57 pages • 1 hour read
Mick HerronA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
Dead Lions is set in the world of espionage. The link between identity and performance is a foundational part of this world—people adopt false identities and perform these identities while risking their lives. River grows up in the shadow of his grandfather’s reputation. He is told stories about the Cold War, fueling his dream of becoming a spy, only to find himself consigned to the slow horses. When Lamb sends River undercover in Upshott, River performs the identity of a spy exactly as he was taught by his grandfather. He does not just adopt a cover identity; he performs the role of a spy. River has sexual liaisons with locals, breaks into military bases, and reports back to his superiors about his progress, yet he discovers little about what is happening in Upshott. To River, performing this role of spy is almost as important as actually uncovering the secret plot. He is reveling in his first opportunity to express an identity that has been denied to him. Ironically, this performance is exactly why he was lured to Upshott by Katinsky. Katinsky presumed that River would be so preoccupied with performing the identity of the spy that he would not stop to consider whether he was being manipulated. As such, River’s investment in the performance of identity nearly causes his undoing.
The investigation that River undertakes involves a collection of Russian agents who have been deeply integrated into British society for decades. The cicadas, like their insect namesakes, are buried deeply in society with the aim that they will emerge together to wreak havoc. River is looking for an individual or a family: He does not realize that the entire town of Upshott is a collection of Russian agents. This community is, in effect, a performance. The Cicadas are posing as successful English middle-class people, to the extent that even English people do not suspect them. The performance has gone on for so long, however, that the performance has been fully realized as an identity. Katinsky reactivates the sleeper agents and instructs them to blow up Upshott. They ignore him. After two decades of posing as English retirees, they choose their performed identities over their secret identities; the performance has become a reality.
Amid this interplay between performance and identity, Jackson Lamb emerges as a committed performer. Outwardly, Jackson Lamb is an offensive and slovenly person who drives others away. He performs the role of a rude, cynical, and disengaged person, but his mind is working hard at all times. He pretends to not care about his slow horses, but he is protective over his charges. Even his claims that he does not care about the past are belied by his investment in Dickie Bow’s death. He cannot help but care, despite his elaborate performance of disinterest. Lamb, a veteran of dangerous times, has learned to protect himself. The public persona of Jackson Lamb is carefully crafted, a theatrical distraction that allows him to operate in relative secrecy. No one suspects him of being dangerous, nor does anyone consider him a threat: Through performance, he is able to serve his true identity as an investigator.
The romance between Min and Louisa is cut short by Min’s murder. Propelled by grief and rage, Louisa never accepts this ruling. She is determined to get revenge on the men she believes killed Min. Min represented the possibility of a new beginning for Louisa—a future where she could escape the disappointments of her past. His death shatters this, leaving Louisa with a profound sense of loss not only for him but for the dreams he symbolized. Revenge becomes the only way she can exert some control over the chaos and grief that has overwhelmed her life. Though Marcus can stop Louisa from torturing Pashkin, he does not stop her from hurting Kyril. Louisa takes a vindictive pleasure in heightening the dying man’s pain during her brief interrogation. Later, she stops Pashkin’s plot and—though Marcus actually shoots the Russian—she is responsible for stopping the theft. This brutality and this success should satisfy Louisa’s desire for revenge, but she ends the novel in an empty apartment with little hope. The emptiness of her victory underscores the hollow nature of revenge—it is a temporary relief, but it does not fill the void left by the loss of Min. Her revenge becomes an attempt to reclaim control, but it ultimately leaves her feeling just as powerless and isolated.
Like Louisa, Katinsky is driven by revenge. He blames British intelligence for the destruction of his hometown. In the world of espionage, where ideology and deception are par for the course, Katinsky’s quest for revenge is clarifyingly simple and straightforward. He has a clear objective that seems alien to the spies and secret agents around him. Katinsky’s plan is decades in the making, and even as he is dying, he does not give up his desire for revenge. Katinsky orders his Cicada agents to place explosives in Upshott so he can destroy the town, an equal response, he believes, for the destruction of his own town. His sense of justice is rooted in the belief that destruction is the only way to restore balance, yet his plan lacks the satisfaction of true justice—it is rooted in vengeance, not resolution. The agents betray him and, as he sits beside River, Katinsky must contend with his failure. Decades spent plotting revenge, years living undercover in terrible conditions, have come to nothing. Katinsky recognizes the unsatisfactory nature of his revenge and chooses to play his final move, detonating his bomb and dying by suicide. If he cannot have revenge, he accepts, then he will at least have the satisfaction of dictating the nature of his death.
