute to his ancestor's execution centuries before, for example, while Starling follows in her father's footsteps of becoming a law enforcement officer. These choices seem predestined, as though Pazzi and Starling are genetically disposed toward these outcomes. Like the pigs, they have been bred over many generations to achieve a certain goal. The pigs, however, represent how this selection process can be guided by more than just chance and random events. Mason deliberately breeds the pigs to be big, strong, and aggressive. Their generations are shorter, allowing for a quicker breeding cycle, allowing Mason to achieve in years what the Pazzi family needed centuries to accomplish in terms of breeding. The pigs symbolize the extent to which negative desires (Mason's lust for revenge) can determine inherited behaviors, overruling the randomness and chance that typically govern human behavior. The pigs are artificial creations, bred to be violent, while the humans are organic products.
The pigs' reaction to Lecter represents the extent to which he seems demonic and inhuman. When Starling helps Lecter break free from the execution, she is shot by a tranquilizer dart. Lecter frees himself and then carries her through the pig pen. The pigs have never hesitated before attacking someone, but, as Lecter approaches with Starling in his arms, the pigs stand down. They back off Lecter, showing restraint and perhaps fear for the first time. The pigs have been bred with exactly one purpose, to kill Lecter, but when confronted with the true Lecter, the pigs submit to him. To them, just like to Tommaso and Romula, Lecter is a supernatural, almost demonic force. Their reaction symbolizes Lecter's inhumanity.
History is a recurring symbol in Hannibal as it provides a context for the violence that takes place. For example, Lecter travels to Florence because he is obsessed with the city’s cultural history. In the previous novel, The Silence of the Lambs, he hung a drawing of Florence’s famous cathedral in his cell. The city is regarded as one of the birthplaces of the Renaissance, a period of artistic and cultural flourishing, which Lecter reveres. He demonstrates his love of this subject when operating under the assumed name Dr. Fell. Despite his status as a foreigner, he secures a job as one of the leading cultural experts in the city. He delivers a lecture about violence, treachery, and betrayal that is very well-received. Lecter's understanding of the city's history functions as an extension of his understanding of violence. For Lecter, violence is not just an act of impulse or necessity. Rather, every act of violence exists in the canon of cultural history to which he is adding. When he murders Rinaldo Pazzi, for example, he does so in a manner that pays tribute to Pazzi's ancestors. Lecter playfully mimics a centuries-old execution to amuse himself and to give some kind of historical validation and intrigue to an otherwise unremarkable murder. There were many ways in which Lecter could have killed Pazzi, but the historical context of the murder symbolizes Lecter's own personal relationship with violence as an art form, with its own history.
In Hannibal, history tends to occur in cycles. As well as the aforementioned Pazzi murder, which is a cyclical recreation of what has come before, other characters engage in historical repetition. Sammi still lingers in his cell, singing the same songs as before even though the hospital has closed down. Starling is forced to reenact the fish market shooting to establish events, passing through the same physical motions, but with the new emotional context of Brigham's death and her impending investigation. The cycles of history serve to trap people in emotional moments. Sammi never had a place to feel at home, so he is caught in a loop of poverty and desperation, performing the same actions in an increasingly desperate manner. Starling is forced to relive a traumatic event as a form of purgatorial torture, with the authorities demanding that she answer for a crime she does not believe that she committed. She buries Brigham as she buried her father, as the embodiment of a paternalistic law enforcement institution in which she has placed her entire faith but which is perpetually letting her down. Sammi and Starling are caught in the same kind of historical loops, in which they are forced to relive the same pain and hope for a better outcome.
Characters' personal histories are also symbolized by the case files kept by the FBI. Despite the complexity and the nuance of a person's private history, their entire life is reduced to the contents of a characterless manilla folder. The dispassionate way in which the FBI and the authorities treat people is illustrated by the prevalence of these folders. History, in the context of the folders, is a series of events such as arrests and interactions with the police, rather than the true depths of a person's character or life. The need to reduce a personal history to the bare minimum represents the dehumanizing effect of the FBI and law enforcement as an institution. There is no time or space in an institution like the FBI to try to truly understand someone. Even though this is the intent of the Behavioral Science Unit, Crawford's team is limited to basement offices, and Crawford himself is pushed toward retirement. The unimportance of personal history and the dehumanizing nature of law enforcement are symbolized by the ubiquity and limitation of the manilla folder.
Starling realizes that Lecter is defined by the careful selection of luxury goods and products that he loves the most, which helps her plan a way to track him. From certain cars to certain foods to certain weapons, Lecter favors only the very best of anything. As such, Starling creates a list of his preferences, especially those that would be hardest to acquire in the United States. The list functions as a character profile of Lecter, trying to build an idea of him through his consumerist choices. Importantly, the decision to compile this list of products demonstrates Starling's separation from the world around her. While no one else has any idea how to track Lecter, Starling does. The existence of a product-orientated profile of Hannibal Lecter is a symbol of Starling's natural intelligence and penchant for innovation. That higher ranking members of the FBI are shocked by her actions just shows how different Starling truly is.
The products themselves are collected together into a profile of Lecter in which his actual personality exists as a black hole in the very center. While Lecter's choice of soap or shoe might not speak to anything other than his preference for the finer things in life, there is a deeper meaning in his choices. The selection of products that Lecter favors represents his detachment from humanity and his devotion to pure, sensual experience. Taste, smell, and touch are all informed by his choice of products, allowing him to comprehend the world through the very finest sensory experiences. Lecter does not relate to other people. He struggles to empathize with anyone who does interest him on an intellectual level. In terms of food and drink, however, he is utterly devoted to anything that will fascinate or amuse him. His complete devotion to these products is a weakness, as it allows him to be tracked, but it is also a fine representation of the extent to which humanity can no longer interest Lecter. Only sensory experiences—rather than human interactions—have the power to titillate the man regarded by many as a monster.
Starling's attempts to compile a list of Lecter's tastes also reflect her developing sympathies. As she becomes increasingly disillusioned with the institutions that surround her, she comes to realize that she understands Lecter better than she understands anything else. She is willing to explore and trust her own tastes, an act of radical self-validation that comforts her far more than any arrest or professional accreditation might achieve. Through her work exploring Lecter's favorite products, Starling foreshadows her eventual decision to run away with him. Through these products, the novel lays a foundation of mutual understanding that eventually blossoms into romance. The products symbolize the slow shift of Starling's interest in Lecter from professional, to personal, to romantic.
By Thomas Harris