logo

49 pages 1 hour read

Ross King

Brunelleschi's Dome: How a Renaissance Genius Reinvented Architecture

Nonfiction | Book | Adult | Published in 1999

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Themes

The Fine Line Between History and Legend

Brunelleschi’s Dome narrates the construction of the cupola of the Santa Maria del Fiore cathedral in Florence. The key to understanding this piece of architecture, King suggests, is understanding its creator. As such, the book examines the relationship between the historical construction of the dome and the legend of Brunelleschi which has emerged in the centuries since. The Brunelleschi of legend a is daring and ambitious figure who attempts—and achieves—something which many people believed to be impossible. This sense of wonder and awe can be found in the writings of men like Brunelleschi’s contemporary biographer Antonio Manetti and the painter and architect Giorgio Vasari, who lived a generation after Brunelleschi and painted the fresco on the interior of the dome. As well as being artists in their own right, these men penned important histories of Florence during a time when the city was the epicenter of the philosophical and artistic movement that would become known as the Renaissance. Brunelleschi is key to their portrayal of this time and place, and their accounts often verge on hagiography rather than history. Fittingly for a man buried beside a saint, they talk about Brunelleschi in reverential terms, praising his wondrous works and excluding his numerous mistakes. King compares the contemporary accounts of Brunelleschi’s genius with more realistic, nuanced accounts of his failures, such as the sinking of Il Badalone and the attempted flooding of Lucca. King traces the fine line between history and legend by telling a story that both validates and conflicts with other accounts.

The biographies written by Manetti and Vasari speak to the relationship with the past enjoyed by the people of Renaissance Florence. Before Brunelleschi began work on the dome, the city was emerging as a key player on the European stage. Despite the wealth and political importance of Florence, the city’s past was not particularly notable. King mentions the myths and legends which the Florentines told one another. They believed that their city was founded by Roman emperors, even if they debated which particular emperor was responsible. They sought to align themselves with a glorious past, trying to validate their importance in historical terms. As King notes, many of these stories were simply not true. Many of the buildings which the Florentines believed to be Roman were, in fact, from the early Middle Ages. The Florentines had become invested in their own legend, which replaced actual history. This is why Brunelleschi emerges as such an important figure in the Republic of Florence. Through his dome, the city has a historic achievement. The dome is more than just a physical landmark, it is a signpost of legendary status, giving Florentines a  present-day source of pride that allowed them to divest from legendary, ahistorical beliefs about the past.

The fine line between history and legend is also explored in the quasi-religious ways in which the people of Florence treat their intellectual leaders. Before Brunelleschi begins works on the dome, for example, the model made by Neri di Fioravanti is an important centerpiece of civic life. People make offerings at the model as though it were a church order, only for the model to be turned into a public lavatory once Brunelleschi’s work overtakes Neri’s own. Vasari notes the way in which Brunelleschi is venerated more by the Florentine people after his death than he was in life. In death, he becomes a mythical figure. Through the hagiographies of Vasari and Manetti, Brunelleschi is given the treatment of a saint. His great works are praised and his flaws are ignored. Vasari likens Brunelleschi to Jesus Christ, approaching blasphemy in his desire to praise the man who elevated the discipline of architecture to new heights. Brunelleschi and his dome become almost religious figures. They embody the Renaissance movement, receiving praise from people for ushering a new era in history. Legend and history are folded together through the veneration of Brunelleschi and his work.

Professional Rivalry as a Catalyst for Innovation

Throughout Brunelleschi’s life, professional rivalries serve as a catalyst for change. Competition is a cornerstone of civic life in early Renaissance Florence, with the city’s artists invited to submit competing proposals for many public projects. This is such an important part of the book that the opening chapter begins with the competition for the design of the dome. Importantly, this is the second time that Brunelleschi finds himself up against Lorenzo Ghiberti. In the first competition, Brunelleschi is offered the chance to design the doors for the baptistry alongside Ghiberti. Brunelleschi refuses and decamps to Rome, taking the suggestion that he is Ghiberti’s equal as an insult. Ghiberti is an important figure, almost as venerated as Brunelleschi. Ghiberti’s work revolutionized sculpture nearly to the degree that Brunelleschi revolutionized architecture. In many ways, he is Brunelleschi’s equal, and the competition between the two men spurs both to new heights of achievement. Through their animosity, they inspire one another. Brunelleschi is determined to beat Ghiberti, almost as revenge for the competition for the baptistry doors. He is so driven to finish the dome—and to finish it according to his designs—because he feels a need to triumph over Ghiberti. The importance of their rivalry is immortalized in the physical space of Florence, with Brunelleschi’s dome (his greatest work) facing the baptistry which houses Ghiberti’s own masterpiece (though the bronze panels have since been moved to a nearby museum). Ghiberti and Brunelleschi may hate one another, but this hatred is artistically rewarding.

