logo

49 pages 1 hour read

Ross King

Brunelleschi's Dome: How a Renaissance Genius Reinvented Architecture

Nonfiction | Book | Adult | Published in 1999

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Key Figures

Filippo Brunelleschi

Filippo Brunelleschi is the subject of Brunelleschi’s Dome. While the book charts the process by which the dome was constructed, Brunelleschi emerges as the driving force of this project through sheer personality. Brunelleschi is presented as a prototypical Renaissance figure: one who sifts through the ruins of Rome to drag ancient knowledge into the modern era. Brunelleschi himself is a genius, the book suggests, but he is not without flaws. He is paranoid and secretive, refusing to tell anyone about his plans for the dome for fear that they might steal his ideas. He is bitter and jealous, developing an intense rivalry with figures, like Lorenzo Ghiberti, whom he believes to have wronged him in some fashion. Brunelleschi is arrogant and entitled, resenting anyone who attempts to encroach on his authority to build the dome. As such, the dome itself exists as a physical embodiment of the man who made it. The dome is a mysterious, defiant symbol of a new school of thought, a rebuke to the Gothic ideals of the past, and a celebration of Florentine exceptionalism. The dome is Brunelleschi, just as Brunelleschi is the dome.

King’s depiction of Brunelleschi relies on biographies by figures like the painter and architect Giorgio Vasari (1511-1574) and the mathematician and architect Antonio Manetti (1423-1497). These men were ardent fans of Brunelleschi as well as participants in the Renaissance movement which Brunelleschi helped to inspire. King turns to them for details from Brunelleschi’s life, but makes sure to point out the occasions when either man may be exaggerating the truth about their hero. Manetti’s story about Brunelleschi using an egg to prove the viability of his plans for the dome, for example, is categorized as a “legend” (43) by King, who also notes the way in which both Manetti and Vasari exclude a number of embarrassing failures from Brunelleschi’s story. In this respect, King demonstrates the way in which the myth of Brunelleschi was constructed. Having achieved the impossible by building the dome in Florence, Brunelleschi was turned into a quasi-mythical figure. Renaissance-era accounts present him as a man almost without fault, leaving behind the dome as a testament to his genius.

While King’s depictions of Brunelleschi are not always as relentlessly positive as those of Vasari and Manetti, his descriptions of Brunelleschi’s failures illustrate the extent to which Brunelleschi was willing to learn from his past mistakes. After tying for first place in the competition for the baptistry doors, Brunelleschi is so offended by the thought of sharing the award with his rival, Lorenzo Ghiberti, that he refuses the offer and decamps to Rome. This prideful, passionate outburst suggests a Brunelleschi who is still ruled by emotion. Later, however, Brunelleschi returns to Florence and finds himself competing once again with Ghiberti. Once again, he is made joint winner with his old rival. This time, however, he trusts in his own genius and believes that he will be able to elevate himself above his rival. His is proved correct and is rewarded for his more mature response. After the sinking of the Badalone—another example of Brunelleschi’s hubris catching up with him—he never again tries to transport marble up the Arno. Later in his life, he has no interest in demonstrating his genius in anything other than architecture. On both these occasions, Brunelleschi takes lessons from the failures of his past.

As such, Brunelleschi’s Dome is a story about Brunelleschi as a fallible but great man. In the final passages of the book, King notes his failings as a key part of what makes him and his dome so compelling. Brunelleschi is a human, with flaws like anyone else. His work is evidence of the vast potential of humanity, rather than some mythical achievement which must be turned into hagiography. That the dome was built by a man, King suggests, “only makes it more of a wonder” (167). As such, Brunelleschi’s flaws and his mistakes humanize him. Brunelleschi is such a towering figure because, as King suggests, he was just one man with a vision.

Lorenzo Ghiberti

Lorenzo Ghiberti was an Italian sculptor, goldsmith, and architect, best known for his work on the bronze doors of the Baptistery of Florence Cathedral, which Michelangelo later called the “Gates of Paradise.” Ghiberti was born in Florence and initially trained as a goldsmith under his father, Bartoluccio Ghiberti, who also worked in metals. His career took a significant turn in 1401, when he entered and won a famous competition to create new bronze doors for the Florence Baptistery, a competition that attracted many leading artists of the day. This competition required participants to create a bronze relief depicting the Sacrifice of Isaac. Ghiberti’s design, which showcased his mastery of anatomy, perspective, and emotional expression, triumphed over that of the other renowned competitor, Filippo Brunelleschi. In Brunelleschi’s Dome, this incident becomes a formative moment in the life of Brunelleschi and cements the rivalry between Ghiberti and Brunelleschi which endures throughout the book.

The commission for the Baptistery doors launched Ghiberti’s career and established him as a leading sculptor in Florence. He spent the next two decades, from 1403 to 1424, crafting what became known as the North Doors. This long process mirrors Brunelleschi’s own work on the dome, especially as both men are working in Florence on the construction of the dome. Ghiberti’s success with the North Doors earned him another commission for the East Doors of the Baptistery, which he began in 1425 and completed in 1452. This project, spanning 27 years, produced what are now known as the “Gates of Paradise.” In particular, King suggests that Ghiberti being awarded this commission without any competition may have rankled Brunelleschi, who was always forced to submit proposals against other people (including Ghiberti) whenever a new part of the dome needed construction. Brunelleschi was not just striving to build something spectacular, but he remained in constant competition against rivals like Ghiberti to demonstrate why he and his designs were worthy of veneration.

