logo

105 pages 3 hours read

Agatha Christie

Death On The Nile

Fiction | Novel | Adult | Published in 1937

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more. For select classroom titles, we also provide Teaching Guides with discussion and quiz questions to prompt student engagement.

Chapters 14-16Chapter Summaries & Analyses

Chapter 14 Summary

Race reviews what he and Poirot have learned: after Jackie shot Simon, someone took her pistol and, most likely, used it to kill Linnet. That person knew that Jackie would likely be blamed for the crime, but did not know that Miss Bowers would give Jackie morphine and sit with her all night, thus providing her a perfect alibi. Additionally, someone other than Jackie has already tried to kill Linnet with a boulder.

Poirot adds that several people can be eliminated from the list of suspects in the attempt to crush Linnet with a boulder: Simon, Mrs. Allerton, Tim, Miss Van Schuyler, and Miss Bowers.

Race and Poirot interview Jackie. Poirot tells her that he knows she cannot have killed Linnet and asks whether anyone else had a motive. Jackie remarks that Linnet was killed in just the way Jackie had described, so someone really must have been listening in on her conversation with Poirot. Poirot responds: “Yes, it is altogether too much of a coincidence—that Madame Doyle should be killed in just the way you described” (209).

Next, Poirot and Race speak with Simon, who immediately begins to defend Jackie. Poirot asks who else could have wanted to kill Linnet and references Linnet’s remark that she felt unsafe on the Karnak and that everybody hated her. Simon responds that Linnet was upset by a name she saw in the passenger list, someone who held a grudge against her family because of a business deal between Linnet’s father and the other passenger’s father. Evidently the other passenger’s father was financially ruined as a result of the deal. However, Simon does not know which name upset Linnet. Bessner suggests that Ferguson, who clearly holds a grudge against the upper classes, could be the person to question.

Poirot and Race prepare to interview Linnet’s maid, Louise, in the presence of Bessner and Simon. When Poirot learns that Louise has been in Linnet’s service only a month, he asks Simon whether Linnet owned any valuable jewelry. Simon answers that Linnet’s pearls were worth forty or fifty thousand pounds. When Louise arrives, she turns out to be “that same vivacious Latin brunette who Poirot had seen one day and noticed” (215). Today she appears frightened, and at the same time wears a look of cunning. Louise states that she last saw Linnet alive when she came to undress her around 11 p.m. Poirot asks whether Louise heard or saw anything after returning to her own cabin, and she responds that she did not:

‘What could I have seen or heard? I was on the deck below. My cabin, it was on the other side of the boat, even. It is impossible that I should have heard anything. Naturally if I had been unable to sleep, if I had mounted the stairs, then perhaps I might have seen the assassin, this monster, enter or leave Madame’s cabin, but as it is—’ She threw out her hands appealingly to Simon. ‘Monsieur, I implore you—you see how it is? What can I say?’ (216).

Simon responds that nobody thinks Louise heard or saw anything, and that he will look after her. Race asks whether Louise knows of anyone who held a grudge against Linnet; Louise says that Linnet’s former maid, Marie, had wanted to marry one of the engineers on the Karnak, a man called Fleetwood. However, Linnet investigated the man and learned he was already married. Marie stopped seeing Fleetwood, and Fleetwood was enraged with Linnet. According to Louise, Fleetwood told her that he would like to kill Linnet.

Poirot asks whether Louise knows anything about Linnet’s pearls. Louise responds that she saw them on the bedside table the previous night when she put Linnet to bed. Poirot reveals that the pearls were not on the table when he investigated the crime scene in the morning.

Chapter 15 Summary

Race suggests to Poirot that the splash Fanthorp heard could have been the pistol—the murderer might have disposed of it. Poirot finds this “incredible” (220) and thinks it more likely that the murderer will soon plant the pistol in Jackie’s cabin.

Race and Poirot discuss the missing pearls. The thief would have had no opportunity to take them ashore, since there is a watchman who would have seen him or her. Thus, the pearls must still be on board. Poirot speculates that Louise could have been involved in the theft; she has only been with Linnet a short time, and gangs of jewel thieves often work with maids. Poirot hints that he has a theory about the pearls, but that it seems impossible for his theory to be correct.

Race and Poirot agree to question Fleetwood, since he has motive and the “J” scrawled on the wall seems in keeping with his “simple, rather crude nature” (222); however, Poirot doubts that Fleetwood is the culprit because that solution is too simple to be the correct one.

Race asks Poirot who else might be a suspect. Poirot names Pennington, the trustee who might have speculated with Linnet’s money while she was underage. Now, Pennington must hide his actions from Linnet, whose recent marriage puts her in charge of her own finances for the first time and whose keen business mind is likely to notice any discrepancies. Simon’s remark that he never reads anything, but only signs where he is told, might have given Pennington the perfect motive for murder: if Linnet’s fortune passes into the inattentive Simon’s hands, Pennington’s speculation stands a far slimmer chance of being discovered.

Race responds that Poirot has no proof and suggests Ferguson as a suspect. Ferguson is clearly bitter toward the upper classes, and could be the person whose father’s fortune was ruined by Linnet’s father. Race also acknowledges that the known killer on board the Karnak could theoretically be responsible, but adds that it seems unlikely since “their orbits don’t touch” (224).