Though Giovanni da Prato is relatively unknown today, he was nearly as influential in the Italian Renaissance as Brunelleschi and Ghiberti. Though he worked on the cathedral in a significant capacity, he seems best remembered as an antagonist to Brunelleschi. He is much more direct in his criticism of Brunelleschi, warning against the murk and gloom that he claims Brunelleschi’s ideas will bring to the cathedral. Prato represents a Gothic past, an ideological enemy of the sort of future which Brunelleschi has imagined. Their rivalry does not just inspire Brunelleschi’s talents as an architect, however. The men write dueling sonnets, excoriating one another in poetry. Though these poems have been lost to time, they demonstrate the  relationship between rivalry and creativity: Brunelleschi—nominally an engineer and architect—felt so inspired by his rivalry with Giovanni da Prato that branched out into the field of literature. Importantly, Brunelleschi’s victory over Prato is so complete that Prato is remembered only in Brunelleschi’s shadow. He is a footnote in history, notable only as an opponent to Brunelleschi rather than for his own works. This is the irony of Prato’s fate, as presented in the book. In historical terms, Brunelleschi and his design have cast Prato into the same murk and gloom which Prato feared would affect the cathedral.

Brunelleschi also develops a rivalry with his own adopted son. Though he had no children of his own, Brunelleschi adopted Andrea di Lazzaro Cavalcanti, who took the name Il Buggiano, in 1415. He trains Buggiano to follow in his footsteps, though he occasionally forgets to actually pay his own adopted son for his work as an apprentice. This conflict reaches a climax when Buggiano absconds to Naples with a sack of stolen jewels to make up for the two years’ salary which his father has forgotten to pay. The fallout between father and son demonstrates the extent to which Brunelleschi was focused only on his dome. He has no biological children, and his relationship with his adopted son was largely professional, right up until the moment when it was not. There seems to have been no lingering animosity between the two, however, as Buggiano was later made Brunelleschi’s heir. The men were rivals, but friendly. The complicated nature of their rivalry helps to illustrate Brunelleschi’s laser-like focus on his work.

Architecture as a Political Statement

Brunelleschi’s proposed design for the cupola of the Santa Maria del Fiore cathedral is far more than just a set of architectural plans. The design is imbued with a political narrative, informed by centuries of history. Most notably, Brunelleschi plans to build the dome as a demonstration of Florence’s independence. Because Brunelleschi and his municipal sponsors reject the Gothic architecture of Northern Europe and Milan, Brunelleschi must find a way to build the enormous dome without buttresses to support its weight. The dome’s significance as a political message thus imposes restrictions on its physical form, and these restrictions spur architectural innovation. Florence’s architecture will be something new, Brunelleschi proposes, a way to announce the city on the world stage. Florence, as a relative newcomer to European politics, seeks to distinguish itself from rivals while also associating itself with antiquity. Brunelleschi’s design references Roman buildings such as the Pantheon, yet employs such innovative techniques that his work is breathtaking for contemporaries. The dome is a modern and historic design, he suggests, which creates a new kind of Florentine ethos. The dome is not just a physical creation, but an ideological one as well.

Architecture is also presented as something more than just buildings and civic engineering. Brunelleschi, King says, was employed by the city of Florence to build military defenses. His genius was employed in warfare, but not only in a defensive capacity. Ultimately, Brunelleschi’s attempts to use his architectural knowledge as an offensive weapon of war backfire. He not only fails to surround Lucca with a lake, but his dam is destroyed and his own camp is flooded. In spite of this failure, however, Brunelleschi’s military efforts demonstrate that architecture was more than just construction. If war is politics by other means, then Brunelleschi’s military forays are political in nature, even in failure. As much as his dome seeks to define an ideological version of Florence, his military ventures seek to protect Florence from rivals.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
blurred text