78 pages • 2 hours read
Suleika JaouadA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
Summary
Chapter Summaries & Analyses
Key Figures
Themes
Symbols & Motifs
Important Quotes
Essay Topics
Tools
The motifs of travel and home support Between Two Kingdom’s theme of living with uncertainty. The idea of kingdoms is introduced into the narrative through the title but also through Suleika’s history of moving and travel. Having established the back-and-forth of travel early in the book, the ideas and language of travel amplify the gravity of Suleika’s illness. Jaouad notes, “I was crossing over into a new land. And with every step I was feeling less like Suleika” (67). The motif grows in significance at the beginning of Part 2 when Jaouad introduces Sontag’s quote: “Everyone who is born holds dual citizenship, in the kingdom of the well and in the kingdom of the sick” (199). This quote expands the space between the two as an inevitability and increases the ties between her travel and health in-betweens. A few lines later, she applies the language of kingdoms and citizenship to her situation: “It is where I find myself now, on the threshold between an old familiar state and an unknown future. […] I’m left with the question of how to repatriate myself to the kingdom of the well, and whether I ever fully can” (200). Applying the language of citizenship reiterates the complexity of health and wellness.
Cars, planes, trains, subways, and buses denote a relationship between Suleika’s agency and impotence. Modes of transportation are highlighted when Suleika traverses the unknown. In “Space Traveling and Gaining Momentum,” an exhausted and frail Suleika gets lost taking trains and buses on the way to her doctor’s appointment. At the end of the chapter, she returns to the US on a plane, shivers under a blanket, and dreams of herself as feeble, in a wheelchair, and unrecognizable to friends and family. Her lack of control over her health turns her around and carries her from one country to another. She is an experienced traveler, but the lack of competence and control in travel parallels the lack of control over her body. These places of travel also demonstrate how characters grow and gain a sense of self-confidence and insight into uncertainty. When Suleika learns to drive and goes on the road trip, her ability to drive represents not full control over her health, but a new-found ability to live with its uncertainties. Jaouad observes this change in herself in “The Long Foray”:
Two weeks earlier, when I first left home, I was so tense that I regularly had to remind myself to breathe. […] But with each day, I am feeling more confident, and it has been at least seventy-two hours since another driver has honked at me in anger or bewilderment (255).
The long car rides provide Suleika with time to process her breakup with Will and the uncertain future with Jon. During those hours of driving, she finds herself able to see new truths and no longer tries to bury her pain: “But in the end, it wasn’t the illness that had driven him away; it was me” (284). The moment of chaotic remembering follows the weather: “It’s snowing harder now, and my windshield wipers are working overtime” (284). Jaouad shows how the heart and head work overtime, too, and driving becomes synonymous with finding fluidity in unknowns and never-to-be-knowns.
The mention and practice of writing and reading symbolize growth and sustenance for many characters. Journaling enters the narrative in Chapter 1 as a form of connection with the self. Suleika’s journaling practice is a throughline from her pre-diagnosis self to the post-treatment self and represents power and agency. Writing’s symbolic nature is enhanced through her first 100-day project: “I decided to return to what I had always leaned on in difficult times: keeping a journal. I promised myself that, no matter how sick or exhausted I felt, I would try to jot something down every day” (106). Although writing demonstrates continuity, the 100-day project also marks a development in how Suleika understands herself. Her words and topics focus more than ever on the experience of her body, whereas before her writing functioned as a place for dreaming and telling other people’s stories. Jaouad writes, “Illness had turned my gaze inward” (107). Suleika’s inwardness articulates itself through her desire to share her experience with a larger audience.
The blog and then the New York Times column, “Life, Interrupted,” mark Suleika’s desire to reach beyond herself and connect with others via her writing. Jaouad writes, “I wanted, in my own way, however small, to contribute something to the world. To leave more than I took” (115). The columns are a contribution, but they are also an antidote to the unknown future, a way to reach beyond the boundaries of her isolation and mortality. Publicly sharing her cancer journey gives Suleika the unexpected gift of “conduits to the outside world” when she is in isolation at the hospital (126). The power of words, she finds, is that her unique experience touches on the isolation, pain, and purgatory of those struggling with infertility, homelessness, suicide, and grief of all kinds. The readers reach out to Suleika through letters and emails, and though these communications are often limited during her days of treatment, she defies space and time by forging ties during one of the most isolating periods of her treatment.
