logo

23 pages 46 minutes read

Henry Clay

Compromise of 1850

Nonfiction | Essay / Speech | Adult | Published in 1850

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Literary Devices

Metaphor

In order to guide his listeners into the state of mind that he believes will lead them to vote yes, Clay uses metaphor to create striking imagery of the two alternative outcomes at hand, which he defines as “concord and increased discord” (Paragraph 2). Traditional Christian iconography is especially present, for example, in Clay’s likening the signing of the measure with “the dove of peace […] taking its aerial flight from the dome of the Capitol” (Paragraph 2). In addition, in the same paragraph, Clay uses metaphor to associate personal interests with filth and patriotism with cleanliness: “Let us go to the limpid fountain of unadulterated patriotism, and, performing a solemn lustration, return divested of all selfish, sinister, and sordid impurities” (Paragraph 2). Clay also calls on the South to “go to the altar of our country” (Paragraph 4). His application of metaphor helps build a sense that approving the measure is not only best for the country in a practical sense but also the Christian thing to do; in other words, Clay suggests through metaphor that God is on his side.

Personification

Clay appeals to pathos through the personification of the Union in his speech as a woman, arguably a sacred one. Specifically, in his appeal directly to the South, Clay uses the pronoun “her” four times in the same sentence, creating an image of the country as a woman who needs saving. In this instance, the country is an altar at the same time: “Let us go to the altar of our country and swear […] that we will stand by her; that we will support her; that we will uphold her Constitution; that we will preserve her union” (Paragraph 4). Notably, he seems to open his appeal in this paragraph by referring to “all the South” as a singular “Sir” (Paragraph 4), further suggesting the sense of a Southern Christian gentleman performing chivalry.

Repetition

Repetition plays an important role in Clay’s clarity and ability to establish associations between concepts. Keeping in mind that his words were meant to be delivered orally, parallel structure is also key in the way that Clay frames his content so that his listeners can follow along, absorb, and remember his points. Both aspects are especially clear in his definition of compromise at the start of the speech: “It is a work of mutual concession—an agreement in which there are reciprocal stipulations—a work in which, for the sake of peace and concord, one party abates his extreme demands in consideration of an abatement of extreme demands by the other party: it is a measure of mutual concession—a measure of mutual sacrifice” (Paragraph 1). In this case, the repetition of terms such as “mutual,” “concession,” and “abate” helps to emphasize the features of compromise that Clay most wants to highlight. The parallel structure in the definition, in turn, suggests the very nature of compromise, that is, the give-and-take balance that Clay wants the senators to accept.

Rhetorical Questions

Toward the end of the speech, Clay uses a series of rhetorical questions to drive home The Pressure of Judgment. These questions occur in Clay’s climactic final address to the president. The first concerns the judgment of mankind more broadly, then specifically of those men who view the “scheme of self-government” (Paragraph 6) as a powerful pathway toward human progress. The second shifts concern to “the monarchs of the Old World” (Paragraph 6); these actors, who are eager to “pronounce our glorious republic a disgraceful failure” (Paragraph 6), refer to the “military despotism or foreign domination” (Paragraph 2) that will descend upon the dissolution of the Union. These two rhetorical questions, working together, enforce the extreme contrast throughout the speech. In addition, along with the final rhetorical question, which prompts the listeners to take action, the rhetorical questions create a parallel to the situation: though the outcome of the vote about to take place is technically unknown, much like the questions posed, it should be so obvious as to not need stating.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
blurred text