The two artists remained in competition even as Brunelleschi worked on the dome. Ghiberti was appointed as one of the supervisors of the project, a decision that further intensified their rivalry. However, Brunelleschi’s engineering and vision ultimately drove the project forward, and he retained primary control, effectively sidelining Ghiberti. King shares an anecdote about Brunelleschi feigning sickness as a way to publicly humiliate Ghiberti and sideline Brunelleschi on the project. This marked a turning point in the rivalry, solidifying Brunelleschi’s place as the leading architect in Florence and a pioneer of Renaissance architecture. Though their careers took different paths, the rivalry between Ghiberti and Brunelleschi contributed significantly to the Renaissance, pushing each artist to achieve extraordinary innovations. Ghiberti’s doors became masterpieces of sculpture, famous for their perspective and narrative depth, while Brunelleschi’s dome transformed architectural design and engineering. Their competition symbolized the growing tension in Renaissance Florence between tradition and innovation, with Ghiberti representing the elegance of Gothic artistry and Brunelleschi embodying the bold advances of new architectural and scientific methods. Ultimately, their greatest works could be found in the same piazza, with the baptistry doors adorning the building directly in front of the cathedral, on top of which is Brunelleschi’s dome (though the bronze door panels were later replaced with replicas, with the real version being placed in the museum behind the dome). The rivalry which defined and shaped the lives of the two men ultimately brought them to the same place.

Antonio di Tuccio Manetti

Antonio di Tuccio Manetti was an Italian architect, mathematician, and biographer, known primarily for his contributions to the field of Renaissance architecture and his biography of Filippo Brunelleschi. Born in Florence, Manetti was a central figure in the intellectual and artistic life of the city, living during the peak of the Florentine Renaissance. Manetti was trained in both mathematics and architecture, fields that were becoming increasingly interconnected as Renaissance thinkers sought to apply mathematical principles to art and building design. He worked on several important architectural projects in Florence, including the restoration of the city’s walls and various civic buildings, as well as contributions to the design and construction of the Florence Cathedral (Santa Maria del Fiore), especially in later phases of the dome’s development and interior design.

Beyond his work as an architect, Manetti is celebrated for writing the first biography of Filippo Brunelleschi, though there remains some scholarly uncertainty as to whether he is the author of each of the three surviving manuscripts—the Magliabecchiana, the Pistoiese, and the Corsiniana—that make up the Life of Brunelleschi. Taken together, these three manuscripts offer an account of Brunelleschi’s character, achievements, and innovations, particularly his revolutionary techniques for constructing the cathedral’s dome without traditional scaffolding. This biography not only preserves valuable details about Brunelleschi’s work and personality but also provides insights into the intellectual environment of Florence during the Renaissance. In the context of Brunelleschi’s Dome, Manetti’s work is important because it documents the mythologization of Brunelleschi. The architect of Florence’s dome is celebrated as an almost mythical figure, with Manetti sharing (and occasionally exaggerating) stories from Brunelleschi’s life. He also excludes embarrassing incidents, such as the sinking of Brunelleschi’s boat, Il Badalone. Manetti’s work often approaches the genre of hagiography, turning Brunelleschi into a secular saint of the Renaissance itself rather than a mere architect. Just as Brunelleschi was the chief architect of the dome, Manetti is arguably the chief architect of the myth of Brunelleschi.

Giovanni da Prato

Giovanni da Prato was an Italian poet, writer, and scholar, best known for his work Il Paradiso degli Alberti. In the context of Brunelleschi’s Dome, however, he emerges as a key rival of Filippo Brunelleschi. Like many of Brunelleschi’s peers, Giovanni da Prato was active in many fields. As well as working on the dome, he composed poems and wrote literature. Born in Florence, he was part of the vibrant intellectual and literary environment of 14th-century Italy. Il Paradiso degli Alberti is a collection of stories and dialogues reflecting the humanistic themes of the time, including philosophy, love, and the natural world—a work which has endured far longer than his involvement in the construction of the dome. Giovanni da Prato’s legacy lies largely in his contribution to the development of Italian vernacular literature and his depiction of the intellectual currents of early Renaissance humanism. Although he is not as widely recognized today as some of his contemporaries, his works remain a valuable window into the cultural and intellectual life of Florence during his time. As such, he serves an important narrative purpose in illustrating Brunelleschi rivalries with those around him, demonstrating that even the seemingly unimportant rivals played their own role in history.

Giovanni da Prato was closely connected to the intellectual and artistic circle engaged in the cathedral’s completion. His writings and associations reflect a keen interest in the aesthetic and symbolic importance of the cathedral. He documented some of the discussions and theories around its construction, especially the efforts to create a dome that would be both structurally sound and visually magnificent. He submitted many complaints about Brunelleschi’s designs to the Opera del Duomo, wishing to document his fears that the cathedral would be “murky and gloomy” (90) without windows (which he had designed). In this respect, Giovanni da Prato represents an earlier school of architecture. His desire to bring light into the cathedral through the windows is reminiscent of the Gothic style from which Brunelleschi sought to distance himself. In this way, da Prato and Brunelleschi were not only professional rivals, but ideological opponents. Brunelleschi may have triumphed, particularly in being immortalized through his association with the dome, but Giovanni da Prato was eventually put in charge of the construction project after Brunelleschi’s death. While this may seem like a triumph, he was forced to complete his rival’s project while receiving a mere fraction of the credit.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
blurred text