51 pages • 1 hour read
Kiku HughesA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
The protagonist and narrator, Kiku, is a 16-year-old Japanese American girl, based on the author, Kiku Hughes. The novel follows her journey—literal and metaphorical—as she grapples to gain a sense of identity and purpose; in many ways this is a coming-of-age narrative. Through her story, the parallel story of the Japanese American community is told.
At the beginning, Kiku feels little connection to her Japanese heritage. She never felt entirely Japanese, because was she only half-Japanese (her father, who never appears in the story, being white). Neither she, nor her mother and sister, speak Japanese, and they do not take part in Japanese cultural traditions. As she and her mother walk around Japantown in San Francisco, she feels out of place because she cannot read the signs all written in Japanese. She shows little interest or curiosity to learn and her hesitation in influenced by the fear that asking about her family’s past will be upsetting for her mother.
After the displacements begin, she realizes she is more deeply connected to the past than she had thought. She wants to learn more about her grandmother and the rest of her family. She even wants to learn the language, and asks Aiko to teach her Japanese in secret, despite the dangers of speaking Japanese in the camp. She also comes to understand, for the first time, why her family does not speak Japanese anymore; why Ernestina would choose not to teach it to her children after the war. Partly, the Nisei felt they were American, and did not need or want to keep a connection to Japanese culture. Partly, they learned too well the dangers of not assimilating properly and chose to protect their own children from discrimination after the war by abandoning their cultural heritage.
Though Kiku understands this impulse, she has clearly decided to rekindle that connection by the end of the story. She also understands the way the traumas inflicted on a community two generations ago can still impact her life in significant ways. Rather than be limited by that impact, however, she and her mother decide to use that experience as an inspiration to fight for justice in their own time, in the name of other marginalized people who face prejudice and injustice at the hands of the government. By the end of the story, Kiku embodies all three major themes of the story: Generational Trauma and the Power of Memory, Heritage and Immigrant Identity, and Resilience and Resistance.
Kiku’s mother is in many ways like Kiku herself, not only because she reveals that she also traveled back in time as a young woman, but because she also finds a way to resist the trauma of her community and come out of the experience ready to fight for others. It is part of the novel’s message and structure that Kiku and her mother come to recognize their shared experiences and feel a new sense of connectedness. Their intergenerational connection is related to the novel’s resolution of intergenerational healing.
Kiku’s mother is full-Japanese Sansei (third generation) and is the first generation of her family not to learn the Japanese language or participate in her Japanese heritage. She adamantly opposes the “model minority” myth that began in the 1960s and 70s when she was child, showing how racial prejudice has directly impacted on her own formative experience and sense of self.
Unlike Kiku, however, she was never able to speak to her own mother about her time travel experiences, or Ernestina’s experiences in the incarceration camps. It is only with Kiku’s help that she breaks the uncomfortable silence around the topic, so that they can face the past and the future together. Both this long self-imposed silence, and her decision years before to leave New York for Seattle, are evidence of the way the generational trauma had affected her without her awareness. Reawakening her connection to her heritage is part of how she, and Kiku, gain the ability to resist injustice elsewhere.
Ernestina Teranishi, Kiku’s grandmother, is Nisei, born in the US and therefore a citizen, unlike her immigrant parents. She and her parents are sent to Topaz, the Japanese incarceration camp in Utah. She speaks fluent Japanese with her parents, but later does not teach it to her children. She is a brilliant violinist who receives a sponsorship to leave the camps early and attend Juilliard. However, instead of becoming a professional musician, she earns a teaching degree and teaches kindergarten instead. She has three children, and dies young, at the age of 48 years old, from leukemia. Her talent is her and her family’s route out of the camps but is also expressive of a life of deep compromise and trauma.
As the trauma that Kiku describes haunts the Japanese community, Ernestina haunts the story. Throughout the narrative, Ernestina herself never speaks. In every scene where Kiku watches her grandmother, or tries to interact with her, Ernestina is only shown playing the violin, or walking away as Kiku tries to chase her. Just as the experience in the camps robbed Ernestina and her family of the Japanese language, so too does it rob her of any voice at all in the story. Ernestina is an embodiment of the generational trauma that the Japanese American community, and each individual family, faced. She also represents the Japanese heritage and sense of identity that Kiku attempts to find throughout the story, as Kiku literally chases her connection to the past and must come to terms with being only proximate to the Japanese identity as Ernestina experienced it.
Aiko Mifune is a Nisei woman who, as a single woman with no family, is placed in a barracks room with Kiku while they are in Tanforan Assembly Center. In direct contrast to Kiku’s view of Issei and Nisei (like her grandmother) as quiet, contained, and cooperative, Aiko is a foil to Ernestina; Ernestina never speaks on the page, whereas Aiko is “never quiet” (77). She is independent, vocal, rebellious, and never cooperative. Instead, she protests the unjust treatment in the camps at every available opportunity, argues with the white guards who check on them, and calls out those Japanese Americans who work for the administration as stooges and sell-outs. When the questionnaire comes out, she answers no to loyalty questions and is therefore sent to Tule Lake with the other “troublemakers.”
Aiko represents those Japanese American people, especially women, who actively rebelled against their treatment. As Kiku’s mother later says, the media represented the Japanese community as the “model minority” who did not put up a fight or even complain about their unfair treatment during the war. This is still often the story presented in history books, and Kiku herself has been influenced by it. With the defeat of Japan in the World War Two, this messaging was a racist effort to impugn the Japanese identity with slurs of cowardice, passivity, and disempowerment. The character of Aiko stands in direct opposition to this claim, and shows the ways many Japanese Americans fought their incarceration, tried to stand up for themselves and others in the face of prejudice, injustice, and cruelty, and still continue to do so today.
Kiku makes friends with characters around her own age at the camp school, during her time in the past. The most significant of these are May Ide, George Kimura, and Seiji Sato, all of whom help the novel to explore the experience of young people through the generations and help to exemplify certain historical aspects in their interactions with Kiku.
May Ide is an outspoken girl who protests censorship they face in the school, as they cannot talk about the executive order that placed them in the camps. May and Kiku attend dances together, dancing, and kiss in one scene. Though sexuality is not a major theme or subject of the graphic novel, the addition of May and Kiku’s relationship opens the conversation about LGBTQ+ representation, a topic often erased in explorations of the past.
George and Seiji represent two sides of the debate about Japanese American enlistment and the loyalty questionnaire. The debate between these two characters allows the novel to lay out the dilemma which was presented to the Japanese community during that time, and afterwards as the consequences were felt.
The group of teenage characters highlights that Japanese American teenagers incarcerated in camps were in many ways just like any other teenager of the time, or now. They argued with their teachers, and each other, they had fun, played games, and attended school dances, even amid unjust treatment and brutal conditions. In this way, the novel emphasizes their humanity and relatability to the book’s audience.