River Cartwright is swept up in Cold War plots that were set in motion long before he was born. While he might struggle to comprehend the relationship between Katinsky and his grandfather, he is not immune to his own desire for revenge. River's vengeance, like Louisa’s, is linked to personal failure. His anger at James Webb for the role he played in River’s demotion fuels his desire to punish Webb. However, River’s sense of justice is clouded by his emotions. In the first novel in the Slough House series, River did nothing to hide his antipathy for James Webb. He blamed Webb for his failure and saw Webb as the reason for his relocation to Slough House. As such, he took pleasure in physically hurting Webb during their final confrontation. River’s desire for revenge in this moment represents his attempt to reassert control over a life he feels has been stolen from him. In Dead Lions, Webb is shot during his failed attempt to recruit Arkady Pashkin. Webb embarrasses himself and his profession, enduring a terrible injury which he manages to survive. At the end of Dead Lions, River checks in on Webb. Any vindicative pleasure he might have found in Webb’s professional failure and physical pain is not as satisfying as he might have thought. Webb has faced his comeuppance, but River cannot abandon his empathy so much that he can revel in Webb’s downfall. River’s response shows the extent to which the novel portrays revenge as inherently unsatisfying. When revenge is realized, either directly or indirectly, then characters such as Louisa and River cannot enjoy the satisfaction they once thought it would bring. When revenge is unrealized, the failure is just as pronounced. This emphasizes the inescapable idea that revenge, whether achieved or thwarted, only deepens the sense of loss and frustration. The quest for failure, the novel suggests, is inherently doomed to fail.
Dead Lions is set in the aftermath of the 7/7 bombings of London, an event that is referenced by the characters as a perceived failure of intelligence networks. The 7/7 bombings, also known as the London bombings, occurred on July 7, 2005, when a series of coordinated terrorist attacks struck London’s public transport system. Four suicide bombers detonated explosives on three London Underground trains and one double-decker bus during the morning rush hour, killing 52 civilians and injuring over 700. The attacks shattered the illusion of invulnerability that once characterized Britain’s intelligence infrastructure, emphasizing how deeply flawed and ill-prepared the system had become. Dead Lions incorporates the shock of this event into the plot, so much so that the characters’ actions are motivated by their desire to avoid another 7/7 or to avert the chaos that a false alarm might entail. The failure of British intelligence, in this regard, is demonstrative of a broader sense of decay in British society. It is a decay not just in systems and processes but in the national psyche itself, where the failure to prevent such an attack becomes emblematic of the breakdown of trust in institutions. Against this backdrop of failure, the depiction of Slough House as a filthy holding pen for MI5 castoffs shows the true extent of the failures of British intelligence: MI5 lacks even the wherewithal to fire their worst agents, let alone prevent another terrorist attack. The Britain depicted in the novel is therefore a Britain gripped by decline.
The decline is so present and pronounced that bad actors can depend on it. Dickie Bow dies on a replacement bus service, for example, which is only put into service because someone sabotaged the railway line. The British rail system is so unreliable, the book suggests, that the unreliability is routine. The replacement bus service becomes part of a plot because everyone in the country expects the trains to break down. This sense of decline is further weaponized by Pashkin’s plot. The looming specter of 7/7 means that Pashkin can weaponize the intelligence’s apparent inadequacy against them. The confused security response to the terrorist threat is factored into his heist, so he chooses to rely on the decay within the security services to personally enrich himself. In Britain, Dead Lions suggests, the only thing that can be relied upon is the confusion and chaos of the declining infrastructure and institutions.
The British public is aware of the decline of their own state. Throughout the novel, the slow horses are acutely aware of the protest that takes place during the novel’s climax. The protest against wealth inequality, they believe, will be very well attended by people from many different backgrounds. They are protesting against the City (the City of London being Britain’s financial hub) and seeking a more egalitarian form of wealth distribution. Someone like Kelly, for example, is prepared to take the drastic action of flying a plane over London to distribute leaflets because she has become deeply invested in the cause. Even though she is from a wealthy middle-class family in a semi-rural village, she recognizes that her country is in decline, and she chooses to act, risking her life and her freedom in the process. The protestors have a righteous anger against the state which is then weaponized by bad actors such as Katinsky and Pashkin, creating a loop of decay in which the institutions of Great Britain are unable to adequately respond to their decline. The very people who are supposed to protect the state and its citizens are themselves discarded, left to decay in an office that mirrors the country’s crumbling confidence in its institutions.
Appearance Versus Reality
View Collection
Books on Justice & Injustice
View Collection
Challenging Authority
View Collection
Fear
View Collection
Good & Evil
View Collection
Hate & Anger
View Collection
Mortality & Death
View Collection
Power
View Collection
Revenge
View Collection
Teams & Gangs
View Collection
The Past
View Collection
War
View Collection