logo

47 pages 1 hour read

Donnie Eichar

Dead Mountain: The Untold True Story of the Dyatlov Pass Incident

Nonfiction | Biography | Adult | Published in 2013

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Chapters 17-22Chapter Summaries & Analyses

Chapter 17 Summary: “2012”

Eichar, Kuntsevich, Borzenkov, and a professional geologist catch a train to start their journey. Eichar tries to imagine the hikers in the train station, but it has been rebuilt since 1959. He wants to take a picture, but his companions stop him without explaining why. As the men eat, Eichar reflects on his trip so far. Meeting Yudin has been revelatory, but others have been less pleased to see him. One reporter accused him of exploiting the Dyatlov mystery for profit, though in reality Eichar has spent a great deal of his own money to finance his expedition. Currently, Eichar believes that an avalanche, while basic, is the most likely explanation for the hikers’ deaths. They likely fled the tent when they heard a frightening rumbling sound, only to get disoriented in the dark and fail to find their way back. Eichar takes a nap as he waits for the train to arrive in Serov.

Chapter 18 Summary: “January 28-February 1, 1959”

After Yudin departs, the hikers set out on the most challenging part of their journey so far. They will spend several days following the Lozva River and then the Auspiya River. The terrain is rough, as the Lozva is not always sufficiently frozen, while its banks are rocky and hard to navigate. The hikers sometimes argue, as everyone is tired and progress is slow. Trees become more sparse on the third day of hiking. The group celebrates Doroshenko’s birthday; he is 21. His gift is a tangerine—a rare treat in the USSR. He shares it with his friends.

On January 31, the weather takes a turn for the worse. Per the team’s journal, they “cover only 1.5 to 2 km in an hour” (234), but they find a cozy place to make camp for the night. On the morning of February 1, they have breakfast, write a mock newspaper about their expedition and the surrounding environment, and build a temporary shelter to store non-essential goods while they make the final trek up Hotlachahl and Otorten. They leave Georgy’s mandolin. Photographs taken that day show the team smiling, but dealing with increasingly adverse weather conditions. When it gets dark around 5pm, the group sets up their tent on the slopes of Hotlachahl. They will not survive the night.

Chapter 19 Summary: “March, 1959”

Investigators examine the cuts in the tent fabric. To their surprise, they discover that the cuts were actually made from the inside. Nobody cut their way into the tent, but the hikers did cut their way out. This means that the hikers, for some reason, felt the need to exit their tent extremely quickly. Forensic examiners confirm that the five hikers found so far all died of hypothermia. Many members of the search party want to wait until spring to keep looking for the other four bodies, but the government overrules them. Yuri Yudin is summoned to Ivdel and asked to identify the belongings that have so far been retrieved from the tent. The process is heartbreaking; he identifies Georgy’s “mandolin with spare strings” and Lyuda’s “gray woolen socks received as a present from Yudin” (247). Igor’s notebook contains a photograph of Zina. Yudin has to share his helicopter ride home with his dead friends’ internal organs, which are undergoing further examination. Government authorities put great pressure on the families to have their children buried in Ivdel. They want to avoid publicity. When the families refuse, officials agree to allow them to bury their children at home, provided the funerals happen in only two days and remain quiet.

Chapter 20 Summary: “2012”

With only 90 minutes to spend in Serov, Eichar and his companions rush to find the school that the Dyatlov group visited. They locate it with some difficulty, and a security guard agrees to give them a brief tour. Nobody else has visited the school in connection with the Dyatlov incident. Before long, a man arrives and asks to see everyone’s papers. He tells them that they have to leave right away. Eichar accidentally left his passport on the train, so he slips away from the man without being seen. The group continues on to Ivdel, arriving near midnight. Ivdel used to be home to many gulags—harsh prison labor camps—and there are still prison work camps nearby. Instead of going to Vizhay and Sector 41, Eichar’s group takes a military van to a small village called Ushma. Concerned about an attack of vertigo, Eichar takes a Valium and sleeps through the journey.

Chapter 21 Summary: “March, 1959”

The first five hikers are buried in Sverdlovsk in the second week of March. Yuri Yudin cannot attend, as he is still working with investigators in Ivdel. Yuri Kuntsevich, then just 12 years old, lives near the cemetery and goes to see what is happening. He believes that he sees undercover KGB agents watching the mourners. Over a thousand people attend the first day of funerals, which are open casket. The only hiker to be buried on the second day of funerals is Georgy, whose resting place is three miles away from the graves of his friends.

