logo

30 pages 1 hour read

Jhumpa Lahiri

A Temporary Matter

Fiction | Short Story | Adult | Published in 1998

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Literary Devices

Point of View

Lahiri uses the third-person omniscient point of view. The narrative voice is characterized by simple, straightforward prose. Lahiri’s narrative language is direct and descriptive, which she juxtaposes with the characters’ indirect communication. The narration is accessible and inornate to replicate the ordinariness of everyday experiences. This direct language allows Lahiri to highlight the trials of marriage as well as the experience of children of immigrants through the lens of literary realism. The “close third” narration creates distance between the characters and the reader, while it also allows the narrative scope to remain fixed on Shukumar and stay present in the house. Lahiri employs the “close third” narration to build tension toward Shoba’s climatic confession. The impact of the story’s resolution is heightened by the simplicity of the closing lines: “They wept together, for the things they now knew” (22).

Foreshadowing

Foreshadowing is a narrative device that Lahiri uses to signal what will happen in the story. Specifically, Lahiri uses foreshadowing to suggest that the couple is not heading toward a happy reconciliation. In the beginning of the story, Shoba returns home in her gym attire. Her makeup is worn from the predictable event of her working out before returning home from work. In the end of the story, Shoba returns home in a different attire with refreshed makeup. This altered routine suggests that Shoba’s arrival on the fifth night harbors an unexpected change.

In addition, Shukumar notes that after the loss of their baby, Shoba no longer shops for groceries, stocks the pantry with premade goods, and cooks meals. Shoba’s detachment from previously joyful domestic tasks indicates that she is no longer invested in her life with Shukumar. In turn, Shukumar en passant reveals that Shoba keeps a separate bank account for her bonuses. These instances foreshadow Shoba’s final confession that she intends to leave Shukumar.

Situational Irony

Situational irony occurs when something does not happen as expected. Unlike dramatic irony, in which the reader knows something the characters do not, situational irony is structured to surprise both the reader and the characters. With each candlelit confession, Lahiri offers the possibility of reconciliation between Shoba and Shukumar.

The narration closely follows Shukumar, who becomes increasingly optimistic about reconnecting with Shoba. When the couple comes together to make love on the fourth night, Shukumar happily anticipates his next candlelit dinner with Shoba. However, Shukumar’s hope for marital progress is dashed during the final dinnertime conversation, when Shoba announces that she has leased an apartment. Shukumar has an epiphany: His wife has not been preparing for their life together—stockpiling goods, procuring emergency supplies—because she has been preparing for her life without him. This realization “sicken[s]” Shukumar, and he counters Shoba’s confession with one of his own: He was at the hospital and held their baby before the cremation. Just as Lahiri positions the couple’s exchanges as a progression toward reconciliation, the narration intentionally omits the truth of Shukumar’s presence at the hospital. Shukumar’s confession is another example of situational irony because the narrative led both readers and Shoba to believe that Shukumar “[wasn’t] even there.” In employing situational irony, the author allows the reader to share in Shoba and Shukumar’s epiphanies.

Repetition

Lahiri repeats words, phrases, and even events to create a cyclical effect. Shoba and Shukumar exist in a perpetual cycle of grief, and this repetitive cycle operates on both a micro and macro level over the course of the story.

On the micro level, each day for Shukumar feels like the previous. The repetition of “endless” underscores Shukumar’s isolation. Day after day, week after week, he lives the same hollow existence in the aftermath of his loss. As a result, he feels trapped in a loveless marriage and can no longer find meaning in his existence. Shukumar adopts the role of domestic caretaker to maintain a semblance of purpose, yet he is unable to fulfill that role as Shoba once had. Ironically, the “endless” supply of dry goods Shukumar notes runs out, indicating his inability to keep his family together.

On the macro level, Shoba’s announcement to Shukumar that she is leaving parallels her previous announcement of pregnancy. Shoba turns on the lights to look Shukumar in the face, just as she had turned off the TV the year prior. Shukumar notes that Shoba uses the exact same words to break this news: “I want you to see my face when I tell you this” (21). Shukumar believes that he is ”prepared” for her news and hopes she is not pregnant again. However, Shoba upends Shukumar’s expectations by introducing a way to alter their cycle of grief—by her leaving him.

To break the cycle, the couple relies on the repetitive action of eating dinner together by candlelight during the power outages. The first four dark evenings are bookended with the phrase “whispered his name” (4,19). Before the outages begin, Shukumar wonders how long it has been since Shoba has intimately said his name. Then, when they make love on the fourth night, Shoba does so, though she quietly weeps. On the final day, Shukumar and Shoba repeat the pattern of eating together in the dark, even though the outage is over. Lahiri uses the repetitive action of eating and drinking by candlelight to punctuate the couple’s progression toward a marital resolution, or the story’s denouement.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
blurred text