Fleetwood arrives for questioning and confirms that the story about Linnet’s interference in his intended marriage to Marie is true. He admits to holding a grudge against Linnet but denies having killed her, and states that he was in his bed sleeping at the time of the murder. Poirot and Race decide to ask Fleetwood’s mate to confirm this alibi.

Next, Poirot and Race decide to find out whether anyone on board heard the shot that killed Linnet. Poirot remarks: “I heard nothing—but nothing at all. I might have been drugged, I slept so soundly” (227).

Poirot asks Mrs. Allerton whether she heard anything and whether anyone in her family has suffered a financial loss at Linnet’s father’s hand. Mrs. Allerton reports having heard a splash and someone running, though she is unsure of the precise time she heard them, and says her family’s fortune has only dwindled for mundane reasons. Next, he questions Tim, who responds that he heard “a kind of hullabaloo” (230) and Cornelia calling Fanthorp, then somebody running on the deck and a splash. When asked whether what he heard was a splash or a shot, Tim responds that he did hear something he thought was a cork popping, but that the sound could have been a shot. 

Chapter 16 Summary

Race observes that, because of the location of her cabin, Miss Van Schuyler is likely to have heard something. She is extremely upset about being asked questions. Miss Van Schuyler says that she went to bed a bit later than 10 p.m. As she lay in bed around 1:10 a.m., she heard someone next door in Linnet’s cabin, then someone on the deck, then a splash, which she asserts was made by Rosalie Otterbourne throwing something into the water. According to Miss Van Schuyler, who was out on the deck and saw Rosalie throwing something overboard, Rosalie’s facial expression showed that she was in a heightened emotional state.

At that moment, the boat’s manager enters with a bundle that has been retrieved from the water: something velvet wrapped around a cheap, pink-stained handkerchief and Jackie’s .22 pistol (which Poirot recognizes from the initials engraved into it). Two bullets have been fired from the gun.

Miss Van Schuyler identifies the velvet object as her missing stole, which was used to muffle the sound of the gunshot that killed Linnet. Miss Van Schuyler asserts that she has never met Linnet and their families have had no interactions.

Poirot and Race express puzzlement: the murderer seems to have gone to considerable trouble to implicate Jackie in Linnet’s murder, and yet instead of leaving the pistol—an especially damning piece of evidence—for others to find, they threw it overboard. At the very end of the chapter, Poirot adds (without explanation) that the sequence of events he and Race have pieced together is “impossible. Something is wrong” (239).  

Chapters 14-16 Analysis

Now that the murder has been committed and the prime suspect eliminated, a host of new suspects (most of them red herrings, and some what could be called partial red herrings) emerge. In Chapter Fourteen, we learn two new possible motives for the murder: Linnet’s extremely valuable set of pearls are missing, and could have been stolen by nearly anyone, and, additionally, an engineer on the Karnak by the name of Fleetwood has allegedly told Louise that he would like to kill Linnet as revenge for her interference in his plan to marry her former maid, Marie.

There is also the name on the Karnak’s passenger list that upset Linnet. Initially, Ferguson, who loses no opportunity to castigate members of the upper classes and make rash statements advocating class warfare, seems like a likely suspect, but this will prove to be a red herring. However, Ferguson’s constant tirades do help to underline the class dynamics underlying social interactions on the Karnak. After all, Linnet’s charisma stems in large part from her fabulous wealth and the air of glamour that attends everything she does. Her wealth is also one reason why she is surrounded by resentment, bitterness, and deception. Miss Van Schuyler’s almost cartoonish snobbishness and exclusivity in social matters is what establishes her as an unlikeable character, whereas the more democratically-minded Mrs. Allerton (who is related to someone with a title, but clearly does not think this makes her superior to someone like Rosalie) is presented as an unequivocally positive and likeable one.

Poirot’s interview with Louise Bourget advances two of the subplots. First, her strange response to his inquiry whether she saw or heard anything on the night of the murder, and the fact that she seems to appeal to Simon, provides the reader with an enormous clue to the murderer’s identity and sets in motion the chain of events that leads to her death. Second, it is in the context of his questioning Louise that Poirot reveals that Linnet’s pearls have been stolen. This initiates the investigation into the theft of the pearls, and the solution to that mystery eventually reveals the significance of the subplot involving Tim, Mrs. Allerton, and Joanna Southwood.

Poirot remarks that he slept so soundly on the night of the murder that it was as if he had been drugged; this remark, like the theory he advances about Pennington’s possible motive for killing Linnet, turns out to reflect an actual state of affairs. However, it is unclear from the text whether, at the time he makes the remark, Poirot is already certain that he has been drugged. Christie’s device of characterizing Poirot as one who never speaks his mind completely until he is absolutely sure he is correct is a useful one: it allows her to place important clues in Poirot’s mouth without seeming to have revealed anything significant. Later, when the reader finally sees Poirot’s solution, he understands that the relevant information was available all along, but the odds that the reader will unravel the mystery sooner than Christie intends are slim.

The revelation in Chapter Sixteen that it was Rosalie who threw something overboard, causing the splash heard by Miss Van Schuyler, makes Rosalie into an unlikely suspect in Linnet’s murder. After the sodden gun is retrieved, wrapped in Miss Van Schuyler’s missing stole, the mystery deepens, drawing attention away from the question: what was Miss Van Schuyler doing on deck at night? The canny reader will recall that Miss Bowers is charged with keeping Miss Van Schuyler out of some unspecified trouble. 

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
blurred text