logo

47 pages 1 hour read

Gene Luen Yang

Dragon Hoops

Nonfiction | Graphic Memoir | YA | Published in 2020

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Themes

The History and Effects of Racism

Racism is a theme explored in special detail by Gene Yang. Himself an American son of a Taiwanese immigrant, his literary persona, Mr. Yang is mistaken for Alex Zhao’s father by fans at the game, since Alex, an exchange student, is the only Chinese player on the team. Although Yang doesn’t mind, and, in fact, is flattered by the mistake, since Alex plays exceptionally well, small moments like these reveal the extent to which racial stereotypes pervade American life.

Because Yang’s novel, as a narrative nonfiction graphic novel, occupies such a unique generic category, its story arc speaks powerfully to the complicated ways in which racism has developed. Essentially, Yang can tell the story of basketball’s history while also demonstrating the effects of racism in the way in which it is manifest on and off the court in the present day.

As to the book’s first of these two objectives, Yang explains how the famous Globetrotters adopted the “Harlem” moniker to highlight their African American roots. Despite the Globetrotters’ success, African Americans came to prominence within the sport of basketball only in fits and starts. A particularly jarring panel features Yang’s narrative that explains: “At the turn of the twentieth century, many ‘scientists’ proclaimed that blacks simply weren’t as fit for athletics as whites” (113). The corresponding illustration shows four bald, mustached men wearing identical suits and ties, with speech bubbles that read, “They have inferior muscle strength!” “Inferior reasoning power!” “A lack of competitive spirit!” “Small lungs and heavy bones!” (113). Thus, the author makes little attempt to disguise the modern understanding that such prejudice had no basis in science or the ways in which “science” is influenced by cultural attitudes. Nor does Yang—not one to oversimplify complex topics—suggest that racism has disappeared.

In the present day, Yang, who is committed to delivering a heavily self-aware novel, does not shy away from presenting the Black Lives Matter movement as it was manifest in Oakland after the Ferguson decision (88). Simultaneous to this decision, the Dragons are pitted against the predominantly white squad, the De La Salle Spartans. Yang’s authorial decision to narrate the difficulties that African Americans faced in the early days of basketball within the same chapter in which his titular Dragons play the nearly all-white squad suggests that, despite the progress that has been made, America still has far to go in achieving real equality.

Yang uses the theme of racism to illustrate the immigrant experience, to which the phenomenon is closely related. The challenges of assimilation for immigrants are represented primarily through the experiences of Qianjun (“Alex”) Zhao and Jeevin Sandhu. Neither character is a stereotypical basketball player, and each experiences racism. Alex is told to “Go back to Beijing” (323), while Jeevin Sandhu is referred to as “San-douchebag” (and told “F*** you, Indian” (323). Lest Yang the author suggest that Mr. Yang alone is unnerved by these comments, he shows even the players acknowledging that the Castro Valley team is notoriously “the worst” (321). The racist remarks such as “F****** Arab” (278) suffered by Jeevin, a Punjabi student who practices the Sikh faith, are also rooted in false assumptions about his ethnicity. Yang, therefore, makes a special attempt to use his knowledge to educate. His attention to such wide-ranging topics as the history and nature of Sikhism (Chapter 8) and the changing political climate and anti-Western sentiment of Communist China (Chapter 10) produces effective and entertaining attempts to educate his young adult and adult readers alike. Education, Yang suggests, is a way to combat racist tendencies that his work demonstrates persist in the present day. The nuanced and illuminating way in which Yang shows both the history and modern effects of racism while also empowering his readers to fight against it makes Dragon Hoops his most ambitious graphic novel to date.

Emotional Investment in Sports Culture

In perhaps the most ironic first line of a book about basketball, Mr. Yang admits in a forthright speech bubble from a caricature that breaks the fourth wall, “I’ve hated sports ever since I was a little kid […] Especially basketball” (14). Subsequent panels show an already-bespectacled and exceptionally skinny teenage version of Yang unable to catch a pass. The book is suffused with visual images of close-up feet of historical figures such as Croatian immigrant George Mikan, players like Alex Zhao boarding a plane from China, and adults like Coach Lou himself choosing to acknowledge his publicly ostracized mentor, Mike Phelps, as these individuals transcend liminal spaces. In addition to their obvious visual similarity, these images are united by the bold yellow script, “STEP.”

When Mr. Yang takes a step of his own, across the line that divides the Bishop O’Dowd academic center from its gymnasium, it is a step that will both lead to the production of the novel Dragon Hoops and transform Mr. Yang. During the progression of the novel, Mr. Yang makes incrementally more time for the Dragons, including following a Dragons game against the Bishop Gorman Gaels from the bathroom on his phone during a family movie night (Chapter 5) and later missing his wife’s birthday to travel with the team (Chapter 7). By the end of the novel, Yang is fiercely shouting “GO DRAGONS!” (405) during the championship game.