Families of the deceased look for explanations. Some people claim that on the night of February 1, they saw strange orbs in the sky near Otorten, bolstering the weapons test theory. Some suggest that the hikers might have left their tent to look at the lights and then been blown down the slope. Others wonder if radiation from the rockets could explain the corpses’ dark brown skin.

Chapter 22 Summary: “2012”

The van arrives in Ushma at 4:30am. Eichar’s group enters the cabin they are meant to be staying in, but inside they find an occupant and his large dog. After a gruff first meeting, all of the men settle down for a few more hours of sleep. When they wake, the man, Oleg, goes outside and rubs himself down with snow. Eichar copies him, which earns him Oleg’s respect. Oleg is on a rustic holiday in Ushma, which is a very beautiful little village. Most people who live in Ushma are Mansi, though Oleg is not. Eichar compares the Mansi people to Indigenous peoples in the Americas, as they have both been harmed by colonialism that has threatened their cultures and languages.

Chapters 17-22 Analysis

Eichar uses the group’s diaries to reconstruct their last few days. It is clear that they maintained their Perseverance and Determination even after Yudin left and their journey became significantly more challenging. The terrain and weather were major difficulties that impacted the mood and harmony of the group. Despite these challenges, they appear to have been in relatively good spirits most of the time, as evidenced by the satirical newspaper that they wrote together. Even once he gets a taste of just how cold a Russian winter can be, Eichar also maintains his determination. He admires the hikers’ ability to continue in the face of extreme weather, and despite his lack of mountaineering experience, he does succeed in following fairly closely in their footsteps. Some of the hardiness of the hikers rubs off on Eichar, as evidenced in his decision to rub himself down with snow as a display of outdoorsy stamina.

These chapters raise more questions about the deaths of the hikers, introducing interpersonal and psychological elements into a discussion that before had focused solely on external phenomena such as weather or military exercises. In such extreme conditions, even a small mistake could prove deadly. If one of their arguments had become too explosive, someone could easily have acted in a way that put everyone in danger, as care and systematic thinking are especially crucial when dealing with the cold. The revelation that the hikers cut their way out of their tent does not explain what killed them, but it does suggest that something made them feel very afraid. Compromising the group’s only shelter during a cold night on a mountain could only be an emergency measure to escape what the hikers perceived to be immediate danger. Given that most of them left the tent without putting on their shoes suggests that they felt that there was absolutely no time to waste, and that they believed that whatever dangers awaited them outside in the cold were less serious than the threat they faced inside the tent.

There is more evidence of Political Repression as the Dyatlov case unfolds. Some people cite the corpses’ skin damage as evidence of weapons testing, further emphasizing their belief that the Soviet government was hiding things from them. While it is true that there was weapons testing in the area, there is no evidence that such tests would have damaged the hikers’ skin, especially if they caused no other damage to the surrounding environment. Additionally, after a month of exposure to the elements, some degree of mummification and skin discoloration on the corpses would have been likely. Regardless, it does seem that officials did want to hide something—possibly simply the fact that they couldn’t account for the deaths of these young people in a satisfactory way, which at that time in the USSR might well have meant demotion or more severe sanction—when they tried to prevent the hikers’ families from holding funerals at home. By deliberately hushing up the deaths instead of celebrating the Dyatlov nine as fallen heroes, the government exacerbated the suspicions of the hikers’ families. 

Eichar finds that some degree of concern about the Russian government seems to be warranted in 2012, more than two decades after the fall of the Soviet Union. His companions prevent him from photographing the train station, but they cannot tell him why photographs are forbidden in the first place; most likely, they are still self-censoring after a lifetime under Soviet rule. At the school in Serov, Eichar appears to have a narrow escape from some kind of police officer or immigration agent—or so Eichar concludes through the language barrier (though readers could easily imagine security guards questioning random men trying to gain access to elementary schools in the US as well). Like so many details of the Dyatlov case, Eichar never gets clear answers on these experiences. His depiction of these encounters ratchets up the tension of his narrative, a useful feature that may prompt him to cast whatever happens in as suspicious a light as possible. Eichar does not question his own lack of preparedness for conducting an investigation in a country despite not speaking the language.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
blurred text