Letter writing plays a significant role not only in Suleika’s sustenance and survival during isolation but in her path toward healing. She plans her 100-day road trip itinerary largely based on the letters that she received from people who read her column. Jaouad risks connection with these people who wrote her months and years before, declaring, “We will go where the letters take us and see what we find” (226). These letters and email exchanges throughout the book become a symbol of deepening intimacy between friends and lovers. Will and Suleika, too, deepen their relationship through writing letters and emails when he still lives in the US, and she has moved to Paris. Howard and Meral recall the same kind of courtship when Suleika visits them. When Suleika visits Katherine in California, she tells Suleika how her son Brooke often reached out to people through letters. He formed connections and received opportunities through this practice so often that their family now calls letter writing “Doing a Brooke.” His letter to their family upon his death now acts as a living document, a way for them to see him even after he’s passed away. Suleika mentions words and art as a form that defies death: “Whenever I wake up missing my friends, I visit them through their words and watercolors” (344). The words cannot revive her friends, but they allow Suleika to commune with dear ones even when they can’t be with her.
Bone marrow represents Suleika’s life and sense of mortality. It wasn’t until Suleika learned about her diagnosis that she became intimate with the function and purpose of bone marrow:
Up until this point the extent of my knowledge about bone marrow came from French cuisine—boeuf a la moelle, the fancy dish occasionally served with a side of toasted baguette. Dr. Holland explained that the marrow, an organ at the very core of the body, was a living, sponge-like tissue that filled almost every bone (59).
Bone marrow is the source of her cancer, and its malignant cells force her to face the purpose of her life and what she hopes to do to change it. Later, when Suleika is in remission, bone marrow is the source of both life and uncertainty: “I can’t know if there is a rogue cancer cell lurking somewhere in my marrow. […] But I’m beginning to understand this: We never know. Life is a foray into mystery” (265). Cancer plunged Suleika into the seas of not knowing about life and death much sooner than most. The bone marrow symbolizes for her the continuance of life and the reminder that life contains no certainties.
Jaouad repeats sets of two in Part 1 and three in Part 2 to symbolize Suleika’s character growth. In Part 1, Suleika characterizes her thinking and actions based on binaries: alive and dead, sick and well, fertile and infertile, love and hate, and staying together or breaking up. Sickness splits Suleika in two—before illness and after—and forces her into situations where she feels stuck and uncertain about how to move forward. Sets of two establish a character wrestling with the expectations she has for her life and what’s possible now that she faces illness.
In Part 2, Suleika approaches situations with more complexity and learns to live in between. Sets of three denote an expansion of thought, representing Suleika’s ability to expand beyond the binary and find a new, often uncertain, path forward. When Jon and Suleika meet in California to discuss their relationship, Jon asks Suleika three questions: “Do you like me? […] Do you like being with me? […] Then why does everything need to be so dang complicated?” (315). Suleika finds that she’s been thinking in terms of two possible outcomes: staying together or breaking up. Jon’s three questions illicit a new possibility—they can stay together and figure out how to care for one another’s needs.
When Suleika enters isolation for the first time, she names her room “The Bubble.” The Bubble symbolizes the land of the sick. Describing the Bubble, Jaouad says, “Anyone who entered my room […] had to wear the mandatory protective armor—face masks, gloves, surgical gown” (74). This coincides with her chemotherapy treatments and side effects becoming more intense. She fantasizes about escaping and tries to, only to find that her fear mounts when she is around people. The Bubble represents safety and security from the outside world while it also cocoons and isolates her. Her body begins to take on this walled-off character, a hell that she can’t escape. No matter how many people surround Suleika, she realizes that the Bubble and her illness are her experience alone: “I knew how lucky I was to be surrounded by such love […] but even with my parents and Will by my side, I felt achingly isolated” (77). No one besides her can fully enter or know the confines of her body and its illness.
Early in Suleika’s treatment, she realizes that a side effect is infertility. This is the first of many plans to topple because of her diagnosis. Her eggs and a desire to preserve them represent her attempts to preserve a “normal” future or at least its potential. Jaouad writes, “Although I wasn’t planning for a baby anytime soon, preserving my ability to have one felt like my only lifeline to an uncertain future” (65). Cancer imposed a new timeline and thwarted assumptions about the future. Eggs symbolize hope, seeds of potential. Suleika’s insistence to preserve them demonstrates her will to live.
The language of illness seeps into Suleika’s experiences, particularly in her relationship with Will. In “Painting in Watercolor,” Jaouad describes “a marrow-deep weariness […] that infected the growing distance between Will and me” (162). Illness intensifies the stakes between them, and the motif of medical language exposes how the illness was a force beyond their control, even as they tried to find a solution. She writes, “Will got sick of my sickness” (195). The dual use of language to describe Suleika’s illness and their relationship magnifies the stakes for each. For example, Jaouad writes, “I had a choice to make: If I wanted a shot at finding my place among the living, I would need to stop fighting for a relationship that had flatlined long ago” (195). The shared language entwines each storyline’s resolution as essential to Suleika’s healing.