Occasionally, Yang indicates that this adjustment has impacted his time with family. He uses a motif of a pie chart, which in Chapter 1 shows that half of his time is devoted to family, while the other half is split between his comic book writing ventures and his teaching career. When the anxious Mr. Yang excuses himself from his family to sit in the bathroom and check game updates, this same pie chart acknowledges the now expanded “comics” section has impinged on his time with family. Lest this thorough passage into the culture of sports seem to be at odds with his own intentions, Yang represents his family playing basketball together at the book’s conclusion. As such, the novel includes not only a thesis-antithesis progression but also a personal trajectory that has arrived at a synthesis that resolves the two combating pieces represented by the pie chart.

Just before the pleasant image of Mr. Yang playing basketball with his children that concludes the novel, and in the conversation that inaugurates the family game, Mr. Yang admits to his young daughter—to whom he formerly said, “Don’t worry, sweetie. The heroes always win” (147)—that “Basketball doesn’t really [have] good guys or bad guys” (435). When his daughter, with endearing childish naivety, asks, “Then how do we know who wins?” he insists, “We gotta play to find out” (435). Thus, Mr. Yang the family man defends his embrace of athletics and justifies its place in his life. The conviction with which he invites his family into this space represents the synthesis that he and his novel have achieved.

By unabashedly demonstrating his own transformation into a sports fan and next asserting that such an adjustment to his lifestyle has been a positive one, Yang represents sports as a locus wherein people allow their emotions to run high, which he suggests is perfectly acceptable and even healthy.

The Complicated Fight for Gender Equality

Another strongly developed theme in the novel is the history and complexity surrounding the issue of women fighting for their place in athletics. Just as Yang couples stories about legendary Harlem Globetrotter Marques Haynes and the allegations of racism against Mike Phelps with Croatian immigrant George Mikan’s story and that of Punjabi player Jeevin Sandhu, he similarly seamlessly blends historical and present narratives in Chapter 6’s titular brother-sister pair, Oderah and Arinze.

Yang’s historical episode, which features the muted shades of gray and blue that characterizes all his flashback panels, explains how Smith College physical education teacher Senda Berenson—who, as a frail Russian immigrant, seemed to have the odds stacked against her—nevertheless pioneered change at her college by introducing Naismith’s sport. In this journalistic-style comic flashback, Yang depicts the same old, white, bald men to whom he facetiously referred as “‘scientists’” (113) in Chapter 4 claiming that women should not be permitted to steal the ball from each other, run the full length of the basketball court, or dribble more than three times for fear that they avoid intense competition and “scowling faces” that would prevent them from “attract[ing] the most worthy fathers for their children” (174). Yang’s representation of this same group of “scientists” demonstrating sexism as those who propagated racist judgments about African American characters invites the reader to recognize that this homogenous social group espoused the popular consensus during the 19th century. Moreover, Yang’s close juxtaposition of this outmoded majority opinion with the introduction of basketball’s first female to slam dunk, West Virginia University player Georgeann Wells (introduced on page 178), conveys the author’s message that these men’s gender-prejudiced opinion is groundless.

Just as Yang disabuses readers of a possible interpretation that racism has disappeared from basketball, Yang, in his capacity as a nonfiction writer, includes select details to prevent the reader from supposing that sexism and gender discrimination immediately receded from the athletic sphere. For example, Yang notes that, even in the mid-20th century, when Bishop O’Dowd sponsored a women’s team, the women had to play in a “smaller, plainer” facility (185) until 1982. Despite the journalistic integrity of Yang’s reportage, the author brooks no ambiguity with respect to his own opinion. For example, he attributes the O’Dowd women’s team’s state championships in 2012 and 2013 to the change in protocol that saw the men’s and women’s teams’ rotation between gyms, stating that, “the women thrived on this newfound respect” (185).

Although Mr. Yang suspects that Arinze is jealous of his high-achieving sister, who was O’Dowd’s first McDonald’s All American, he admits that competition with his sister forced him to “face bigger challenges” (199). With a similarly enthusiastic and equally unequivocal authorial voice, Yang shows O’Dowd alumnus, former point guard, and Sacramento Mayor Kevin Johnson with a speech bubble that notes that “One school, [with] two championship squads” is “astounding” (429).

Yang the author and his literary persona share a strong conviction that women’s athletics, in addition to being a well-deserved, worthwhile pursuit in its own right, has helped advance the accomplishment of men’s athletics, as evidenced by the success of his deeply admired O’Dowd Dragons 2014-2015 men’s basketball team.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
blurred text