31 pages • 1 hour read
Chimamanda Ngozi AdichieA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
Gender as Pageantry is the overarching theme of the story. The story calls attention to the role gender expectations play in the narrative as soon as the narrator introduces Chikwado.
The reader learns through exposition that Chikwado’s daily habits include attending religious services dedicated to helping women find a husband. Initially, Chikwado is treated as an outlier due to the bias inherent in the narrator's point of view; however, it seems that the narrator herself is an outlier. The narrative portrays Chikwado’s marital goals as an obsession: “[Chikwado] would come to work the next morning sleepy, the whites of her eyes flecked with red, but already planning to attend another service” (Paragraph 4). However, her behavior is seen as normal because it aligns with the goals of the other women at the narrator’s workplace. Marriage was “all [their] female co-workers talked about” (Paragraph 4) at lunch. Due to this information and the narrator’s own admitted distance from the topic (“While they talked, I would look out the window” (Paragraph 4)), the story’s gendered landscape becomes clearer.
It is only when the narrator reveals that her lover likes birds and that she changes her personality to suit his interests (“…I became a person who liked birds” (Paragraph 9) that the story creates parallels between the pageantry of bird courtship and human relationships. Like bird courtships, human courtships in the world of this story are framed by rigidly defined gender roles. Thus, Bird Courtship works as a symbol in the overarching theme of gender as pageantry since the narrator, her lover, and her coworkers do things (like frequently attending marriage-themed religious services) in the hope of deepening their connection with other people through external validation.
In the narrator’s monologue about the rituals of distrust people inherit from culture (Paragraph 75), she emphasizes the weight of this theme. Her lover is a man who pretends to not like the privileges that come with his status, but in truth, he likes showing her the things he is recognized for because it makes him appear as a partner deserving of her attention. She feels that her lover has “close[d] the door too soon” because he forgoes the liberatory possibilities of this new relationship in favor of compartmentalization and secrecy. In the end, he is unable to see her as more than a reflection of his accomplishments. Since she is unwilling to accept this diminution of her humanity, their relationship must end.
Gender expectations create hierarchies that, in this story’s worldview, stand as obstacles to genuine love.
Sexism in Everyday Life is the secondary theme of the story. It supports the narrative’s main theme, Gender as Pageantry, by demonstrating how gender roles unfairly impede women’s self-realization.
This theme appears during the story’s climax where the narrator’s lover’s driver, Emmanuel, refuses to show the same level of respect to the narrator as he does her lover’s wife (Paragraph 35). In a separate flashback, Chikwado contextualizes the power married women have in Lagos society. After a car accident involving a taxi, the taxi driver—who is clearly at fault—calls the narrator a “stupid girl…a common nuisance” (Paragraph 49). When she recalls the incident to Chikwado, Chikwado states that if the narrator had been “wearing a wedding ring, he would not have shouted at [her] like that” (Paragraph 51).
These two instances paint a clear picture of the gender politics of the city. Married women are honored while unmarried women are made either made invisible (e.g., the waiter refusing to greet the narrator (Paragraph 66)) or disposable (e.g., the narrator’s lover kicking her out of his house when she calls him a “bastard” instead of crying (Paragraph 47)). Sexism influences relationships—preventing a true, durable connection between the narrator and her lover.
Cultural signals such as the need to “settle down” (Paragraph 4) by a certain age create additional barriers to meaningful relationships. Men acquire social capital through their careers and connections, but for women, this form of capital comes only through marriage. To be seen and respected as full-fledged members of their society, they must get married. They must also do so in a hurry, because unlike men, their perceived marriageability declines with each passing year. This pressure then becomes a contest wherein women must prove their worth, even if they have earned it through society’s rules.
When reflecting on the woman staring at her in the secondary narrative, the narrator notes that “there was something in the set of [the woman’s] lips…that suggested an unsatisfying triumph, as though she had won a battle but hated having had to fight in the first place” (Paragraph 18). If the woman is indeed the lover’s wife, then she has won the battle—earned external validation from society—but this does not mean that her victory is permanent. The narrator’s lover, through his affair with her, proves the precariousness of his wife’s status. As her husband, it would seem that he does not have the same concerns: His status derives from his own accomplishments, evidenced in newspaper clippings and text-message accolades (Paragraph 12), not in his connection to a marriage partner.
When the narrator finally leaves him, she leaves because she now understands “the game” he and other men play. Men in the story reinforce gendered power dynamics that place women in servile positions, such as when the narrator’s boss makes her and Chikwado serve cake at the office. Sexism in this environment is an inescapable reality that requires interrogation despite how ordinary—like being stuck in traffic—it may seem.
Adichie uses the theme of Disconnection to illustrate how gender roles and sexism can make relationships unsustainable. The narrator’s affair serves as an example of how gender roles and sexism can corrupt relationships.
In the narrative’s first flashback, the narrator establishes that her affair’s ending is predetermined because her lover is married. Her admission that she should not have continued the relationship after he told her he would not “stand in [her] way” (Paragraph 5) if she wanted to marry points to an inherent difference in what the pair expects from one another: He does not want to change her life while she wants to “sweep in and disrupt” his (Paragraph 5). The narrator describes hiding the “damage” (Paragraph 6) his comments did to her through sarcasm, which suggests that she had hoped for something more substantial to come out of their blossoming relationship. In fact, the context explaining what leads up to his hurtful words, “We were naked in bed; it was our first time…I could not believe how easily the words rolled out of his mouth” (Paragraph 5), reinforces the gap in their expectations. She wants to remain open to possibility, while he wants to foreclose those possibilities, keeping the affair clandestine and temporary. Their relationship deteriorates not only because of different expectations, but because the pair were never truly connected to one another.
The narrator’s romantic relationship comes to stand for more than just a woman reflecting on a past love. Instead, her relationship comes to represent how social conditions such as gender roles corrupt human connection and thus disconnect people from the world around them.
In turn, this Disconnection creates complacency. In her monologue about “rituals of distrust,” the narrator states, “We know the rules and we follow them, and we never make room for things we might not have imagined” (Paragraph 75). The narrator blames social conditioning (“the rules”) but knows that the only way to combat that conditioning is by imagining alternatives. If people like her lover are unable to at least imagine a different way of connecting with others, then changing the social conditions that impact human relationships is impossible.
After ending her relationship, the narrator notices how “uncomfortable” (78) her office is. She reacts to this discomfort by acting in a manner she never did previously. She criticizes her boss’s prayer meetings and sexist behavior (Paragraphs 79-87). In this way, the narrator shows that she is no longer complacent in her life and no longer disconnected from the world around her.
By Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie